(2017-03) Territorial Planning and Anticipating Risk: Serviced Plots versus Social Housing
Summary — Rose-May Guignard of the CIAT setting serviced plots against social housing as the response to Haiti's housing need, presented to the Table Verte du Grand Sud in March 2017. Her context is disorderly growth already short of roads, water, sanitation, electricity, health care and schools before Matthew, and displaced and internally migrating populations after it.
Key Findings
- Poses the housing choice explicitly: build social housing units, or service land and let households build incrementally.
- Pre-Matthew urban growth was already disorderly and short of roads, water, sanitation, electricity, health care and schools.
- Post-Matthew, two demands arrived together: housing the disaster-affected and absorbing internal migration.
- It is the servicing rather than the building that decides whether the resulting neighbourhood is liveable.
Full Description
This is the clearest statement of housing policy choice in the CIAT material, and it is a choice most Haitian housing discussion avoids. The alternative Guignard puts up is between building social housing units and providing serviced land, the trame assainie: laying out plots with road access, water, drainage and power and letting occupants build incrementally. Her framing establishes why the question is urgent rather than academic. Before Hurricane Matthew, urban growth was already disorderly and deficient in roads and services, water and sanitation, electricity, health care and education. After Matthew, two demands arrived at once, housing the disaster-affected and absorbing internal migration. The argument implicit in the pairing is one of arithmetic and speed: a social housing programme delivers a smaller number of finished units at higher unit cost, while servicing land delivers the framework for many more dwellings that households complete themselves, and it is the servicing, not the building, that determines whether the resulting neighbourhood is liveable. That is exactly the choice the neighbourhood-rehabilitation guide and the commune plans elsewhere in this collection assume without naming.
Full Document Text
Extracted text from the original document for search indexing.
Aménagement du Territoire:
Anticiper le risque
Terrains viabilisés versus
logement social
Rose-May Guignard
Contexte: Croissance désordonnée
• Avant Mathew: Carences
voirie, services: eau &
assainissement,
électricité, soins de
santé, éducation
• Post Mathew
–Répondre aux besoins
des populations sinistrées
–Répondre à la migration
interne
Offre de logement social
• Offre logement social,
réponse ne réponds pas a
la demande
• Localisation basée sur
disponibilité de terrains
• Non-inclusion des
services de base: eau,
assainissement, gestion
déchets, équipements
communautaires
Trame assainie: solution pour les familles
et les villes
• Voirie
• Eau
• Assainissement approprié
• Gestion déchets
• 33% espace public
• Espaces collectifs (école,
salle communautaire,
soins de santé)
Une solution Trame assainie pour 100
ménages
La solution logement dans le cadre de
projet de trame assainie
Ce qui marche:
• Assistance à la
reconstruction avec
formation des ouvriers,
• Accès aux matériaux de
construction de qualité
• Assistance conditionnée
aux normes: gestion de
risque et extension
planifiée
ACAPE, Les Cayes
Haven, Ouanaminthe
La solution à long terme pour les villes
Structuration à long terme des villes
de manière compacte est la solution
durable
Merci de votre attention