The Regional Planning Authority
- Making a plan is not enough to get it applied: the failure is institutional, not technical.
- Investments that would give a plan effect are decided in isolation by sectoral ministries, so no plan governs them.
- A multitude of actors is managed from the capital, placing decisions far from the territory they change.
- The proposal is a regional planning authority with real standing over investment, at the scale plans are drawn.
This presentation names the obstacle that the rest of the CIAT planning corpus keeps running into. Haiti produces territorial plans; they are not implemented. Michèle Oriol's diagnosis is institutional rather than technical. Making a plan does not make it applied. The investments that would give a plan effect are decided in isolation by sectoral ministries, each on its own logic, so no plan governs them. A multitude of actors is managed from the capital, which puts the decision far from the territory it changes. The proposed answer is a regional planning authority, an institution at the scale at which plans are actually drawn but with real standing over investment. Read against CIAT's Centre-Artibonite and North/North-East plans, the argument is uncomfortable and useful: those documents are careful, costed and detailed, and this paper explains the mechanism by which such documents come to sit unused.
How to cite
Government of Haiti; Interministerial Committee for Territorial Planning (CIAT), 2015, The Regional Planning Authority, http://ciat.gouv.ht/sites/default/files/articles/files/Autorit%C3%A9%20r%C3%A9gionale%20d%27amenagement%20-%20CIAT%20-%20Michele%20Oriol.pdf