Institutional Diagnosis of the Superior Court of Auditors and Administrative Disputes
Summary: The institutional diagnosis that underpinned the court's 2016-2024 strategic plan: the state of its legal framework, organization, human resources, information systems and audit methods, with the gaps against the international standards for supreme audit institutions.
Key Findings
- The August 2015 diagnostic was produced at the request of the CSCCA Council with support from UNDP's Rule of Law project in Haiti.
- The mission began on 8 June 2015 for two months and was narrowed after consultations to an institutional diagnostic with reform proposals.
- The report finds the legal framework incomplete, CSCCA independence insufficiently secured, the dual mandate executed unevenly, and some administrative activities inappropriate for the Court.
- It says the organizational chart is undefined, creating hierarchy inconsistencies, while staffing is bloated and demotivated.
- Work methods are not formalized, management IT tools are absent, HR management is partial, archiving is inadequate, the working environment is poor and communication is not assured.
- The report finds financial control ineffective and administrative jurisdiction weakly institutionalized, with judicial review not performed by CSCCA or the Constitutional Council and administrative litigation marginal.
Full Description
The institutional diagnosis that underpinned the court's 2016-2024 strategic plan: the state of its legal framework, organization, human resources, information systems and audit methods, with the gaps against the international standards for supreme audit institutions.
How to cite
Superior Court of Accounts and Administrative Disputes (CSCCA), 2015, Institutional Diagnosis of the Superior Court of Auditors and Administrative Disputes, https://cscca.gouv.ht/