Macaya National Park: The Post-Matthew Situation
- Assesses a protected area that has a baseline inventory, so damage is stated against a recorded starting point rather than in impressions.
- Macaya's forest cover is the upper watershed for the communes below it, which links the park's condition to their flood exposure.
- Prices six intervention axes over five years, the largest being buffer-zone socioeconomic development at 35M against 6M for surveillance, though the source states no currency for any of them.
Macaya is the massif at the western end of the southern peninsula and the country's most important remaining cloud forest, which also put it directly in Matthew's path. This presentation by the park's management unit, with the national protected-areas agency and the environment ministry, reports its condition five months after the storm. Its length relative to the other decks in the session reflects that a protected area has an inventory to compare against, so damage can be stated in terms of what was there before rather than impressions. For a territorial library the case matters beyond conservation: Macaya's forest cover is the upper watershed of the rivers running through the communes below it, so its condition is an input to the flood exposure of settlements downstream, which is the link the CIAT's watershed colloquium had argued seven years earlier.
How to cite
Government of Haiti; National Agency for Protected Areas (ANAP); Ministry of the Environment (MDE); Interministerial Committee for Territorial Planning (CIAT), 2017, Macaya National Park: The Post-Matthew Situation, http://ciat.gouv.ht/sites/default/files/articles/files/Macaya%20Post%20Matthew_Pitchon%2030032017.pptx