Guns, Books, or Doctors? Conflict and Public Spending in Haiti: Lessons from Cross-Country Evidence

Guns, Books, or Doctors? Conflict and Public Spending in Haiti: Lessons from Cross-Country Evidence

Summary: This paper explores the conditions under which public spending can minimize violent conflict in Haiti, drawing on an empirical analysis of 148 countries. Simulations suggest that increased military spending in Haiti would be associated with a higher risk of conflict, while greater welfare expenditure (education, health, and social assistance) would be associated with a lower risk.
Key Findings
Full Description

Haiti's economic development has been hindered by a history of civil conflict and violence. With donor assistance declining and concessional financing growing scarce, Haiti must learn to live with tighter budget constraints. Against this backdrop, this paper explores the conditions under which public spending can minimize violent conflict, drawing possible lessons for Haiti. Drawing on an empirical analysis of 148 countries over the period 1960–2009, simulations for Haiti suggest that increases in military spending would be associated with a higher risk of conflict, an observation in line with Haiti’s own history. Greater welfare expenditure (education, health, and social assistance), by contrast, would be associated with lower risk of conflict. The paper concludes that Haiti should prioritize social spending to reduce grievances and conflict.

Sectors
Geography
Time Coverage
1960 to 2009

How to cite

World Bank; Michigan State University; European University Institute; Waseda University, 2016, Guns, Books, or Doctors? Conflict and Public Spending in Haiti: Lessons from Cross-Country Evidence, accessed via HaitiDocs, https://www.haitidocs.org/doc/wb-2016-guns-books-or-doctors-conflict