(2017-03) Fallen and Broken Trees: Hurricane Matthew, Impact and Responses
Summary — ORE's assessment of what Hurricane Matthew did to the tree stock of southern Haiti and what responses follow, presented to the Table Verte of 30-31 March 2017. Its distinction between trees felled and trees broken is the operative one, because the two call for different interventions.
Key Findings
- The felled/broken distinction is operative: an uprooted tree is a total loss, a snapped but rooted tree may recover with pruning.
- That distinction sets both the restoration cost and how fast tree-crop household income can return.
- Tree crops are a large share of rural livelihood in southern Haiti, so the recovery timeline is an income question.
Full Description
The title carries the analysis. A tree uprooted by wind is a total loss to be replaced, and replacement means years before a fruit tree bears again; a tree snapped but still rooted may recover with pruning and care, in a season rather than a decade. Distinguishing the two across the affected area therefore determines both the cost of restoration and how quickly household income from tree crops can return, which in southern Haiti is a large share of rural livelihood. ORE, a long-established Haitian environmental rehabilitation organisation with deep experience in fruit-tree and agroforestry work in the south, presented this to the post-Matthew Table Verte alongside its companion paper on energy forests.
Full Document Text
Extracted text from the original document for search indexing.
ARBRES TOMBÉS ET ARBRES CASSÉS
OURAGAN MATTHEW, OCTOBRE 2017
IMPACT & RÉPONSES
Enquête d’évaluation des dégâts
Interventions post-Matthew
Ne pas rater la campagne agricole en cours:
• Déblayage des parcelles
• Semences
• Cash
MERCI!