The Sherlson Sanon case: clarifications from the RNDDH
- Sherlson Sanon spent ten years in pretrial detention and was sentenced to one year.
- He was released at once under the Loi de Lespinasse, having already served longer than his sentence.
- The network rejects the attempt to place responsibility for that detention on it.
- The right to order incarceration belongs to the judicial authorities, which makes them responsible for illegal and arbitrary detention.
On 20 January 2023 Sherlson Sanon was tried by the Port-au-Prince criminal court sitting without a jury for criminal association and false denunciation, sentenced to one year in prison, and released under the Loi de Lespinasse because he had already spent longer in detention than the sentence he received. The network was then held responsible in public for his ten years of illegal and arbitrary pretrial detention, and this document is its answer. Its position is that the right to order a person's incarceration belongs to the judicial authorities and that they are therefore responsible for every case of illegal and arbitrary pretrial detention. Anyone whose judicial guarantees have been violated should take the matter to those authorities, to denounce them and to demand reparation.
How to cite
National Human Rights Defense Network (RNDDH), 2023, The Sherlson Sanon case: clarifications from the RNDDH, https://web.rnddh.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/1-RapM-Dossier-Sherlson-Sanon-Precisions-du-RNDDH-23Jan2023-FR.pdf
- Rights holder
- Réseau National de Défense des Droits Humains (RNDDH)