Building to Learn: ECDAN Symposium, Haiti
- Treats the school building as pedagogy rather than shelter, turning each of the multiple intelligences into a design instruction with a named architectural device.
- Argues that spaces for intrapersonal work, cave-like niches with a protective back, stable atmosphere and appropriate light, are hard to find in standard classroom design and therefore have to be deliberately created.
- Specifies how, with marginal spaces where the architect controls form (more wall than opening), light (indirect and filtered) and colour (warm tones), favouring wood, stone and terracotta.
- Names the failure mode and its fix: such spaces risk becoming claustrophobic, avoided by not carrying walls to the ceiling so the space stays open.
- Finds the naturalist intelligence needs almost no infrastructure, only the staging of what the site already holds, a hole in a wall or a stair around a tree, with small vegetable gardens and mini-ponds sustaining curiosity at low cost.
- Places parents and community inside the built environment, with their involvement beginning in the design and construction process rather than at handover.
- Draws its examples from comparable contexts rather than from high-income ones, Anna Heringer's school in Bangladesh, Francis Kéré's school at Gando in Burkina Faso and a Tezuka Architects kindergarten in Japan.
Proceedings of the Haiti ECDAN symposium on school environments and learning, 2018, largely presentation slides. Its subject is what a school building does to a child's learning, taken through the multiple intelligences framework, and it is the only document in this set that treats architecture as pedagogy rather than as shelter.
Each intelligence is turned into a design instruction with a stated architectural device. For intrapersonal intelligence the reference image is a cave or niche offering a protective back and a stable atmosphere with appropriate light, and the note observes that such spaces are hard to find in standard classroom and school design, so they have to be created: marginal spaces where the architect controls form (more wall than opening), light (indirect and filtered) and wall colour (warm tones), favouring natural materials of wood, stone and terracotta. It also names the risk, that such a space becomes claustrophobic, and the fix, not carrying walls to the ceiling so the space stays open.
For naturalist intelligence the argument is that almost no infrastructure is needed, only the staging of what is already on the site: a hole in a wall or a stair around a tree is enough to prompt observation, and small vegetable gardens or mini-ponds inside the school grounds sustain curiosity at low cost. Parents and community are treated as part of the built environment too, with involvement beginning in the design and construction process itself. The examples are drawn from Anna Heringer's school in Bangladesh, Francis Kéré's school at Gando in Burkina Faso and a Tezuka Architects kindergarten in Japan.
How to cite
Ministry of National Education and Vocational Training (MENFP), 2018, Building to Learn: ECDAN Symposium, Haiti, https://menfp.gouv.ht/#/documents/official