(2014-10-02) The Need for Case-by-Case Solutions in Land-Tenure Regularization
Summary — This workshop presentation draws comparative lessons for Haiti from land-tenure regularization and certification programs in similar contexts.
Key Findings
- Adds Haiti-specific evidence from Land Portal's broader Haiti keyword search.
- Supports research on land administration, land tenure, cadastre, housing reconstruction, territorial information, rural land management or property-rights programming.
- Metadata was authored manually from local PDFs and recovered source records.
Full Description
The presentation frames Haiti alongside countries with poverty, instability, weak land governance, informal tenure, smallholder agriculture, migration pressures and agricultural land scarcity. It uses comparative examples to argue that land-tenure interventions require case-specific design rather than a single uniform model.
Full Document Text
Extracted text from the original document for search indexing.
The need for case-by-case solutions: lessons
learned from land tenure regularization and
land tenure certification programs in countries
with characteristics similar to Haiti
Kent Elbow
Land Tenure and Property Rights Issues and Best
Practices Workshop
02 October 2014
First – what do we mean by
“Countries with characteristics similar to Haiti”?
Shared characteristics:
• Poverty
• Political and social instability
• Weak land governance
• Informal customary land tenure
rights and management
• Smallholder agriculture
• Challenging migration patterns
• Demographic pressure and
increasing scarcity of agricultural
land
But there are also key differences:
• Land tenure policies and laws
• Social and political histories
• Regional influences
• Economies
• Traumatic events (natural
disasters, wars, coups d’état…)
• Demographic patterns
2
An example from
Central African Republic
Targeting transparency and improved property rights
governance in the artisanal diamond mining sector:
Property Rights and Artisanal Diamond Development*
(PRADD) Project
*Financed and implemented by USAID
3
Targeting transparency and improved
property rights governance in the artisanal
diamond mining sector:
The Property Rights and Artisanal Diamond Development
(PRADD) project targets local development while extending and
consolidating implementation of the Kimberley Process –
particularly by achieving transparency in
the diamond marketing chain from mine to export
The Kimberley Process (KP) is a joint governments, industry and
civil society initiative to stem the flow of conflict diamonds – rough
diamonds used by rebel movements to finance wars against
legitimate governments (from KP website).
4
PRADD BASELINE QUESTIONS:
Who are these people?
5
Do they have the right to dig for diamonds?
6
Does the government receive revenues from their
diamond sales?
7
Is it known how many diamonds are produced? Who
buys the diamonds? For how much?
8
What are the environmental costs?
9
BASELINE HYPOTHESES AND APPROACH:
Formalization of land rights encourages registration of
diamonds and reduces opportunities for illicit transactions
Export
Marketing
Registered
production
Unregistered
production
10
Customary Rights
Legal Regime
FORMALISATION OF
LEGITIMATE PROPERTY
RIGHTS
Transparency and Security
11
The Mining Code Presents Opportunities for
Securing and Formalizing Legitimate Claims
•Mining licenses and permits
•Production notebook
Name
Location
of mine
Production
Name 1
X,Y
carats
Name 2
X,Y
carats
Name 3
X,Y
carats
Name 4
X,Y
carats
Name 5
X,Y
carats
Name 6
X,Y
carats
But must reconcile property rights claims of stakeholders:
•Local and migrant miners
•Industrial mining companies
•Customary tenure authorities
•Statutory laws
12
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION:
PRADD program in Boda beginning May 2007
B
N
In Nola beginning January 2010
13
Steps to formalize the property rights of artisanal miners
Participatory research
Census of artisanal miners
Socio-economic surveys
Collection of geographical coordinates
Resolution of conflicts
Validation of artisanal property rights
Award of customary certificates
Legal registration of artisanal miners
14
Determining the baseline, identifying and
debating diverse land uses, customs and rights
Resolving conflicts locally
Collecting coordinates and mapping
Community validation of property rights
15
The experience of PRADD CAR suggests that transparent
formalization of legitimate property rights in mining zones can
result in a variety of benefits such as:
•Increased property rights security
•Greater investment
•Enhanced transparency
•Reduced disputes
•More complete and reliable production
information
•Exploration of alternative land use options
16
Additional observations regarding PRADD
experience in conflict-prone CAR
•
•
•
Living with the risk that piloted reforms will be lost to future social conflict and
instability:
- PRADD start-up in early-2007 followed on the heels of re-establishment of
US Consulate following coup of March 2003
- Another civil war began late-2012 (PRADD-CAR already suspended)
followed by a coup d’état in March 2013 and unrest continuing to present
PRADD successes:
- Piloting and significant up-scaling of property rights inventory methodology
- Increased transparency of mineral and land rights and marketing of diamonds
- Hard-won buy-in from Ministry of Mines and other government agencies
Retrospective question: in interest of targeting future gains once the time is
right – should a higher priority have been placed on land tenure policy reform
(existing land tenure legislation from early-1960s is little applied) and legal
adoption of the customary property rights certificate?
17
Burkina Faso: an ambitious agenda and
a long-term approach to land tenure policy reform
Baseline situation:
• Centralized land rights and
management authority (1984 RAF
established land as state property)
• Little capacity to implement land
policy
• Pervasive and increasing land
conflict with multiple triggers
(growing populations, changing
livestock routes with drought,
return of refugees from Côte
d’Ivoire, increasing cotton
production, resettlement in former
river blindness areas…)
*Financed by MCC, 2010-2014
Long-term calendar:
• 2000-2007 – diagnostics and
consensus building on national scale
• 2007 – new rural land tenure policy
• 2009 new rural land tenure law
introducing sweeping new tools,
policies and institutions (emphasis
on decentralized land tenure
management)
• 2010-2014 – implementation of
national MCC/MCA Rural Land
Governance* national land project
($60m)
18
Burkina Faso: an ambitious agenda and
a long-term approach to land tenure policy reform (2)
• The Rural Land Governance Project* targeted implementation
of new and innovative land law at a national scale
• General status of implementation of Law 034 on rural land
tenure adopted June 2009 at end of MCC compact (July 2014):
-
SFR (decentralized land services) established in 47 Communes (of
351 total Communes)
First APFRs (new use rights certificates) have been delivered
13 land charters developed and adopted
Completion of mass communications and education campaigns
Further legislative reform in support of rural land law
• Many challenges remain, but a variety of donors are eager to
fund continuing implementation of the 2009 rural land law
*Financed by MCC, 2010-2014
19
Benin Access to Land Project*:
The challenge of accounting for secondary land rights
• $34m to secure land rights in
rural and urban areas
• Rural component targeted 300
PFRs consisting of:
- Inventories of primary and
secondary property rights
- Parcels surveyed and
mapped
- Land information systems
established in 40 communes
*Financed by MCC, 2006-2011
PFR
LIS
20
Benin Access to Land Project*:
The challenge of accounting for secondary land rights (2)
•
•
Reluctance for secondary property
rights holders to publically declare
their property rights
But anecdotal accounts of benefits
from transparency and awarenessraising:
- Social pressure for historically
powerful to negotiate
- Encouragement for historically
disadvantaged to press their case
*Financed by MCC, 2006-2011
Women’s group negotiating secondary
rights with customary proprietor
21
Post conflict Burundi: insurmountable challenges?
Challenges:
• Waves of post-war refugees
continue to return to lands occupied
following their departure from
Burundi
• Severe rural population density that
shows few signs of slowing down
(currently less than 0.5 ha/family)
• Preoccupied and under-resourced
central government
• Significant government lands that are
little managed, have unclear
allocation histories and often lack
defined boundaries
Response:
• A new government coordinating unit
established to develop and
implement a national land tenure
program
• Significant donor funded piloting and
expansion of decentralized land
services
• Experimental approaches to land
rights inventorying
• A new national land commission
• A wide variety of willing donors
22
Summary of lessons learned from select countries
with characteristics “similar to Haiti”
•Site-specific knowledge of customary land tenure practices and authority systems is a prerequisite
to achieving land tenure security and good land governance.
•Assist national and local governments to apply existing land tenure policy and legislation (where
appropriate) while accounting for local practices.
-Although policy reform may be needed, in many cases appropriate legislative principles and
tools are already in place but have not been adequately implemented.
-However, balance must be struck between national policy and local customary institutions
and practices to ensure that land rights targeted for formalization are viewed as legitimate.
•Local participation and transparency contribute to more than good land governance, but can also
contribute to socially acceptable distribution of development project benefits and thus sustainability.
•It is both a necessity and challenge to account for “secondary” land property rights when
inventorying land rights.
•Improving land governance is a long-term project that most often exceeds the timeframe of
development projects.
•Sustainability and up-scaling remain as urgent challenges.
23