(2018) Les conditions préalables au financement axé sur les résultats peuvent-elles être établies dans les États fragiles?
Resume — Ce rapport examine les conditions préalables nécessaires à la mise en œuvre du financement axé sur les résultats (FAR) dans les États fragiles, en se concentrant sur le cas d'Haïti. Il met en évidence le développement d'un système d'assurance qualité (SAQ) pour améliorer la gouvernance, renforcer les systèmes de données et établir les bases du FAR dans le secteur de l'éducation. Le rapport souligne l'importance de renforcer les capacités techniques et d'établir des systèmes d'information sur la gestion de l'éducation (SIGE) fonctionnels dans les pays touchés par la fragilité et les conflits.
Constats Cles
- Les mécanismes de FAR sont de plus en plus utilisés pour améliorer les résultats de l'éducation.
- Un SIGE fonctionnel est essentiel pour surveiller et rendre compte avec précision des résultats.
- Haïti est confrontée à des défis dans son secteur de l'éducation, notamment la faiblesse des résultats des élèves.
- Le SAQ vise à aider le MENFP à relever les défis et à lier le financement aux résultats.
- Le SAQ a établi des normes pour les écoles de haute qualité et a déplacé l'attention vers les résultats.
Description Complete
Ce rapport explore la faisabilité de l'établissement de conditions préalables au financement axé sur les résultats (FAR) dans les États fragiles, en utilisant Haïti comme étude de cas. Il détaille les efforts du Fonds fiduciaire « Résultats pour tous les enfants en matière d'éducation » (REACH) pour aider le gouvernement haïtien à développer un système d'assurance qualité (SAQ) pour les écoles primaires. Le SAQ vise à améliorer la gouvernance, à renforcer les systèmes de données pour mesurer les résultats et à créer l'environnement nécessaire à l'introduction du FAR dans le secteur de l'éducation. Le rapport aborde également les défis auxquels est confronté le secteur de l'éducation en Haïti, notamment les taux de scolarisation élevés, mais la faiblesse des résultats des élèves, et le rôle des prestataires privés qui comblent le fossé en raison du manque d'écoles publiques.
Texte Integral du Document
Texte extrait du document original pour l'indexation.
Results-based financing (RBF)
mechanisms such as conditional
cash transfer (CCT) programs,
school grants, and teacher and
school incentives are increasingly
being used around the world to
improve education results and
outcomes and move away from
the procurement of “more of the
same” inputs.
1
However, for RBF to
work, certain preconditions must be
met, the most important of which
is the need to build the technical
capacity of countries to define and
implement RBF mechanisms and
to develop monitoring systems that
measure the results. One of the most
important preconditions of RBF is a
functioning education management
information system (EMIS) so
that results can be accurately
monitored and reported.
2
Without
an EMIS to precisely measure both
learning outcomes and intermediate
indicators of educational quality,
it is impossible for education
ministries to effectively incentivize
improvements.
A crucial question is whether these
types of preconditions can be
established in countries affected by
Can Preconditions for Results-Based Financing
Be Established in Fragile States?
Functional information
systems can be difficult to
establish in countries affected
by fragility and conflict.
Yet, information systems
are important for measuring
learning outcomes and
intermediate indicators of
educational quality.
REACH funded the
development of a
quality assurance
system (QAS) to
help the Government
of Haiti establish
the necessary
preconditions for the
adoption of RBF.
Based on a note provided by Juan Baron and Melissa Adelman
The Results in Education for All Children (REACH) Trust Fund supports and disseminates research on
the impact of results-based financing on learning outcomes. The EVIDENCE series highlights REACH
grants around the world to provide empirical evidence and operational lessons helpful in the design and
implementation of successful performance-based programs.
HAITI
SEPTEMBER 2018
RBF EDUCATION
RESULTS-BASED FINANCING
EVIDENCE
Public Disclosure Authorized
Public Disclosure Authorized
Public Disclosure Authorized
Public Disclosure Authorized
fragility, conflict, and violence (FCV)
as a first step towards implementing
RBF programs in these countries.
Using RBF may be an attractive
option to consider in some FCV
countries given that donor and
local exhaustion may have set in
after decades of investments in
the education sector that have not
produced the expected results.
The flexibility of RBF approaches
also means that they might be the
financing modality that is best suited
to the challenging and ever-changing
environment in FCV countries,
allowing all stakeholders to keep an
eye on desired results while adjusting
the actions being taken to achieve
those results when necessary. This
question is very relevant given the
fragility of institutions and regulatory
frameworks in FCV countries as
well as the weaknesses in their
monitoring and governance systems.
The Results in Education for All
Children (REACH) Trust Fund at the
World Bank provided funding to the
Government of Haiti with the goal
of establishing the preconditions for
the adoption of RBF in the Haitian
National Ministry of Education and
Professional Training (Ministère de
l’Education National et de la Formation
Professionnelle, MENFP). To this end,
the grant funded the development
of a quality assurance system (QAS)
based on specific standards for
the most important dimensions of
educational quality in the country.
The idea was to include clear
indicators for each quality dimension
that would make it possible to
measure education results on the
ground. The grant also funded a
series of complementary activities
aimed at strengthening the technical
capacity of MENFP staff to define
and measure quality. By developing
a QAS for all primary schools in the
country, the grant aimed to improve
governance, enhance the data
systems needed to measure results,
and establish the preconditions
necessary to introduce an RBF
mechanism in the education sector
in Haiti.
CONTEXT
Although there have been
considerable increases in enrollment
in recent years, the education sector
in Haiti still faces many challenges.
3
The net primary enrollment rate
rose from about 60 percent in the
early 2000s to between 70 and 80
percent in 2012.
4
Because there
are not enough public schools to
meet this increased demand, private
providers have stepped in to fill the
gap and now operate over 80 percent
of primary schools.
5
However, there
is little oversight of these providers
nor are they held accountable for the
quality of their teaching or learning.
The public sector plays a similarly
limited role in both the provision
and regulation of all other levels of
education as well.
The Government of Haiti has been
able to raise enrollment rates by
making increasing access to primary
education one of its top funding
priorities. The government has been
financing tuition waivers for students
attending private schools through
the donor-funded Education for All
(Éducation Pour Tous, EPT) Project
and its Tuition Waiver Program since
Haiti
With over 80 percent
of primary schools
operated privately,
there is little oversight
to maintain quality.
2 RFB EDUCATION | EVIDENCE
2007 and through the government-
funded Universal, Free, and Obligatory
Education Program (Programme de
Scolarisation Universelle, Gratuite,
et Obligatoire, PSUGO) since 2011.
At their peak between 2011 and
2014, these two programs financed
the school fees of over 60 percent
of all primary students in Haiti,
with PSUGO accounting for about
20 percent of domestic public
spending on education.
6
However,
these gains in access are at risk as
these programs have not yet been
established as a permanent part of
Haiti’s education system.
Despite these gains in enrollment,
student achievement remains
very weak. The average Haitian
child enters first grade nearly two
years late due to a combination of
household financial constraints and
restrictive school policies that require
children to receive at least one year
of pre-primary education in order to
prepare for first grade. Once in school,
13 percent of first graders repeat the
year, and only about half will reach
the sixth grade. Student learning is
also very weak. For example, a 2016
nationally representative early grade
reading assessment found that 42
percent of students near the end
of their second-grade year could
not read a single word of Haitian
Creole.
7
Furthermore, a 2015 fourth
grade math assessment by the
MENFP in public and private schools
found that student scores were
only slightly better than random
guessing. This shows that the
learning crisis has also affected the
Haitian education system.
8
The idea behind the QAS was to
help the MENFP to tackle some
of the toughest challenges in the
sector and to develop a system
that would make it possible to link
financing to results in the future.
The QAS would be designed to
cover both public and private
primary schools. The approach
also included complementary
activities to strengthen the
technical capacity of MENFP staff
to develop the QAS—in particular,
to establish standards for learning
conditions and for student
learning, as well as diagnostic
assessments linked to those
standards.
Although the MENFP was already
putting substantial emphasis on
improving the quality of education,
different actors had different
definitions of quality. It was critical
to establish a consensus on a
definition of educational quality before
specific learning standards could be
developed. Since multiple previous
attempts to develop accreditation
systems for non-public schools had
failed, the work under the REACH
grant focused on developing a
definition of quality that would apply
to both public and non-public schools.
The final QAS design addressed
several issues, starting with the
WHY WAS THE INTERVENTION CHOSEN?
HAITI 3
definition of learning standards.
Standards of learning were defined to
prioritize the most important elements
of the curriculum and ensure that any
learning assessment that is developed
is aligned with the curriculum. The
QAS also established the necessary
tools to measure the school learning
conditions—outputs and intermediate
outcomes—that are needed to improve
learning. By establishing systems
to collect data on learning inputs
and outcomes, the QAS would be
setting the stage for strengthening
the monitoring and evaluation of
interventions such as the tuition
waiver programs and to increase the
accountability of both private and
public schools. The establishment of
the QAS would also provide donors
and policymakers with the data that
they needed to measure progress and
results and to target interventions.
To increase the capacity of the
MENFP, the World Bank team in Haiti
worked with the ministry to identify
and carry out specific tasks that
would lead to the development of
the QAS. The process of building this
capacity was intended to emphasize
the MENFP’s ownership of each
activity and to increase the likelihood
that it would sustain the QAS over
time. It also brought together diverse
stakeholders and incentivized them
to coordinate their work. The QAS
was also intended to empower local
actors to get more involved in the
decisions that impact learning in
schools, to prioritize resource use, to
increase government accountability,
and to meet the local population’s
most urgent needs.
By developing a QAS for all primary
schools in the country, the REACH
Trust Fund hoped to improve
governance, enhance data systems
to measure results, and establish the
preconditions necessary to put in
place an RBF mechanism to improve
the quality of education in Haiti.
HOW DID THE
INTERVENTION
WORK?
The QAS was developed by
the MENFP through a series
of workshops, meetings, and
continuous technical assistance
from the World Bank. The developers
took into account relevant
international experiences that
could be appropriately adapted to
the Haitian context and built on
technical work done by the MENFP
and other partners. So far, what
has been accomplished includes:
(a) the development of an officially
endorsed framework for educational
quality with a holistic perspective
that includes conditions for learning
in schools and student learning
outcomes; (b) the creation of
validated measurement instruments
for assessing the quality of learning;
and (c) a nationally representative
pilot test of these instruments that
will yield baseline measurements
for the system. The QAS is now the
guiding framework for providing
support to both public and
private primary schools under the
IDA-financed Providing an Education
of Quality in Haiti (PEQH) Project and
is likely to be used by other donors to
channel financing to schools as well.
An important aspect of the REACH
grant was to strengthen the capacity
of the MENFP to collect and analyze
education data. The REACH funds
have been used to reinforce the
statistical and information functions
executed by the ministry’s Directorate
of Planning and External Coordination
(Direction de la Planification et de
la Coordination Externe, DPCE). In
particular, REACH is supporting a
coordinated effort among donors
and MENFP directorates to build
and sustain a functional EMIS. Using
frameworks developed by the World
Bank’s Systems Approach for Better
Education Results (SABER) initiative,
REACH funds were used to carry out
a diagnostic to identify strengths
and weaknesses in data collection
and information management in
the Haitian education sector and to
support the MENFP’s design for an
EMIS. A grant from the Trust Fund for
Statistical Capacity Building, as well
as IDA funds under the PEQH Project,
will be used to implement this design.
REACH funds have also been
used to strengthen the capacity of
The QAS aimed to help
the government improve
governance and enhance data
systems by including both
public and private schools.
4 RFB EDUCATION | EVIDENCE
MENFP staff to define standards for
learning conditions and to develop
assessments to measure conditions
in schools against these standards.
These standards define quality
education in five dimensions: (a) the
school principal’s leadership; (b) the
school environment; (c) pedagogical
management and support; (d) the
management of human and physical
resources; and (e) community
participation. The standards for
each of these dimensions are
described in Table 1.
An important goal of the QAS
was to build Haiti’s capacity to
measure student learning in
primary education. To achieve this,
the REACH grant also supported
workshops attended by international
and national experts, teachers,
and MENFD staff to develop
learning standards aligned with
the curriculum and funded an
accompanying assessment of third
grade reading in Haitian Creole.
These learning standards were
added to the QAS to provide clear
milestones for the development of
reading skills in the third grade. These
standards can also be used to develop
assessments to strengthen the
capacity of teachers to assess their
own students, to measure learning in
a transparent and technically sound
way, and to adjust their pedagogical
improvement plans. These standards
were defined across five levels of
learning as seen in Table 2.
Table 1. Standard for Each of the Dimensions of School Quality in Haiti
Quality dimension Dimension description
D1
School principal leadership
School principals focus their practices towards student learning, thus requiring that they monitor results and
carry out a strategic and planned vision.
D2
School environment
The school, the administration, and teachers follow procedures and practices that are clear in terms of the
organization, preparation, implementation and evaluation of teaching, considering the needs of all students by
taking concrete actions so that students achieve their learning objectives and reach their potential.
D3
Pedagogical Management
and Support
The school has policies, procedures, and strategies in place that favor an environment that is respectful,
organized, safe, and appropriate for student learning and the school community. Additionally, the school supports
and promotes the spiritual, ethical, moral, emotional, and physical development of its students.
D4
Management of Human
and physical resources
The school has policies, procedures, strategies, and practices in place for the management of its staff and
educational resources.
D5
Community Participation
The school has presents policies, procedures, strategies, and practices in place for creating and developing the
participation of stakeholders within the educational community.
Table 2: Five Levels of Learning
Levels of learning Description
Advanced Pupils can make simple inferences: they are able to draw conclusions that are obvious, to find the meaning or
subject of a theme or main idea of a text, to make inferences that an event is the cause of another one, to make
simple inferences regarding the main characters, their attributes, feelings, or motivations, and are able to relate
two pieces of information contained in two adjacent sentences.
High Pupils can collect explicit information in a text: they are able to identify a word or idea already mentioned in a text
and are able to retrieve information in a word or in a sentence.
Average Pupils can read words and short sentences: they can recognize the image corresponding to the sentence or word
that they read by themselves, identify the words read aloud by the teacher, and identify words written in uppercase
or lowercase.
Low Pupils can recognize letters and syllables: they are able to recognize images corresponding to short oral
messages (a sentence or a word), to recognize syllables, to identify letters written in upper and lower case,
to identify the first letter of a word and the initial sound of a word, as well as written characters among other
symbols (such as numbers or signs).
Below Average Pupils at this level do not demonstrate the skills measured by this test in Creole. These pupils have difficulties
with the knowledge and skills at the low level.
HAITI 5
School performance in Haiti
varies significantly across the five
dimensions of educational quality.
To assess progress towards the
achievement of educational quality
standards for each school, a set
of questionnaires were developed,
pre-piloted, and piloted in 2016 and
2017, one for school principals, one
for teachers, and one for school
characteristics. The data collected by
these questionnaires was aggregated
into a school’s profile consisting of
the school’s scores on indicators that
provide an overview of its level of
development in each dimension. The
average school performance ranged
from 28 percent in the “Management
of Human and Physical Resources”
dimension to 62 percent in the “School
Environment” dimension (Figure 1).
These school profiles, in combination
with measurements of learning, will
be valuable inputs into the school
improvement plans (SIPs) that each
school is required to develop with the
participation of their local community.
There is potential for policymakers
to use RBF to encourage schools to
achieve the goals set out in their plans
as measured by the indicators in the
QAS. Some of these improvements
might actually be inputs, such as
constructing proper facilities for
learning (as in Dimension 2. School
Environment). While school facilities
are often strictly a final outcome, the
lack of proper classrooms and latrines
can prevent students from being able
to effectively attend school and learn.
The assessment of third grade
student learning in Haitian Creole
was piloted in 20 schools in Port-au-
Prince in 2017. Almost 70 percent of
students in the pilot had an “Average”
level of reading skill or lower (Figure 2).
Only 2 percent of students in the pilot
were at the “Advanced” level, which is
defined as having the skills expected
by the official third grade curriculum,
including being able to recognize
letters and syllables, to read words
and short sentences, to collect explicit
information in a text, and to make
simple inferences. In other words, if
third grade students were reading at
the expected third grade level, most
students would have exhibited the
“Advanced” level of reading in the
assessment.
WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?
Figure 1: Average School Scores
in the Pre-Pilot
01020304050607080
D5
D4
D3
D2
D1
Quality dimension
Achievement of standard (%)
Figure 2: Students’ Competencies in
Reading (Creole) (Pre-Pilot Data)
Percentage of students (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
HighAdvanced AverageLowBelow low
Competency level
6 RFB EDUCATION | EVIDENCE
WHAT WERE
THE LESSONS
LEARNED?
The QAS has established standards
for what a high-quality school should
look like in multiple dimensions.
This has helped to move the
dialogue away from focusing
on enrollment numbers, inputs,
and vague pronouncements on
the state of education towards a
constructive discussion about what
is working and what is not and how
improvements can be made.
It has also shifted the focus of the
policy and technical dialogues in
Haiti away from inputs and towards
results and helped the MENFP
to envision how to improve the
quality of education to the benefit of
Haiti’s children. While development
organizations tend to focus on
student learning as the ultimate and
most important outcome, it is very
difficult to “move the needle” and
substantially boost learning in an
enduring way without understanding
and addressing the complex and
interrelated aspects of what makes
a good school. The QAS assesses
not only student learning outcomes
but also the intermediate indicators
that make up the learning conditions
within each school, including the
quality of the infrastructure, teaching,
school leadership, and the overall
interpersonal climate.
Given the prevalence of private
schools in Haiti and the long history
of weak public sector management,
the QAS is also acting as a guiding
framework through which the
government can both improve the
quality of public service delivery (by
prioritizing its spending according to
clearly identified needs) and regulate
the private sector (by making public
financing conditional on schools
meeting high quality standards).
The continued interest and
engagement that the World Bank
team has experienced from
the MENFP and other sector
stakeholders demonstrates that
there was clearly a substantial latent
demand for a dialogue on results.
The development of the QAS is
helping to legitimize the MENFP’s
efforts to regulate the education
sector by creating clear, specific, and
realistic standards that will apply to
both public and private schools.
At the same time, moving towards
RBF is a process that will take time
and multiple iterations. Creating
a sustained consensus about
quality standards despite shifting
priorities and political pressures
will require ongoing technical
assistance, dialogue, and knowledge
sharing. Moreover, the QAS is a
work in progress, as the realities of
implementation mean that the tools
and approaches must be regularly
adjusted and refined to make them
work on the ground.
Based on the experience of
developing the QAS in Haiti, it seems
that successfully implementing
RBF in a low-income, fragile country
requires at least three elements:
(a) laying the groundwork for defining
and measuring educational quality,
as the World Bank team in Haiti has
done over the past two years, and
remaining persistent despite the
inevitable setbacks and slowdowns
that come from instability, shifting
priorities, and emergencies on
the ground; (b) recognizing that
“results” can often include what we
often dismiss as “inputs,” which
can actually matter a great deal for
a school’s learning outcomes (for
example, having decent, functional
latrines); and (c) recognizing that
many low-income countries may
already have policies that define
fairly lofty ideals for standards
but that having a dialogue on RBF
can actually be more useful than
introducing aspirational outcomes
for bringing policy closer to reality.
The QAS has been able to
shift the focus of policy
and technical dialogues in
Haiti away from inputs and
towards results and helped
the Ministry understand
how to improve the quality
of education.
HAITI 7
CONCLUSION
The set of activities funded by
REACH successfully created a quality
assurance system (QAS) in Haiti
that collects information on five
dimensions of learning conditions in
schools, provides schools with clear
standards to meet, and gives them
information about their progress
towards reaching these standards.
Now that this information is being
measured by the QAS, policymakers
can decide to offer monetary
incentives to schools, teachers, or
other relevant stakeholders to make
the necessary efforts to improve
these learning conditions and
outcomes. REACH also supported the
development of learning standards
for reading in Haitian Creole. The QAS
data collection instruments have been
piloted and revised and have become
important tools for measuring
educational quality in Haiti.
These activities have had several
benefits: (a) they have increased
the Haitian government’s capacity
to measure educational quality; (b)
they have advanced the technical
design and piloting of accreditation
processes and improved the
governance and regulation of the
school system; (c) they have made
it easier to target programs to
address schools’ needs based on
the best available data; (d) they have
empowered local actors (such as
school leaders, principals, teachers,
and parent associations) to become
more involved in school decisions;
and (e) they have established the
foundation for introducing an RBF
mechanism to incentivize school
improvement. By establishing
the QAS in Haiti as a reliable
mechanism for measuring learning
and intermediate indicators of
educational quality, REACH has
shown that the preconditions for RBF
can be established in FCV countries.
1 World Bank. 2015. The Rise of Results-Based Financing in Education. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Brief/Education/RBF_ResultsBasedFinancing_v9_web.pdf
2 Holland, Peter A. and Jessica D. Lee. 2017. Results-Based Financing in Education: Financing Results to Strengthen Systems. Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/715791489054110215/pdf/113265-REVISED-RBF-Approach-Final-Digital-Apr21.pdf
3 Adelman, Melissa A., Juan Baron, and David Evans, 2016. Why school enrollment is not enough: A look inside Haiti’s classrooms. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
https://medium.com/world-of-opportunity/why-school-enrollment-is-not-enough-a-look-inside-haitis-classrooms-34780e9614c7
4 World Bank. 2015. Better spending, better services—a review of public finances in Haiti (English). Public expenditure review (PER). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/246141467030212959/Better-spending-better-services-a-review-of-public-finances-in-Haiti
5 Observatoire National de la Pauvreté et de l’Exclusion Sociale. 2014. Investing in People to Fight Poverty in Haiti: Reflections for Evidence-based Policy Making. World Bank,
Washington, .DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/21519
6 Adelman, Melissa A. and Peter A. Holland, 2015. Increasing access by waiving tuition: evidence from Haiti (English). Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 7175. Washington,
DC: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/823841468035508642/Increasing-access-by-waiving-tuition-evidence-from-Haiti
7 Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale et de la Formation Professionnelle. 2016. Évaluation des apprentissages de base en lecture des élèves de la deuxième année fondamentale.
8 World Bank. 2018. World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, D.C: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1.
PHOTO CREDITS:
Cover: “Education in Haiti” by GPE/Chantal Rigaud, license: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Page 3: “Source de la Grace Jumecourt Children’s Village, SDLG” by The Global Orphan Project, license: CC BY 2.0
Page 6: “Pre-primary section of the Ecole mixte de la Convention baptiste de Hinche” by GPE/Chantal Rigaud, license: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Page 7: “Education in Hati: Collège Mixte Joinvil in Port au Prince” by GPE/Chantal Rigaud, license: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
RESULTS IN EDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN (REACH)
REACH is funded by the Government of Norway through NORAD, the Government
of the United States of America through USAID, and the Government of Germany
through the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development.
worldbank.org/reach
reach@worldbank.org