(2009) Apporter l'ESPOIR à l'industrie du vêtement en Haïti : Améliorer la compétitivité grâce à l'analyse de la chaîne de valeur au niveau de l'usine

Bringing HOPE to Haiti’s Apparel Industry Improving Competitiveness through Factory-level Value-chain Analysis November 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized II BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY Bringing HOPE to Haiti’s Apparel Industry Improving Competitiveness through Factory-level Value-chain Analysis PREPARED FOR Commission Tripartite de la Mise en Oeuvre de la Loi HOPE (CTMO-HOPE) as part of a technical assistance program led by the World Bank with funding from the Multidonor Trust Fund for Trade and Development SUBMITTED BY Nathan Associates Inc. November 2009 Cover photo © Marc Lee Steed for the Association of Haitian Industries CONTENTS III Contents Glossary vii Acknowledgments xi Executive Summary xiii 1. Introduction 1 Apparel Industries Worldwide 2 Apparel Value-Chain Elements 5 U.S. Apparel Trade Trends 7 Labor Rights in Apparel Industries 9 Report Organization 12 2. Apparel Trade Program Benefits and Trade Flows 13 Comparison of Benefits Under HOPE, CBTPA, and DR-CAFTA 13 Haiti‘s Trade With the United States 19 3. Overview of Haiti’s Apparel Industry 23 Institutional Players 23 History 25 Factories, Ownership, and Industrial Zones 28 Government Support to Encourage Exports 30 Range of Products and Customers 31 Factory Size 32 Investment Intentions 34 Ports and Shipping 34 Haiti‘s Labor Sector 35 4. Haitian Apparel Industry Cost Analysis 41 Factory-Level Cost Analysis 42 Benchmarking Haiti‘s Costs 43 IV BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY Productivity 50 Product Cost Analysis: Men‘s Chinos Trousers 52 Product Cost Analysis: Men‘s T-Shirts 52 Summary of Apparel Cost Analysis 59 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 61 Appendix A. Composition of CTMO-HOPE Appendix B. Haiti’s Apparel Manufacturers Appendix C. Comparison of Benefits under Trade Agreements Appendix D. Meetings Appendix E. Sources Consulted ILLUSTRATIONS Figures Figure 1-1. Apparel Industry Value-Chain, Global and in Haiti 5 Figure 1-2. Regional Sources of Supply to U.S. Apparel Market 9 Figure 2-1. Value of Haiti's Exports ($US Millions) 20 Figure 3-1. Key Institutional Players Shaping Haiti’s Apparel Industry 25 Figure 3-2. Ownership in Haiti’s Apparel Industry 28 Figure 3-3. Haiti Population Pyramid, 2009 36 Figure 4-1. Chinos, FOB Costs 58 Figure 4-2. Chinos, CIF Costs (Including Duties Paid) 58 Figure 4-3. T-Shirts, FOB Costs 59 Figure 4-4. T-Shirts, CIF Costs (Including Duties Paid) 59 Tables Table 1-1. Summary of Strategic Initiatives in Haiti 3 Table 1-2. U.S. Apparel Imports, Top 25 Suppliers ($US Million) 8 Table 2-1. Haiti‘s Leading Trade Partners ($US Thousands) 18 Table 2-2. Value of Haiti‘s Exports ($US Millions) 20 Table 2-3. U.S. Apparel Imports Under Trade Preference Programs 21 Table 2-4. Haitian Factories‘ Reported Export Destinations 22 Table 2-5. U.S. Apparel Imports Under HOPE 22 CONTENTS V Table 3-1. Key Actors and Policy and Market Variables Influenced 26 Table 3-2. Haiti‘s Political History and Global and U.S. Apparel Trade Developments 27 Table 3-3. Fabric Sourcing Patterns (Number of factories) 32 Table 3-4. Factory Size, by Number of Sewing Machines 33 Table 3-5. Factory Size, By Employees 33 Table 3-6. Factory Investment Priorities (Number of factories) 34 Table 4-1. Factory-level Cost Analysis Per Product 42 Table 4-2. Cost Comparison 44 Table 4-3. Labor Cost Comparison (January–June 2009) 45 Table 4-4. Comparison of Tax Incentives 50 Table 4-5. Productivity Targets, Casual Pants or Jeans 51 Table 4-6. Cost Analysis: Men‘s Chino Trousers 54 Table 4-7. Cost Analysis: Men‘s T-Shirts 56 Table 5-1. Strategic Considerations for the Apparel Industry 64 Exhibits Exhibit 3-1. Haiti’s Apparel Companies 24 Glossary ADIH Association des Industries d‘Haïti (Association of Haitian Industries) AGOA African Growth and Opportunity Act BASC Business Alliance for Secure Commerce BC Beneficiary country/countries BFC Better Factories Cambodia BSR Business for Social Responsibility BTA Bilateral textile agreement C. Convention CBERA Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act CBTPA Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act CBI Caribbean Basin Initiative CFI Centre de Facilitation des Investissments (Center for Investment Facilitation) CFPO Centre de Promotion des Femmes Ouvrieres (Center for Promotion of Women Workers) CIF Costs plus insurance and freight CLED Centre pour la Libre Entreprise et la Démocratie (Center for Free Enterprise and Democracy) CMT Cut, make, and trim CODEVI Compagnie pour le Développement Industriel (Industrial Development Company) CSH Coordination Syndicale Haïtienne (Haitian Union Coordination) CTH Conféderation des Travailleurs Haïtiens (Confederation of Haitian Workers) CTMO-HOPE Commission Tripartite de Mise en Oeuvre de la Loi HOPE CWG Competitiveness Working Group DR Dominican Republic DR-CAFTA Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement DSNCRP Document de Stratégie Nationale pour la Croissance et la Réduction de la Pauvreté (National Strategy for Growth and Poverty Reduction) DZF Direction des Zones Franches (Free Zone Department, of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry) VIII BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY EDH Electricité d‘Haïti (Haitian Electricity Authority) ELVIS Electronic Visa Information System ENAM Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers (National School for the Arts and Handicrafts) FIAS Foreign Investment Advisory Service FOB Free on board FTA Free trade agreement FTZ Free trade zone GAL Guaranteed access level GDP Gross domestic product GSP Generalized System of Preferences GTC Groupe de Travail sur la Competitivité (Competitiveness Working Group) HOPE Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act HTG Haitian Gourde HTS Harmonized Tariff System IADB Inter-American Development Bank IFC International Finance Corporation IHSI Institut Haitien de Statistique et d‘Informatique ILO International Labor Organization ISPS International Ship and Port Facility Security Code ITUC International Trade Union Confederation KwH Kilowatt-hour LDP Landed duty paid LM Linear meter MFA Multilateral Fibre Arrangement MINUSTAH United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti MMF Man-made fiber MOISE Mouvement des Organisations Indépendentes Intégrées and des Syndicats Engagés (Movement of Independent, Integrated Organizations and Engaged Unions) MPCE Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation MAST Ministère des Affaires Sociales et du Travail (Ministry of Social Affairs and Labor) NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement QIZ Qualifying industrial zone SME Square meter equivalent SONAPI Société Nationale des Parcs Industriels (National Industrial Parks Company) TAICNAR Technical Assistance Improvement and Compliance Needs Assessment and Remediation program TEU Twenty-foot equivalent unit GLOSSARY IX TPL Tariff preference level TRQ Tariff-rate quota USAID U.S. Agency for International Development USCBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection USTR Office of the U.S. Trade Representative VAT Value-added tax WRAP Worldwide Responsible Apparel Production WTO World Trade Organization Acknowledgments Sponsored by the World Bank‘s Latin America and Caribbean Economic Policy Sector Unit and conducted at the request of Haiti‘s Commission Tripartite de Mise en Oeuvre de la Loi HOPE (hereafter, CTMO-HOPE), this study received generous financial support from the governments of Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom through the Multidonor Trust Fund for Trade and Development. This study was carried out under the guidance of the World Bank and CTMO-HOPE. The World Bank team consisted of Yolanda Strachan (PRMTR), Emmanuel Pinto Moreira (LCSPE), and Luc Razamifandimby (LCSPE). The analysis was undertaken by Nathan Associates Inc. and its partners, Werner International and the Centre pour la Libre Entreprise et la Démocratie (CLED). The report was prepared by Don Feeney of Werner International, and Lynn Salinger and Jane O‘Dell of Nathan Associates. Industry survey data were collected and analyzed by Jean-Robert Joseph, a consultant to CLED, assisted by Allison Russell and Emma Fawcett, summer interns from the New School for Social Research (New York). The authors would like to express their gratitude to the factories whose senior managers explained company operations and who provided us with extensive detail on income and expenditures. To preserve confidentiality, sources of cost data are not named here and company data have been adjusted in the report so that individual companies cannot be directly identified. The authors are especially grateful to ADIH‘s Georges Sassine for arranging our access to factories, CTMO-HOPE‘s Lionel Delatour for his fervent conviction of the importance of this work and his commitment to the industry, and CLED for providing the highest quality of support during our stay in Haiti. Together, their efforts ensured that our work was brilliantly organized, without which this report could not have been completed. The authors are also grateful for comments received from Cornelia Staritz, Paul Brenton, Thomas Farole, and Ian Gillson, Briana N. Wilson, Robert Krech, and Jean-Louis Warnholz. Executive Summary Thirty years ago, Haiti‘s apparel industry was a reliable supplier of assembled goods to the U.S. market and employed as many as 100,000 workers. Chances were pretty good that U.S. baseball pitchers were throwing balls sewn in Haiti, and that U.S. children were sleeping in pajamas sewn in Haiti. The intervening years have been difficult for Haiti, marked by a struggle to stabilize governance, to institutionalize respect for political and human rights, to modernize infrastructure, and to encourage environmental stewardship rebuild after decades under the poor leadership of the Duvaliers (1957–1986). Meanwhile, businesses around the world have built supply chains that deliver raw materials from the most efficient capital-intensive economies for processing in the most productive labor-intensive economies. The global economy has rewritten the rules of trade, eliminated quotas on textiles and apparel, and spawned preferential arrangements and free trade agreements across multiple geopolitical partnerships. In this context, what trade advantages, if any, does Haiti‘s apparel industry have and what are its strengths? In 2008, the United States—one of the world‘s largest consumer markets despite the current economic recession—extended trade preferences to Haiti. The Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act, or HOPE II, grants Haitian apparel exports duty-free entry into the United States. At the same time, Haiti remains a beneficiary under the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA). HOPE II allows Haitian apparel factories flexible use of third-country materials in production, subject to value-added requirements and quantitative limits (expiring in 2011) and quantitative limits only for woven and knit apparel (expiring in 2018). To stimulate textile industry development and regional trade integration, CBTPA extends benefits to garments made from fabrics produced in the region of U.S. yarn. Together, HOPE II and CBTPA give Haiti an advantage over all other U.S. trade partners in the most valued trade benefit for apparel: the right to use fabrics produced outside its borders—whether from the United States, U.S. trade agreement and trade preference partners, or third countries—to manufacture apparel, export it to the United States, and qualify for duty-free benefits. HOPE II grants Haitian apparel exports duty- free entry into the United States. XIV BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY In designing HOPE II, U.S. lawmakers provided maximum flexibility and required that apparel factories respect labor rights—such as rights to organize, bargain collectively, and be free of employment discrimination—in order to qualify for benefits. As mandated by HOPE II, Better Work, a multicountry program managed by the International Labor Organization and the International Finance Corporation, was recently established in Haiti as the Technical Assistance Improvement and Compliance Needs Assessment and Remediation (TAICNAR) program . In addition, the legislation includes a provision that apparel produced in Haiti can be exported from the Dominican Republic to the United States. This accommodates goods produced in Haiti along the Haitian–Dominican border in the free trade zone at Ouanaminthe. Foreign investors are taking notice of the rebirth of Haiti‘s apparel industry. The industry currently employs only 25,000, but 23 companies—all but one in Port-au-Prince—manufacture a wide assortment of clothing items. Ten of these companies represent Dominican, Korean, and U.S. investors, and several have indicated their intention to expand their workforces. Brazilian investors also seem eager to invest in Haiti. CODEVI, Haiti‘s largest single apparel factory and the only one outside Port-au-Prince, represents an experiment in Haiti. Owned by Grupo M of the Dominican Republic, the factory is located in a free trade zone on the Dominican border, employs between 3,700 and 4,000 workers and is ready to add several hundred more, and is the only apparel factory in Haiti whose workers are represented by a labor union. Electricity, telecommunications, and transport to and from ports are all provided in the Dominican Republic. In Haiti, ―free trade zones‖ and ―industrial zones‖ qualify for similar benefits and support. Haiti‘s investment laws allow for temporary admission of raw materials needed for export-oriented industries, and customs officials work effectively with manufacturers to ensure timely inspection of containers at the factories. Aside from the generous terms of access to the U.S. market under HOPE II, Haiti‘s labor force is its biggest asset—in terms of cost and quality. The low minimum wage of 70 Haitian Gourdes ($1.75) per day that was in effect during the study period was raised to 125 HTG ($3.13) on October 1, 2009, with further increases scheduled in October 2010 (150 HTG) and October 2012 (200 HTG). Total earnings of workers in the apparel industry, inclusive of production quota bonuses, are in excess of the minimum wage today. While not the lowest worldwide, these labor costs are competitive with regional and global benchmarks. Just as important, Haiti‘s apparel workers are eager for steady employment and are reliable—despite low wages and high costs associated with employment (e.g., transport to and from work, meals away from home, occupational health concerns, workplace stresses). Absenteeism and turnover are both low at 2 percent and 4-6 percent per year, respectively. And in late 2009, a training center being designed with input from [TC] 2 , a leading U.S. center for applied apparel industry research and training will begin training sewing operators and mid- level personnel for what is expected to be an expanding labor force. Forty percent of Haiti’s apparel factories are foreign-owned or joint ventures. Haiti’s labor force is its biggest asset— in terms of cost and quality. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY XV To take full advantage of its trade agreements and its solid, reliable workforce, Haiti‘s apparel industry has to meet challenges in general infrastructure, factory productivity, and international image. First, the two most commonly cited infrastructure constraints are unreliable and costly electricity and the dwindling supply of available industrial space. Electricity costs for industrial users are an extremely high 23 U.S. cents per kilowatt-hour—well above regional and global benchmarks, and soon to be increased by the Haitian Electricity Authority. Unless curbed by special tariffs, these costs will discourage development of a textile industry, a longstanding dream of planners in Haiti‘s apparel industry. Industrial space is reportedly still available in Port-au-Prince—some 100,000 square meters were said to be open in August 2009. But with urban areas growing at rates three times that of the overall population, Haiti needs to plan for its future now and consider which other coastal towns might provide platforms for industry development. Donors are addressing these constraints by working to improve energy sector governance, electrical generation capacity, and electrical distribution security, and to plan and finance new industrial parks in Port-au-Prince and elsewhere, such as in Cap-Haïtien. The World Bank and International Finance Corporation are financing efforts to reduce losses and expand supply in the energy sector, and the Inter- American Development Bank will fund strategic planning for expansion of industrial space. Second, compared to global industry ―standard times‖ the productivity of Haiti‘s apparel operations is low. Many factories operate at 35 to 40 percent of standard. In a well-run factory, productivity rates are between 60 and 75 percent of standard, as consistently achieved in various countries. The current challenge for Haiti‘s industry is to increase its levels to 50 percent of standard, or better. Third, Haiti‘s apparel firms have a reputation as being little more than T- shirt manufacturers—but in reality they manufacture a surprising range of fairly complex products. Most are made of 100 percent cotton fabrics, but factories also work with woolens and manmade fiber fabrics. Factories operate as cut-make- trim companies, subcontractors, and even full-package service companies. Some have automatic fabric spreading or computer-aided cutting or manufacturing facilities, others offer their own pattern marker and embroidery capabilities. They produce for a wide range of clients in North America, including two well-known undergarment and activewear companies (Hanes and Gildan) and a wide variety of fashion, performance, active, and work wear companies. In fact, none of the following points of ―common wisdom‖ about the industry are true: Haiti only makes T-shirts and workers lack the skills to do more. In fact, Haitian operators are skilled in needle work and produce a wide range of products, even tailored men‘s suits. Haitian firms dominate the local apparel industry. Haiti already attracts foreign investors to its industry. Forty percent of companies are joint ventures or foreign owned. Electricity costs for industrial users are well above regional and global benchmarks. Haiti’s apparel firms should increase productivity to 50 percent of standard, or better. XVI BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY Hanes and Gildan dominate Haiti’s commercial landscape. These two renowned North American brands are significant, but are better viewed as anchors in a diversified customer network. Haiti’s factories only assemble garments from knit cotton fabric sourced from the Dominican Republic. Haiti‘s factories source fabric from all over the world, manufacturing garments of cotton, manmade fiber, wool, and other fabrics. Haiti’s apparel factories only provide cut, make, and trim services. A number of Haiti‘s factories offer specialized sourcing and production services. Haiti’s apparel industry is not yet taking advantage of HOPE. Haiti‘s apparel firms are responding to HOPE II trade opportunities, and the relative share shipped under HOPE has increased significantly in 2009. These are significant findings. Haiti‘s apparel industry presents global investors and apparel buyers advantages and challenges. On balance, prospects are quite good, with the industry likely to expand, perhaps even double, in the coming two years. No other supplier matches Haiti for its wages, trainable and dedicated workforce, trade preferences into the U.S. market, and physical proximity to customers (hence, short delivery times to market). Our findings on production costs also bode well for the industry‘s competitiveness. Haiti‘s apparel companies are profitable and able to attract business—and are expanding as a result. Average pay levels in Haiti‘s apparel companies are high, and electricity costs paid by the industry are high but manageable. In most firms, productivity levels are a concern; improving worker nutrition may be one simple way to boost productivity. Haiti‘s apparel industry is starting to grow again. Business, labor, and government leaders recognize the importance of the industry to economic growth and poverty reduction, and appear ready to ensure that HOPE II leads to meaningful economic activity, employment, and improved welfare for Haitians. To help ensure such an outcome, Haiti should consider all possible niches it might fill in the global industry. Factories should commit to achieving higher productivity and to using various production management methods to smooth workflow through factory production lines without unduly taxing production personnel. Mindful of the TAICNAR program‘s focus on labor rights compliance and remediation, the industry should prepare now for unionization among a larger share of the apparel workforce. Private electricity generation capacity and industrial zone space, in Port-au-Prince and possibly in Cap-Haïtien, should be pursued. Finally, the energy and enthusiasm of Haiti‘s industry, labor, and government leaders, engaged through Commission Tripartite de Mise en Oeuvre de la Loi HOPE (CTMO-HOPE), should be tapped in shaping a new image for Haiti‘s apparel industry abroad. Haitian firms are skilled in needle work and produce a wide range of products, even tailored men’s suits. Haiti’s apparel firms are responding to HOPE II trade opportunities. 1. Introduction In October 2008 the United States Congress enacted legislation that gave the Republic of Haiti expanded, flexible access to the U.S. market for its apparel exports. The Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2008 (HOPE II, updated from the original legislation passed in 2006) was welcomed for its potential to revitalize a decaying industry, attract new foreign investment, expand formal sector employment, and jumpstart growth and opportunity for Haiti‘s people. A presidential commission, the Commission Tripartite de Mise en Oeuvre de la Loi HOPE (CTMO-HOPE), works to ensure successful implementation of the legislation. 1 The purpose of the analysis of Haiti‘s apparel value-chain in this report is to provide a comprehensive view of the advantages and challenges of manufacturing in Haiti relative to manufacturing in the Caribbean and Central America and elsewhere. It situates Haiti‘s attributes and suggests priorities for improving its competitiveness relative to that of other suppliers. An apparel buyer in the United States today juggles an impressive list of potential suppliers from China and elsewhere in Asia and from Latin America and beyond. Each country offers a unique combination of workforce skills, business environment, costs, ―full-package‖ services, proximity to raw material or to end markets, preferential access to the U.S. market, and thus competitiveness. This report helps readers to see how Haiti fits into this ever-changing global apparel market kaleidoscope. Research for this analysis was conducted using a combination of instruments, including (1) a structured survey questionnaire, in which three-quarters of the industry participated; 2 (2) detailed cost analysis for two standard products made in Haiti—knit T-shirts and woven men‘s ―chinos‖ trousers—using cost data collected from nine firms; and (3) rapid appraisal interviews of representatives of Haiti‘s apparel industry and its broader private sector, Haiti‘s labor sector, donor organizations and donor-funded programs, and government, to understand the policy and business environments in which the industry operates. Field work took place between July 20 and August 15, 2009. In addition, trade benefits available to Haiti under the HOPE II 1 See Appendix A for information on the composition of the commission. 2 Appendix B lists Haiti‘s apparel manufacturers. 2 BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY agreement were compared with those available under the Caribbean Basin trade preference program, and with those available to Haiti‘s competitors under the Dominican Republic (DR)- Central American Free Trade Agreement. Findings presented here aim to enrich understanding of the industry in light of several strategic discussions being held in Haiti today (Perito 2009). Haiti‘s National Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, prepared in 2007 and updated in 2009, is being implemented with broad support from the donor community, including the United Nations, multilateral development banks, and bilateral donor organizations (Republic of Haiti 2007; Collier 2009; IADB 2009a). Special United Nations envoys to Haiti—former U.S. President Bill Clinton and his deputy Dr. Paul Farmer, co-founder of Partners in Health—have been engaged in these discussions, including discussions with Haitians residing abroad. The Haitian Diaspora Unity Congress held its second annual international conference in Miami in August 2009 to strategize overseas Haitians‘ support for their homeland. A Haitian Presidential Commission on Competitiveness has issued its ―Shared Vision for an Inclusive and Prosperous Haiti,‖ facilitated by the OTF Group. The apparel cluster is among five priority growth clusters identified in the strategy, and the Competitiveness Working Group is developing priority actions for it (CWG 2009). In the apparel sector, industry stakeholders have been developing a strategic vision for the industry‘s future in Haiti (ADIH and I-Trade 2009). That vision aims for the industry to become a global supplier of choice, not only for apparel, but for home furnishings and accessories, increasing industry value-added to $1.6 billion worth of sales, one-third of which is to come from full-package operations, and expanding employment to 200,000. Table 1-1 summarizes strategic initiatives. As discussed more fully below, the Better Work Haiti program of the International Labor Organization and International Finance Corporation (ILO/IFC) launched the TAICNAR program on July 1, 2009 to address factories‘ compliance with core labor standards. In presenting a detailed, survey-based analysis of apparel industry operations to date, this survey complements this strategic planning. Apparel Industries Worldwide Around the world, apparel companies defy the odds. Clothing items are produced for the world market in countries where the minimum wage is $1.50 per day and in countries where it is $15.00 per day, in factories clustered next to the seaport in an industrial or free trade zone and in factories that spread around an inland capital city and send their filled containers by truck on a four-hour ride to the nearest port, in countries that enjoy free or preferential trade relations into their lead markets and in countries that do not. There is no one formula for success, as many different kinds of garments, human resource and skill sets, sourcing patterns, INTRODUCTION 3 and value-chain strengths and weaknesses allow for the creation of infinite niches by various producers around the globe. Table 1-1 Summary of Strategic Initiatives in Haiti Initiative Lead Other Key Actors Strategic Role of Apparel Industry National Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Haiti Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation United Nations & Columbia University‘s Earth Institute Manufacturing not considered to be a ―growth vector,‖ though the textiles are seen as a ―highly promising area.‖ From Natural Catastrophe to Economic Security Professor Paul Collier, Oxford University Prepared for the United Nations Secretary-General With advantages of HOPE II, garments production seen as logical lynchpin of economic recovery strategy. ―From the important perspective of market access Haiti is now the world‘s safest production location for garments.‖ Shared Vision for an Inclusive and Prosperous Haiti Presidential Commission on Competitiveness OTF Group Apparel considered to be one of five priority growth clusters for Haitian economy; priority actions being defined. Apparel Industry Strategic Plan and Roadmap ADIH I-Trade Project, led by Chemonics Int‘l, supported by USAID Holistic vision; analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats; consideration of marketing, communications, and business environment priorities. Better Work Haiti ILO/IFC ADIH, CTMO- HOPE Responsible for the Technical Assistance Improvement and Compliance Needs Assessment and Remediation program. That being said, the global apparel industry is undergoing tremendous consolidation in the wake of the 2005 elimination of multilateral quotas on textiles and apparel trade. Production in far-flung places such as Saipan (part of the U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the western Pacific) and Namibia (in southwest Africa) has ground to a halt. Even production in once prospering platforms is contracting. For example, shortly after the United Nations‘ Transitional Authority in Cambodia ended in 1993, apparel sector employment was under 20,000; it grew in ten years to 250,000 workers, then peaked in 2008 at about 350,000 workers (Salinger et al. 2005; EIC 2008), before losing an estimated 50,000 jobs to the combination of global recession, competition, and industry consolidation. In Lesotho, apparel industry employment soared from under 10,000 in 1999 to over 50,000 in mid-2004, four years after the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) was implemented; however, by 2005, garment industry employment in Lesotho had fallen to 40,000 under pressure from an overvalued currency and looming changes to origin requirements under AGOA (Bennet 2006). Moreover, the global economic slowdown has reduced apparel imports into the United States by 10-20 percent, as of the first half of 2009, depending on whether one looks at volume or value statistics. Thus the challenges facing a relative ―newcomer‖ to the global apparel trade, such as Haiti, are daunting. This underscores the importance for Haiti to attract foreign direct investment, and the value-chain savvy that it brings, into its apparel industry. 4 BRINGING HOPE TO HAITI‘S APPAREL INDUSTRY The apparel industry has been an engine of growth and industrialization for developing countries around the world. It is one of the first formal sector opportunities to provide jobs and often higher incomes to its workforce, relative to their other livelihood opportunities. The attractiveness of such employment is underscored by the rural-to-urban migration that typically accompanies the emergence of an apparel industry. However, the ―easy‖ advances made by early industrializers, such as South Korea, are not as easily replicated today. Whereas the industry‘s internal logic was driven by the need to diversify sources of manufacturing in order to get around constraints imposed by textile trade quotas (i.e., before 1995), the internal logic today is driven by retailers‘ desires to offload as many risky dimensions of the business as possible to vertically integrated, globally networked, technologically savvy, and socially responsible producers. These are likely to be far fewer in number, although buyers also strive to maintain some diversification for risk management. As workers gain experience and skills the processing of relatively simple goods such as clothing, higher value-added manufacturing activities in footwear, automobile components, toys, and sporting goods typically begins to take hold. Eventually, with continued industrialization and economic growth, industrial sectors push into increasingly sophisticated manufacturing of electronics components, machinery, and the like. As manufacturing skills advance and the value-added of products produced increases, wages also rise. This can lead to displacement of an apparel industry, as alternative employment in higher paying manufacturing pulls labor away and apparel manufacturers re-establish themselves in country‘s with more abundant and less costly labor supplies. This pattern has been observed in a number of European, North African, and Asian countries. With its heavy reliance on women workers, the apparel industry has also been an engine of empowerment for uneducated and low-skilled women in many countries. Access to earned income contributes to a new independence for women workers, many of whom shed the confines of their rural traditions as they move to cities to take up assembly work (Kabeer 2000; Gammage et al. 2002). Some portion of that income may be remitted home to support families‘ investments in agriculture, children‘s and siblings‘ education, and other priorities. Industrial work, however, also may expose apparel workers to new risks, potential rights abuses, and the costs of being in the workforce for long hours each day. This in turn puts additional stress on families, as traditional means of food preparation and care of children and the elderly must be adapted to women‘s long working hours. Yet women‘s employment in garment factories may be steadier, with a more reliable income stream, than the terms of employment faced by their male counterparts. Uneducated, low-skilled men are likely to be employed in informal sector jobs (e.g., construction, transportation, fishing) that offer few labor protections and even more variable income streams. In cases where women workers are married, this can introduce new pressures on traditional gender roles within the family. As is discussed in Section 3 below, Haiti‘s apparel industry—like the economy overall—has had a turbulent history. Increasing factory jobs in the apparel industry, coupled with independent [... middle sections omitted for long document ...] Appendix E. Sources Consulted American Center for International Labor Solidarity. 2003. Unequal Equation: The Labor Code and Worker Rights in Haiti. Washington, DC. July. Armbruster-Sandoval, Ralph. 2003. Globalization and Transnational Labor Organizing: The Honduran Maquiladora Industry and the Kimi Campaign. Social Science History 27:4 (Winter): 551-76. Association Des Industries d’Haïti and I-Trade Project. 2009. Taking Advantage of HOPE II: A Strategic Plan and Roadmap by the Haitian AHFA™ Industry. Unpublished. Port-au- Prince. Birnbaum, David. 2009. Analysis: The new garment supplier—where, who, what. Parts I (12 May), II (26 May), and III (7 July). www.just-style.com. Blakeley, Michael. 2008. Apparel Exports to the United States: A Comparison of Morocco, Jordan, and Egypt. Prepared for U.S. Agency for International Development, Morocco mission. Arlington, VA: Nathan Associates Inc., October. Brooks, Ethel C. 2007. Unraveling the Garment Industry: Transnational organizing and women’s work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Collier, Paul. 2009. Haiti: From Natural Catastrophe to Economic Security. Prepared for the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Oxford University, January. Mimeo. Commission Tripartite de Mise en Oeuvre de la Loi HOPE. 2009. « Rapport de la Mission du Brésil. » Unpublished. Port-au-Prince. Compa, Lance A. and Stephen F. Diamond, eds. 1996. Human Rights, Labor Rights, and International Trade. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Competitiveness Working Group. 2009. Shared Vision for an Inclusive and Prosperous Haiti: Draft Report. Prepared by Presidential Commission on Competitiveness with facilitation of the OTF Group. Correia, Maria. 2002. A Review of Gender Issues in the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Jamaica. Report No. 21866-LAC. Washington, DC: World Bank. E-2 APPENDIX E Deese, William, Heidi Colby-Oizumi, William Powers, and Laura Rodriguez. 2008. Textiles and Apparel: Effects of Special Rules for Haiti on Trade Markets and Industries. Investigation No. TR- 5003-1. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, June. Diamond, Jared. 2005. One Island, Two Peoples, Two Histories: The Dominican Republic and Haiti. Chapter 11 in Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Penguin Books. Feeney, Don and Peter Minor. 2007. Factory-Level Value Chain Analysis of Cambodia‘s Apparel Industry. Prepared for U.S. Agency for International Development, Cambodia Mission, with support from the Garment Industry Productivity Center and the Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia. Arlington, VA: Nathan Associates, September. Flintoff, Corey. 2009. In Haiti, A Low-Wage Job Is Better Than None. Port-au-Prince: United Nations Development Program. 18 June. Foreign Investment Advisory Service and Business for Social Responsibility. 2008. Competitiveness and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Jordanian Apparel Industry. January. François, Lhermite. 2009. Impact Eventuel du Nouveau Salaire Minimum sur l‘Avenir de l‘Industrie de la Sous-Traitance en Haïti. Port-au-Prince : Strategic Management Group, May. Gammage, Sarah, Helene Jorgensen, Eugenia McGill, and Marceline White. 2002. Trade Impact Review. Washington, DC: Women‘s Edge Coalition, Global Trade Program. Gardella, Alexis. 2006. Gender Assessment for USAID/Haiti Country Strategy Statement. Arlington, VA: DevTech Systems. Gelb, Bernard A. 2007. Haitian Textile Industry: Impact of Proposed Trade Assistance. CRS Report for Congress, RS21839. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, January 19. Government of Haiti. 2003. Trade Policy Review, Haiti: Report by the Government. Geneva: World Trade Organization. Hornbeck, J. F. 2008. The Haitian Economy and the HOPE Act. CRS Report for Congress, RL34687. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, October. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott, Lee L. Remick, Diana E. Clark, and Rosa M. Moreira. 1993. North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics. Inter-American Development Bank. 2009a. Haiti: a new paradigm. ______. 2009b. Development of the Industrial Park Model to Improve Trade Opportunities for Haiti. HA-T1074. 12 August. APPENDIX E E-3 International Finance Corporation. 2009. Doing Business 2010: Haiti. Washington, DC. Available from www.doingbusiness.org. International Trade Union Confederation. 2009. Haiti. In Annual Survey of Violations of Trade Union Rights. Available from www.ituc-csi.org. Jaramillo, Laura and Cemile Sancak. 2007. Growth in the Dominican Republic and Haiti: Why has the Grass Been Greener on One Side of Hispaniola? IMF Working Paper WP/07/63. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Kabeer, Naila. 2000. The Power to Choose: Bangladeshi Women and Labour Market Decisions in London and Dhaka. London: Verso Books. Kenyon, Paul. 2000. Gap and Nike: No Sweat? BBC news report, October 15. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk. Kernaghan, Charles. 1996. Children Exploited by Kathie Lee/Wal-Mart. Testimony before Democratic Policy Committee, U.S. Congress. April 29. Available from www.nlcnet.org. ______. 2006. U.S. Jordan Free Trade Agreement Descends Into Human Trafficking: Tens of Thousands of Guest Workers Held in Involuntary Servitude. New York: National Labor Committee. Lerner, Michael, Lynn Salinger, and Jeffrey Wheeler. 2008. The Role of Labor Sector Issues in the Foreign Assistance Framework: Cambodia Labor Assessment. Prepared for USAID/DCHA. Burlington, VT: Associates in Rural Development. Makin, Jennifer. 2007. Cambodia: Women and Work in the Garment Industry. Phnom Penh: ILO Better Factories Cambodia and World Bank‘s Justice for the Poor Program. Minor, Peter, Jane O‘Dell, and Pooja Pokhrel. 2009. Post-Quota Textiles and Apparel Trade in Developing Countries. Prepared for U.S. Agency for International Development, Bureau of Economic Growth, Agriculture, and Trade. Arlington, VA: Nathan Associates Inc., May. Nathan Associates Inc. 2004. Dominican Republic Textile and Apparel Export Competitiveness : Trade and Industry Report. Prepared for USAID under the TCB Project. Arlington, VA, November. Perito, Robert. 2009. Haiti: Is Economic Security Possible if Diplomats and Donors Do Their Part? USIPeace Briefing. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, May. Polaski, Sandra. 2006. Combining Global and Local Forces: The Case of Labor Rights in Cambodia. World Development, 34, 5: 919-932. Priest, Matt, Maria Dybczak, and Laurie Mease. 2008. Introduction to Haiti HOPE II‘s Earned Import Allowance Program. Presentation. Washington, DC : Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration. Republic of Haiti. 1984. Décret du 24 février 1984 actualisant le Code du travail du 12 septembre 1961. Available from ILO‘s NATLEX database. Geneva: ILO. E-4 APPENDIX E ______. 2002. Loi portant sur le Code des Investissements Modifiant le Décret du 30 Octobre 1989 Relatif au Code des Investissements. Le Moniteur, Numéro Spécial, no. 4. Port-au- Prince, 26 November. ______, Institut Haitien de Statistique et d‘Informatique. 2003. Enquête sur les Conditions de Vie en Haïti 2001. Volumes I and II. Port-au-Prince, July. ______, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Direction des Zones Franches. The Engine for Job Creation. Port-au-Prince. ______, Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation. 2007. National Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (Document de Strategie Nationale pour la Croissance et pour la Réduction de la Pauvrété, DSNCRP) : Making a Qualitative Leap Forward. November. Available in English from www.imf.org and in French from www.ht.undp.org. Salinger, Lynn, Sok Hach, Chea Samnang, Neou Seiha, Mauro Pereira, Heinz Reich, and Jan Urlings. 2005. Measuring Competitiveness and Labor Productivity in Cambodia’s Garment Industry. Prepared for USAID/Cambodia. Arlington, VA: Nathan Associates Inc. SOFHIDES. 2009. La composante ‗textile‘ du secteur de la sous-traitance en Haiti. Unpublished presentation. Prepared for the I-Trade Project, Chemonics International. State Department, U.S. 2009. Investment Climate Statement—Haiti. Available from www.state.gov. Taft-Morales, Maureen. 2009. Haiti: Current Conditions and Congressional Concerns. CRS R40507. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, June 17. U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 2009. QBT-09-111: Elimination of the Paper Requirement for the Haiti HOPE Electronic Visa (ELVIS) Program. September 30. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Textiles and Apparel. 2009. Trade Data: U.S. Imports and Exports of Textiles and Apparel. Available from www.otexa.ita.doc.gov. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. 2009. 2008 Human Rights Report: Haiti. Washington, DC, February 25. Available from http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/. U.S. International Trade Commission. 2008. Textiles and Apparel: Effects of Special Rules for Haiti on Trade Markets and Industries. Investigation No. TR-5003-1, USITC Publication 4016. Washington, DC, June. Verhoogen, Eric and Charles Kernaghan. 1996. The U.S. in Haiti: How to Get Rich on 11 Cents an Hour. National Labor Committee, http://www.nlcnet.org/article.php?id=202. Verner, Dorte. 2008a. Making Poor Haitians Count: Poverty in Rural and Urban Haiti Based on the First Household Survey for Haiti. Policy Research Working Paper 4571. Washington, DC: World Bank, March. APPENDIX E E-5 ______. 2008b. Labor Markets in Rural and Urban Haiti: Based on the First Household Survey for Haiti. Policy Research Working Paper 4574. Washington, DC: World Bank. Wheeler, Jeffrey S. and B. Lynn Salinger. 2009. The Role of the Labor Sector in the Foreign Assistance Framework: Technical Paper. Prepared for USAID, Bureau of Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Affairs, Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID Bureau of Economic Growth, Agriculture, and Trade, and U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Updated, May. World Bank. 2006a. Haiti: Options and Opportunities for Inclusive Growth, Country Economic Memorandum. Washington, DC, June. ______. 2006b. Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Grant in the Amount of SDR 4.1 Million to the Republic of Haiti for an Electricity Loss Reduction Project. Report No. 36364- HT. Washington, DC, June. ______. 2009. Country Assistance Strategy for the Republic of Haiti for the Period FY09-FY12. Report No. 48284-HT. Washington, DC, May 4.