Situation de déplacement en Haïti, Round 14 (août 2026)

Haiti — Displacement Situation Round 14 | August 2026 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the publication do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. This publication was made possible thanks to the financial support of the US Department of State. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the US Department of State. Publisher: International Organization for Migration Rue E. Pierre, 11 (Zone Ambassade des États-Unis) Tabarre 27 Port-au-Prince, Haïti Email: dtmhaiti@iom.int Website: dtm.iom.int/haiti This publication was issued without formal editing by IOM. This publication was issued without IOM Publications Unit (PUB) approval for adherence to IOM’s brand and style standards. This publication was issued without IOM Research Unit (RES) endorsement Cover photo: Group psychosocial support session with newly displaced persons living in a spontaneous site © IOM Haiti, August 2026 Required citation: International Organization for Migration (IOM), August 2026, Displacement situation in Haiti as of August 2026 – Round 14. IOM Haiti. Data collection was jointly carried out with : These activities were implemented with the support of: 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 4 ANALYSES ABOUT INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS DISAGGREGATION BY AGE AND SEX 8 HOST LOCATIONS FOR INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS 9 DISPLACEMENT TRENDS 10 ORIGINS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS 12 FOCUS ON THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF PORT-AU-PRINCE 13 FOCUS ON THE COMMUNES OF THE WEST (OUTSIDE THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF PORT-AU-PRINCE ) 15 FOCUS ON THE FOUR DEPARTMENTS OF THE GREAT SOUTH 16 FOCUS ON THE ARTIBONITE DEPARTMENT 17 FOCUS ON THE CENTRE DEPARTMENT 18 FOCUS ON THE THREE DEPARTMENTS OF THE GREAT SOUTH 19 ANALYSES ABOUT RETURNEES (FORMER INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS) RETURN AREAS OF RETURNEES 21 FOCUS ON THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF PORT-AU-PRINCE 22 FOCUS ON THE CENTRE DEPARTMENT 23 PRIORITY NEEDS 24 ANNEX: METHODOLOGY 26 SUMMARY 4 1,494,456 internally displaced persons (IDPs) (13% of the Haitian population1) 351,185 displaced households +2% Increase in the number of IDPs compared to Round 13 (May 2026) 85% of IDPs are in host families/out of sites 236 15% are in sites 102 sites in the capital, hosting 204,750 IDPs (-4% compared to Round 13) spontaneous sites (26 less compared to Round 13) 134 sites in provinces, hosting 15,498 IDPs (-19% compared to Round 13) 79% of IDPs are hosted in provinces2. 42% of IDPs are hosted in only 10 communes : 1. 2. 21% of IDPs are hosted in the capital. Port-au-Prince (in the department of the West, with 9% of IDPs in the country); Delmas (West, 6%); Jacmel (South-East, 5%); Verrettes (Artibonite, 4%); Cap-Haïtien (North, 3%); Léogâne (West, 3%); Les Cayes (South, 3%); Aquin (South, 3%); Cité Soleil (West, 3%); Belladère (Centre, 3%). 171,203 Returned persons 37,380 Returned households Increase in the number of returnees compared to +3% Round 13 (May 2026)

▪ Between Rounds 13 and 14, the number of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) increased by 2 per cent, from 1.47 million to 1.49 million people. While this increase was relatively limited at the national level, it masked significant regional disparities. Artibonite recorded the largest increase (+16%), reflecting the continued deterioration of the security situation in the department and new displacement triggered by armed violence. ▪ Despite a 10 per cent decrease in the number of spontaneous sites (from 262 to 236), notably linked to the closure of six sites hosting more than 21,000 IDPs in the Metropolitan Area of Port-au-Prince (MAPAP), the total number of IDPs in the capital continued to increase (+1%). Violence in Cité Soleil triggered new displacement to other sites within the capital as well as to the departments of the Great South region. ▪ The number of returnees increased by three per cent between Rounds 13 and 14, reaching 171,203 individuals. This increase was primarily driven by returns observed in the MAPAP (+70%) and in the Centre department (+29%), which together host more than four fifths of all returnees recorded nationwide. ▪ However, these returns remain largely precarious. In the MAPAP, returnees emphasized that the sustainability of their return depends on improved security conditions, the rehabilitation of housing and community infrastructure, and access to livelihood opportunities. In the Centre department, an increasing share of returns has been observed to communes where the security situation remains fragile (Mirebalais and Saut-d’Eau). Several households reported choosing to return despite persistent risks, citing the difficult economic conditions and lack of livelihood opportunities in their areas of displacement. This percentage is calculated based on the latest population estimate produced by the Haitian Institute of Statistics and Informatics (IHSI), which places Haiti’s population at 11,867,032 inhabitants. The term "provinces" refers to all areas of the country outside the Metropolitan Area of Port-au-Prince (MAPAP), the capital. The MAPAP consists of the communes of Port-au-Prince, Delmas, Cité Soleil, Pétion-Ville, Carrefour, Tabarre, and Croix-des-Bouquets Internally Displaced Persons 5 Table 1. Number and proportion of IDPs by host area Map 1. Number of IDPs per department Host regions # of displaced households # of IDPs % of IDPs MAPAP Outside MAPAP South South-East Great South(39%) Grande'Anse Nippes 84,699 23,596 45,530 39,576 30,496 18,506 313,270 112,084 200,386 178,807 132,588 73,914 21% 8% 13% 12% 9% 5% Artibonite (12%) 38,848 183,654 12% Centre (10%) 34,136 26,209 4,447 5,142 351,185 144,541 115,050 19,402 20,760 1,494,456 10% 8% 1% 1% 100% West (29%) North Great North (10%) North-West North-East TOTAL Table 2. IDPs outside sites / with host families vs. in sites, by host area Host regions # of IDPs % of IDPs out of sites % of IDPs in sites # of sites MAPAP Outside MAPAP South South-East Great South Grande'Anse Nippes Artibonite (11%) 313,270 112,084 200,386 178,807 132,588 73,914 183,654 35% 97% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 65% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 102 11 0 0 0 0 61 Centre (10%) 144,541 96% 99.7% 100% 99% 85% 4% 0.3% 0% 1% 15% 57 West This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Great North North North-West North-East TOTAL 115,050 19,402 20,760 1,494,456 4 0 1 236 4 Returnees – formerly internally displaced Map 2. Number of returnees formerly IDPs, by department 6 Table 3. Number and proportion of returnees (former IDPs) by return area # of returned households # of returned individuals % of returned individuals MAPAP 19,952 86,591 51% Outside MAPAP 4,692 22,252 13% South 0 0 0% South-East 0 0 0% Grande'Anse 0 0 0% Nippes 0 0 0% Artibonite (4%) 1,446 6,955 4% Centre (31%) 10,790 53,100 31% 0 0 0%

Great North (1%) North – West 500 2,305 1% North - East 0 0 0% TOTAL 37,380 171,203 100% Areas of return West (64%) Great South (0%) North This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM ANALYSES ABOUT INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS Distribution of Non-Food Items to internally displaced persons in the capital © IOM Haiti, November 2024 Disaggregation by age and sex of internally displaced persons 8 Graph 2. Disaggregation by age and sex of IDPs residing in sites Graph 1. Disaggregation by age and sex of IDPs 60+ 60+ 4% 18 - 59 18% 11% 6 - 11 9% <1 18 - 59 22% 12 - 17 1-5 4% Female (55%) 6 - 11 7% 5% 32% 26% 12 - 17 9% 6% 4% 4% Female (54%) Male (46%) 4% 3% <1 1% 1% Graph 3. Disaggregation by age and sex of IDPs residing outside sites* 60+ The demographic composition of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) remains the same compared to previous assessments: more than half (55%) are women (adults and minors), and children represent 52 per cent of all IDPs. Furthermore, a persistent difference between IDPs living in sites and those residing outside sites continues to be observed: in sites, adults are the majority (66% versus 34% children), while outside sites, children constitute the majority of IDPs (55% versus 45% adults). This disparity is mainly explained by the severity of living conditions in sites, which leads many displaced persons to entrust their children to relatives, often sending them from the capital to the provinces. 7% 5% 5% 1-5 Male (45%) 3% 2% 8% 4% 18 - 59 20% 12 - 17 6 - 11 1-5 <1 4% 16% 11% Female (55%) 10% 9% 8% 6% 5% 3% 3% * Due to rounding, percentages may not add up to 100 per cent Male (45%) Host locations for internally displaced persons 9 As in Round 13, nearly half of all IDPs (42%) were concentrated in just ten of the country’s 140 communes, highlighting the strong concentration of displacement in a limited number of host areas (see Table 4 and Map 4). Although the list of the ten main host communes has remained largely unchanged over the past several rounds, the commune of Cité Soleil moved from 15th position in Round 13 to 9th during this round. This reflects the impact of armed violence that affected this commune in May and June 2026, forcing thousands of people to flee their places of residence3. As in previous assessments, the majority of IDPs continue to be hosted in provinces, which host 79 per cent of all IDPs, compared to 21 per cent within MAPAP, the capital. Outside MAPAP, almost all IDPs (99%) live outside displacement sites, primarily with host families or in rented accommodation. By contrast, within MAPAP, nearly two thirds of IDPs (65%) reside in spontaneous displacement sites. Furthermore, of the 236 spontaneous sites identified across the country, 102 (43%) are located in MAPAP and 134 (57%) outside MAPAP. However, despite being fewer in number, the sites located in the capital host the vast majority of IDPs living in sites. The 102 sites in MAPAP host 204,750 people, compared to only 15,498 people across the 134 sites located outside MAPAP. This difference is explained by the substantially higher population density of sites in the capital, which host an average of 2,007 IDPs per site, compared to 116 outside MAPAP. Table 4. Top 10 host communes for IDPs Commune Department # of IDPs Map 3. IDPs by department and presence of spontaneous sites Map 4. IDPs by commune and presence of spontaneous sites % of IDPs in the country Port-au-Prince West 140,893 9% Delmas West 83,987 6% Jacmel South-East 75,751 5% Verrettes Artibonite 63,304 4% Cap-Haïtien North 50,932 3% Léogâne West 49,637 3% Les Cayes South 45,435 3% Aquin South 45,329 3% Cité Soleil West 41,041 3% Belladère Centre 39,072

3% These maps are for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on these maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM 3. For more information, please refer to the following Emergency Tracking reports #93.2and #97 Displacement trends 10 Between Round 13 (May 2026) and Round 14 (August 2026), the total number of IDPs increased slightly by two per cent. However, this moderate increase at the national level masks significant regional disparities. The Artibonite department recorded the largest increase (+16%), rising from 158,358 IDPs in Round 13 to 183,654 in Round 14. This increase reflects the continued deterioration of the security situation in the department, where several armed violence incidents triggered the displacement of thousands of people between May and August 20264. The most significant increases were observed in the communes of Petite-Rivière de l’Artibonite (+104%), Gonaïves (+73%), Saint-Michel de l’Attalaye (+57%), L’Estère (+42%) and Dessalines (+39%) – see page 17 for further details. At the same time, the number of spontaneous sites identified across the country decreased from 262 in Round 13 to 236 in Round 14, representing a 10 per cent reduction. This decline is notably linked to an initiative undertaken by authorities to close a number of sites within MAPAP. As part of this initiative, six sites hosting more than 21,000 IDPs were closed between June and July 2026. However, this reduction in the number of sites did not result in a proportional decrease in the number of displaced persons living in sites in the capital. Indeed, despite the closure of six sites that had accommodated more than 21,000 IDPs, the population residing in sites within MAPAP declined only from 213,168 persons in Round 13 to 204,750 in Round 14, a decrease of just 4 per cent (-8,418 IDPs). This trend is largely explained by significant violences that occurred in Cité Soleil between the two rounds, which triggered new displacements towards other sites in the capital5, thereby offsetting part of the effect of the site closures. These incidents also contributed to a slight increase in the total number of IDPs within MAPAP (+1%), while generating additional population movements towards departments of the Great South, where IDP figures increased between the two rounds. Table 4. Change in the number of IDPs between Rounds 13 and 14, by host area Host regions # of IDPs in Round 13 # of IDPs in Round 14 Great South # of sites in Round 14 North North-West North-East 313,270 112,084 200,386 178,807 132,588 73,914 183,654 144,541 115,050 19,402 20,760 +1% -13% +3% +2% +8% +2% +16% -2% -2% -7% +3% 112 14 0 0 0 0 65 66 4 0 1 102 11 0 0 0 0 61 57 4 0 1 TOTAL 1,466,862 1,494,456 +2% 262 236 Artibonite Centre Great North # of sites in Round 13 309,716 129,053 193,965 175,231 123,080 72,753 158,358 146,739 117,032 20,862 20,073 MAPAP Outside MAPAP South South-East Grande'Anse Nippes West % of variation 4. For more information, please refer to the following Emergency Tracking reports #94, #95, #98, #101.2, #102 and #103 5. For more information, please refer to the following Emergency Tracking reports #93.2 and #97 11 Graph 4. Evolution of the displacement situation between 2022 and August 2026 863% increase in the number of IDPs in nearly three years (comparison of the situation between the end of 2022 and August 2026) 3% increase in the number of IDPs between end 2025 and August 2026 39% increase in the number of IDPs in 2025 232% increase in the number of IDPs during the year 2024 (comparison of the situation between the end of 2023 and the end of 2024) 1,412,199 1,450,254 1,494,456 1,466,862 1,287,593 102% increase in the number of IDPs during the year 2023 (comparison of the situation between the end of 2022 and the end of 2023) 1,041,229 702,973 578,074 313,901 194,624 155,166 113,582 362,551 127,977 Round 1 (September 2022) Round 2 (November 2022) 2022

Round 3 (March Round 4 (June 2023)Round 5 (December Round 6 (March Round 7 (June 2024) Round 8 Round 9 (December 2023) 2023) 2024) (September 2024) 2024) 2023 2024 Round 10 (June 2025) Round 11 (September 2025) 2025 Round 12 (December 2025) Round 13 (May 2026) Round 14 (August 2026) 2026 Origins of internally displaced persons Graph 6. Departments of origin (left) and host departments (right) of IDPs Map 5. Number of IDPs per communes of origin This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM Graph 5. communes of origin of IDPs 1% Artibonite (13%) <1% <1% Marigot 1% Other 1% Mirebalais 13% 3% Other 7% L'Estère Croix-Des-Bouquets 3% Saint-Marc Carrefour 2% Dessalines Cité Soleil West (74%) 2% Petite Rivière de l'Artibonite 5% Other 7% Arcahaie 7% Kenscoff 7% Delmas 18% Gressier Port-au-Prince 23% Centre (13%) SouthEast (<1%) 12 Nearly three quarters of all IDPs (74%) fled locations in the West department, particularly the MAPAP, which alone accounts for 51 per cent of all places of origin reported by IDPs. Armed violence in the Centre and Artibonite departments has also made these areas significant sources of displacement. For the first time since the start of displacement tracking rounds in September 2022, following the armed violence that occurred in the commune of Marigot in April 20266, the South-East department appears among the areas of origin of IDPs, although it represents only a limited share of the displaced population. Displacement patterns vary across areas of origin. IDPs fleeing the West department, and especially the MAPAP, primarily moved to other communes within the West department as well as to departments in the Greater South. In contrast, people displaced from the Centre and Artibonite departments largely remained within their department of origin or moved towards the departments of Great North. Information on IDPs’ places of origin is collected through key informants in each hosting location. Key informants identify the commune of origin of the majority of IDPs residing in their locality. The statistics presented here should therefore be interpreted as an indication of the main displacement trends and patterns observed, rather than as a precise estimate of the number of people who fled each commune. A more detailed analysis of places of origin, displacement trajectories and movement patterns is conducted through DTM annual household surveys, the results of which for 2026 will be published at a later stage. 6. For more information, please refer to the following Emergency Tracking report #89.1 Focus on the Metropolitan Area of Port-au-Prince 313,270 84,699 internally displaced persons displaced households Carte 6. Displacement situation in the neighborhoods of the MAPAP 13 35% increase in the number of IDPs, +1% compared to Round 13 of IDPs are in host families/out of sites % of IDPs % of variation in the compared to MAPAP Round 13 Commune # of IDPs Port-au-Prince 140,893 45% -12% Delmas 83,987 27% +1% Cité Soleil 41,041 13% +88% Pétion-Ville 28,871 9% +18% Carrefour 10,193 3% +0.3% Tabarre Croix-DesBouquets TOTAL 5,467 2% -27% 2,818 1% +10% 313,270 100% +1% Neighborhood Commune Bois Verna Port-au-Prince Sarthe Cité Soleil Delmas 2 - Saint-Martin Port-au-Prince - Tokyo Cite Louverture Port-au-Prince Bolosse Port-au-Prince Kernizan - Defilee Delmas Charlemagne Peralte Martissant - Breard Port-au-Prince Sainte-Bernadette Siloe Delmas Cite Plus Port-au-Prince Kernizan Delmas Graph 7. Evolution of the number of IDPs in the MAPAP from 2022 to August 2026 R1 (Aug 2022) 33,830 13,756 % of IDPs in the MAPAP 11% 4% 12,550 4% 11,216 8,267 4% 3% 7,831 2% 7,751 2% 6,883 6,440 6,248 2% 2% 2% 309,716 293,410 291,717 R11 (Sept 2025) R12 (Dec 2025) 313,270 184,789 173,156 127,977

87,985 This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. 139,853 160,550 (-10 sites compared to Round 13) # of IDPs 296,936 261,448 130,884 spontaneous sites in sites Table 6. Top 10 host neighborhoods for IDPs in the MAPAP Table 5. IDPs by host commune in the MAPAP 155,166 102 65% R2 (Nov 2025) R3 (March 2023) R4 (Jun 2023) R5 (Nov 2023) R6 (March 2024) R7 (Jun 2024) R8 (Sept 2024) R9 (Dec 2024) R10 (Jun 2025) R13 (May R14 (August 2026) 2026) The number of IDPs in the MAPAP increased by one per cent between Rounds 13 and 14, despite a reduction in the number of sites, which decreased from 112 to 102 following an initiative by authorities to close several sites across the capital. Despite these closures, the overall number of IDPs in the MAPAP continued to rise slightly, primarily due to the armed violence that occurred in the commune of Cité Soleil. Unlike previous rounds, IDPs residing in the commune of Port-au-Prince account for less than half of the capital’s displaced population (45%) for the first time. This change is largely explained by a 12 per cent decrease in the number of IDPs in the commune compared to Round 13, following the closure of several sites under the government-led site closure initiative. A significant proportion of households who were in these sites returned to their areas of origin, although often under precarious return conditions (see the section on returnees from page 20 onwards). At the same time, the number of IDPs in the commune of Cité Soleil nearly doubled between the two rounds (+88%), reflecting the impact of the armed violence that took place there between May and June 2026. It is also important to highlight that, unlike in the rest of the country, IDPs in the MAPAP continue to live predominantly in spontaneous sites (65%, or 204,750 individuals), making the capital the only area of the country where this type of accommodation remains the dominant living arrangement. Finally, nearly all IDPs in the MAPAP (96%) fled from other neighbourhoods within the same metropolitan area, while four per cent originated from the neighbouring commune of Kenscoff. 14 In the MAPAP, each site hosts an average of 2,007 IDPs. The distribution of IDPs between site and non-site settings changed slightly compared to the previous round, with 65 per cent of IDPs living in spontaneous sites and 35 per cent living outside sites, compared to 69 per cent and 31 per cent, respectively, in Round 13. Among IDPs living in sites in the capital, 40 per cent reside in schools, representing 81,547 individuals across 36 schools. This figure has remained virtually unchanged since Round 13, when 80,932 IDPs were hosted in 37 schools. In an effort to reduce the impact of displacement on access to education, the Education, Shelter, and CCCM Clusters have developed guidelines aimed at balancing the accommodation and protection needs of IDPs in school facilities with the continuation of educational activities7. Map 7. Types of sites in the MAPAP Table 7. IDPs outside sites / with host families vs. in sites, by host commune in the MAPAP % of IDPs out of % of IDPs sites in sites commune # of IDPs # of sites Port-au-Prince 140,893 11% 89% 49 Delmas 83,987 59% 41% 22 Cité Soleil 41,041 17% 83% 18 Pétion-Ville 28,871 73% 27% 6 Carrefour 10,193 86% 14% 3 Tabarre Croix-DesBouquets 5,467 84% 16% 3 2,818 77% 23% 1 TOTAL 313,270 35% 65% 102 Table 8. IDPs by type of sites in the MAPAP Type of sites This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. 7. For more information, please consult these guidelines (only available in French) # of sites # of IDPs in sites % of IDPs in sites School 36 81,547 40% Uncovered and fenced area 18 38,711 19% Covered and fenced area 19 38,426 19% Church / Temple 21

35,334 17% Uncovered and unfenced area 6 8,830 4% Covered and unfenced area 2 1,902 1% TOTAL 102 204,750 100% Focus on communes of the West (out of the Metropolitan Area of Port-au-Prince) displaced households Map 8. Displacement situation in the communes of the West outside the MAPAP -13% Table 9. IDPs by host commune in the communes of the West outside the MAPAP % of variation Commune # of IDPs % of IDPs compared to Round 13 49,637 15,970 14,091 11,332 10,994 4,091 3,950 1,637 382 44% 14% 13% 10% 10% 4% 4% 1% 0.3% +0.4% +2% +0.4% +2% -59% -4% +10% -15% -82% Total 112,084 100% -13% spontaneous sites in sites of IDPs are in host families/out of sites Léogâne Grand-Goâve Arcahaie Petit-Goâve Cabaret Pointe à Raquette Anse à Galets Kenscoff Cornillon / Grand Bois 11 3% 97% increase in the number of IDPs, compared to Round 13 (-3 sites compared Round 13) Graph 8. Communes of origin of IDPs living in areas of West outside the MAPAP Mirebalais <1% Marigot 1% Cornillon / Grand Bois <1% Delmas <1% Kenscoff <1% Port-au-Prince 1% West (99%) internally displaced persons 23,596 South Centr -East e (1%) (<1%) 112,084 15 10% Cabaret 20% Arcahaie 67% Gressier Graph 9. Evolution of the number of IDPs in the communes of West outside the MAPAP between June 2023 and August 20268 144,152 68,411 10,127 6,168 R4 (Jun 2023) R5 (Nov 2023) This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. 30,929 R6 (March 2024) 115,935 100,020 116,221 129,053 R12 (Dec 2025) R13 (May 2026) 112,084 24,697 R7 (Jun 2024) R8 (Sept 2024) R9 (Dec 2024) R10 (Jun 2025) R11 (Sept 2025) R14 (August 2026) In the communes of the West department located outside the MAPAP, the number of IDPs decreased by 13 per cent between Rounds 13 and 14, from 129,053 to 112,084 individuals. This decline was primarily driven by the return of IDPs previously hosted in the commune of Cabaret to the Artibonite department. As a result, Cabaret recorded the largest decrease in the number of IDPs (-59%) between the two rounds. The commune of Léogâne remains the main host commune for IDPs in this part of the West department, accounting for 44 per cent of the displaced population. The vast majority of IDPs (97%) live outside sites, while 3 per cent reside in 11 sites located across the communes of Léogâne, Arcahaie, Cabaret and Kenscoff. Furthermore, nearly all IDPs hosted in the communes of the West department outside the MAPAP originate from locations within the same department (99%). The commune of Gressier remains by far the primary place of origin, accounting for 67 per cent of reported origins. It is also the second largest place of origin of IDPs nationwide, after Port-au-Prince (see page 12). 8. Before Round 4, DTM assessments were limited to the MAPAP. However, in early 2023, DTM began observing significant population movements from the capital towards other departments across the country, prompting a gradual expansion of the geographic coverage of the assessments. Starting with Round 4, conducted in June 2023, coverage was extended to the entire West department, as well as the Centre and Artibonite departments. In November 2023 (Round 5), the assessments were further expanded to the four departments of the Greater South. Finally, since Round 7, conducted in June 2024, the assessments have covered the entire national territory, including the North, North-East and North-West departments. Focus on the four departments of the Great South 585,695 internally displaced persons 134,108 displaced households +4% increase in the number of IDPs, compared to Round 13 16 100% 0 of IDPs are in host families/out of sites spontaneous site (same as in Round 13) Table 10. Top 10 host communes for IDPs in the Great South Map 9. Displacement situation in the Great South Commune Displaced Department # of IDPs households

Jacmel Sud-Est 16,996 Les Cayes Sud 12,199 Aquin Sud 8,743 Jérémie Grande'Anse 5,557 Abricots Grande'Anse 4,925 Torbeck Sud 5,736 La Vallée Sud-Est 4,512 Anse d'Hainault Grande'Anse 4,695 Saint louis du Sud Sud 3,640 Bainet Sud-Est 3,852 This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. West (99%) SouthEast (1%) Graph 10. Communes of origin of IDPs hosted in the Great South Marigot 1% Kenscoff 2% Tabarre 2% Delmas 5% Croix-Des-Bouquets 9% Cité Soleil 9% Carrefour 13% Port-au-Prince 26% Gressier 33% The number of IDPs in the Greater South increased by four per cent between Rounds 13 and 14, rising from 565,029 to 585,695 individuals. This increase was driven in part by the armed violence that occurred in the commune of Cité Soleil in the capital, which triggered new displacement both within the MAPAP and, to a lesser extent, towards the departments of the Greater South, which have traditionally been the primary destination for people fleeing the capital. As a result, the commune of Cité Soleil became the fourth largest place of origin of IDPs hosted in the Greater South, accounting for nine per cent of reported origins, compared to just one per cent in Round 13. More broadly, IDPs residing in the Greater South predominantly originate from the capital (65%), particularly from the commune of Port-au-Prince (26%). However, the commune of Gressier, located in the West department but outside the capital, remains the primary place of origin of IDPs hosted in the Greater South, accounting for 33 per cent of reported origins. In addition, for the first time, a commune from the Greater South, namely Marigot in the South-East department, appears among the places of origin of IDPs (1%), following the armed violence that occurred in the commune in April 2026. It is important to note that slightly more than half of all IDPs in the Greater South (53%) are concentrated in just ten communes out of the region’s 51 communes, highlighting a strong concentration of displaced populations in a limited number of host areas, primarily urban centres. The communes of Jacmel, Les Cayes and Aquin alone host 29 per cent of all IDPs residing in the Greater South. % of IDPs in the Great South 75,751 45,435 45,329 23,984 21,898 20,725 19,938 18,690 17,105 16,794 13% 8% 8% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% Graph 11. Evolution of the number of IDPs in the Great South between the end of 2023 and August 2026 497,768 553,023 563,049 565,029 585,695 398,016 268,452 315,200 116,422 116,422 R5 (Nov R6 (March R7 (Jun 2023) 2024) 2024) R8 (Sept R9 (Dec R10 (Jun R11 (Sept R12 (Dec R13 (May R14 2024) 2024) 2025) 2025) 2025) 2026) (August 2026) Focus on the department of Artibonite internally displaced persons displaced households Map 10. Displacement situation in Artibonite 97% in the number of IDPs, +16% increase compared to Round 13 of IDPs are in host families/out of sites 3% Graph 12. Communes of origin of IDPs hosted in Artibonite % of variation % of IDPs in compared to Artibonite Round 13 Commune # of IDPs Verrettes Gonaïves Saint-Michel de l'Attalaye Saint-Marc Dessalines Petite Rivière de l'Artibonite Gros Morne 63,304 26,428 21,369 19,805 15,735 8,896 7,915 34% 14% 12% 11% 9% 5% 4% -1% +73% +57% -7% +39% +104% -3% Anse Rouge 5,364 3% -22% Ennery L'Estère La Chapelle Terre Neuve Marmelade Grande Saline 4,513 3,249 2,404 2,091 1,477 1,104 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% +13% +42% +4% +16% +13% +6% Total 183,654 100% +16%

The Artibonite department recorded the largest increase in the number of IDPs nationwide between Rounds 13 and 14 (+16%). This increase reflects the continued deterioration of the security situation in the department and the rise in armed violence incidents that triggered new waves of displacement. The commune of Dessalines was particularly affected by this worsening security environment. As a result, it became the second largest place of origin of IDPs hosted in Artibonite (26%), whereas it ranked fourth in Round 13, accounting for only eight per cent of reported origins. Several armed violence incidents in the commune led to the displacement of thousands of people9. Significant displacement was also observed following violence in other communes across the department, notably Petite-Rivière de l’Artibonite10, L’Estère11, Gonaïves12, Saint-Marc13 and Saint-Michel de l’Attalaye14. Consequently, the largest increases in the number of IDPs were recorded in Petite-Rivière de l’Artibonite (+104%), Gonaïves (+73%), Saint-Michel de l’Attalaye (+57%) and L’Estère (+42%). As in other departments outside the capital, the vast majority of IDPs in Artibonite live outside sites (97%), primarily with host families. Only 3 per cent of IDPs (5,634 individuals) reside in 61 spontaneous sites, representing an average of 92 people per site. Carrefour <1% Delmas 1% Croix-Des-Bouquets 3% Port-au-Prince Gros Morne <1% Grande Saline 1% Verrettes 1% La Chapelle 2% L'Estère 4% 11% Dessalines 26% Petite Rivière de l'Artibonite 84,719 R4 (Juin 2023) 8% Saint-Marc Graph 13. Evolution of the number of IDPs in Artibonite between June 2023 and August 2026 22,440 (-4 sites compared to Round 13) spontaneous sites in sites Table 11. IDPs by commune in Artibonite This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. 61 West (12%) 38,848 Artibonite (88%) 183,654 17 27,430 27,430 34,952 44,566 R5 (Nov 2023) R6 (March 2024) R7 (Jun 2024) R8 (Sept 2024) R9 (Dec 2024) 43% 150,279 158,358 R12 (Dec 2025) R13 (May 2026) 183,654 121,896 92,304 R10 (Jun 2025) R11 (Sept 2025) 9. For more information, please refer to the following Emergency Tracking reports #98 and #101.2 10. Emergency reports #98, #101.2 and #106 11. Emergency reports #98 12. Emergency reports #94 13. Emergency reports #95, #102 and #104 14. Emergency reports #103 R14 (Aug 2026) Focus on the department of Centre internally displaced persons displaced households Map 11. Displacement situation in Centre -2% 96% decrease in the number of IDPs, compared to Round 13 of IDPs are in host families/out of sites Table 12. IDPs by host commune in Centre 57 4% spontaneous sites in sites Commune # of IDPs % of IDPs in Centre Belladère Hinche Boucan Carré Mirebalais Lascahobas Thomassique Thomonde Maïssade Cerca Carvajal Saut d'Eau Savanette Cerca La Source Total 39,072 26,994 24,106 13,401 11,515 9,630 6,707 4,650 3,000 2,335 2,162 969 144,541 27% 19% 17% 9% 8% 7% 4% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 100% % of variation compared to Round 13 -6% -1% -0.4% -9% +7% +7% -0.1% +1% +5% +12% -2.4% +40% -2% Graph 15. Evolution of the number of IDPs in Centre between June 2023 and August 2026 This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. 28,975 22,935 22,935 40,753 R4 (June 2023) R5 (Nov 2023) R6 (March 2024) R7 (Jun 2024) 52,045 67,608 (-9 sites compared to Round 13) Graph 14. communes of origin of IDPs hosted in Centre West (<1%) 34,136 Centre (99.6%) 144,541 18 Croix-Des-Bouquets .<1% Lascahobas <1% Saut d'Eau 2% Mirebalais 98% 199,258 162,374 147,230 146,739 144,541 R8 (Sept 2024) R9 (Dec 2024) R10 (Jun 2025) R11 (Sept 2025) R12 (Dec 2025) R13 (May 2026) R14 (Aug 2026)

The decreasing trend in the number of IDPs hosted in the Centre department continued during this round. The number of IDPs in the department decreased by 2 per cent between Rounds 13 and 14. This decline is part of a broader trend observed since the displacement peak recorded in September 2025 (Round 11), when nearly 200,000 displaced persons were present in the department. The current figure therefore represents a decrease of approximately 27 per cent compared to that peak. This trend is partly explained by the returns observed among certain displaced populations (see the section on returnees from page 20 onwards), particularly those who had fled the commune of Lascahobas and sought refuge in Belladère, and who have now largely returned to their areas of origin. This dynamic is also reflected in the places of origin data: while the commune of Lascahobas accounted for 12 per cent of the reported origins of IDPs in the Centre during Round 13, its share dropped to less than 1 per cent in Round 14. The main host communes for IDPs in the Centre remain Belladère (27%), Hinche (19%) and Boucan Carré (17%). The situation in Belladère is particularly noteworthy, as the commune serves both as a major host area for IDPs and as one of the main entry points for people forcibly returned from the Dominican Republic. More than 78,000 forced returns have been recorded there since the beginning of 202615. The coexistence of significant needs related to hosting IDPs and assisting forcibly returned individuals places immense pressure on already limited basic services and infrastructure in the commune. 15. For additional information, please consult the Forced Returns Monitoring Dashboard. Focus on the three departments of the Great North displaced households Map 12. Displacement situation in the Great North of IDPs are in host families/out of sites Table 13. Top 11 host communes for IDPs in the Great North Commune Department Displaced households # of IDPs 0.3% 5 in sites (Same as on Round 13) spontaneous sites Graph 16. Communes of origin of IDPs hosted in the Great North % of IDPs in the Great North Gros Morne 1% L'Estère 1% Desdunes 1% Artibonite (21%) internally displaced persons 99.7% decrease in the number of IDPs, -2% compared to Round 13 Cap-Haïtien North 12,733 50,932 33% Limonade North 1,810 9,060 6% Ouanaminthe North-East 1,717 7,373 5% Limbé Pilate Grande Riviere Du Nord Jean Rabel North North 1,429 1,360 7,114 6,782 5% 4% North 1,280 6,260 4% Autre 3% North-West 1,193 5,954 4% Arcahaie 3% Quartier Morin North 1,061 5,305 3% Carrefour 5% Plaisance North 1,020 5,100 3% Delmas 7% Milot North 950 4,742 3% Croix-Des-Bouquets 9% Borgne North 989 4,670 3% This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM.

As in Round 13, the decreasing trend in the number of IDPs in the Greater North continued. The number of IDPs decreased from 157,967 to 155,212 individuals between Rounds 13 and 14, representing a two per cent decline, mainly driven by return movements of IDPs to the Centre department (see the section on returnees from page 20 onwards). Nearly three quarters of all IDPs in the Greater North (73%) continue to be concentrated in a limited number of communes (11 out of the region’s 42 communes), highlighting a strong concentration of displaced populations in specific host areas. Of these eleven communes, nine are located in the North department, one in the North-East, and one in the North-West. The commune of Cap-Haïtien remains the primary host commune, accommodating 33 per cent of all IDPs in the region. Furthermore, the Greater North continues to stand out as the region with the most diverse origins of IDPs nationwide. Forty-five per cent of IDPs fled the West department (primarily the commune of Port-au-Prince), 34 per cent originated from the Centre department (mainly the commune of Mirebalais), and 21 per cent came from Artibonite (primarily the commune of Petite-Rivière de l’Artibonite). Petite Rivière de l'Artibonite Centre (34%) 35,798 18% Mirebalais West (45%) 155,212 19 34% Port-au-Prince 18% Graph 17. Evolution of the number of IDPs in the Great North between June 2024 and August 2026 166 614 137 075 157 967 155 212 144 592 93 053 84 047 22 841 R7 (Jun 2024) R8 (Sept 2024) R9 (Dec 2024) R10 (Jun R11 (Sept R12 (Dec R13 (May R14 (Aug 2025) 2025) 2025) 2026) 2026) ANALYSES ABOUT RETURNEES - FORMERLY INTERNALLY DISPLACED Visit to a damaged market in a return area for IDPs in the capital © IOM Haiti, September 2026. Return areas of returnees 171,203 returned persons 37,380 returned households Map 12. Return areas for returnees formerly IDPs 21 +3% increase in the number of returnees, compared to Round 13 Table 14. Returnees by return area 57% 43% are females (adults and minors) are children Table 15. Top 10 communes of return # of returned individuals % of returned individuals % of variation compared to Round 13 MAPAP 86,591 51% +70% West (64%) Outside MAPAP 22,252 13% -48% 0 0 0% 0% -100% - 0 0% 0 Artibonite (4%) Centre (31%) North Areas of return South South-East Great South Grande'An (0%) se Nippes Great North North – West (1%) North East TOTAL # of % of % of variation Commune Department returned returned compared to individuals individuals Round 13 Port-auPrince West 40,020 23% +37% Lascahobas Centre 40,000 23% +15% Delmas West 25,184 15% +74% -100% Cabaret West 15,071 9% -3% 0% - Pétion-Ville West 12,014 7% +487% 6,955 4% -27% 53,100 31% +29% Mirebalais Centre 11,250 7% +89% 0 0% -100% Cité Soleil West 5,732 3% +237% 2,305 1% 0% Kenscoff West 3,533 2% -2% 0 0% - Saint-Marc Artibonite 2,790 2% +5% 171,203 100% +3% Bassin Bleu North-West 2,305 1% 0% This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM.

The number of returnees (formerly internally displaced persons) increased by three per cent between Rounds 13 and 14, rising from 165,937 to 171,203 individuals. This increase was primarily driven by returns observed in the MAPAP (+70%) and the Centre department (+29%), which host the majority of returnees, accounting for 51 per cent and 31 per cent of all returnees in the country, respectively. The communes of Port-au-Prince (23% of all returnees nationwide), Lascahobas (23%) and Delmas (15%) alone account for more than 60 per cent of all returnees and all recorded significant increases between the two rounds. However, at this stage, these returns cannot be considered sustainable. Returnee households interviewed in the MAPAP identified several key conditions required to sustain their return, including an increased presence of security forces, the rehabilitation of housing and community infrastructure, and access to livelihood opportunities. Focus on the Metropolitan Area of Port-au-Prince increase in the number of 19,952 86,591 +70% returnees, compared to returned persons returned households 22 Round 13 Map 13. Neighborhoods of return of returnees in the MAPAP Table 17. Top 10 return neighborhoods in the MAPAP Table 16. Communes of return in the MAPAP Commune % of # of % of variation returned returned compared to individuals in individuals Round 13 the MAPAP Port-au-Prince 40,020 46% +37% Delmas 25,184 29% +74% Pétion-Ville 11,573 13% +466% % of returned individuals in the MAPAP Neighborhood Commune # of returned individuals Thomassin Fermathe - Fort Jacques Pétion-Ville 9,369 11% Christ-Roi Delmas 7,610 9% Croix Desprez - TiPort-au-Prince Source 5,914 7% Ti Savanne - Trantin Port-au-Prince 3,923 5% Cité Soleil 5,732 7% +237% Baillergeau Port-au-Prince 3,517 4% Croix-Des-Bouquets 1,873 2% -26% Nazon Delmas 2,403 3% Tabarre 1,292 1% +65% Delmas 30 Delmas 3,260 4% Carrefour 917 1% +684% Cite Plus Port-au-Prince 3,149 4% Total 86,591 100% Campèche Port-au-Prince 3,011 3% +70% Tapis Rouge Port-au-Prince 2,934 3% This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Nearly three quarters of all returnees in the capital are hosted in the communes of Port-au-Prince (46%) and Delmas (29%). Since the withdrawal of armed groups from several neighbourhoods located along the border between the communes of Port-au-Prince and Delmas in August 202516, gradual returns have been observed to these areas. This trend has also been reinforced by authorities’ initiative to close several displacement sites that had been hosting a significant proportion of IDPs originating from these neighborhoods. Together, these factors largely explain the continued return movements observed in the capital. However, these returns remain fragile. Returnees interviewed reported that the sustainability of their return depends, among other factors, on a sustained presence of security forces in return areas, the rehabilitation of housing and community infrastructures, and access to livelihood17. Visits conducted by IOM teams to these neighborhoods revealed extensive damage to housing, water supply infrastructure, health facilities, schools, and markets. 16. For more details, please refer to this ICG article 17. IOM, April 2026, A study on the return dynamics of internally displaced persons in the neighbourhoods of Bas Delmas and Haut Port-au-Prince, IOM Haiti. Focus on the department of Centre 53,100 returned persons 10,790 returned households +29% 23 increase in the number of returnees, compared to Round 13 Map 14. Return areas in the Centre Table 18. Communes of return in the Centre Commune # of returned individuals % of returned individuals in Centre % of variation compared to Round 13 Lascahobas 40,000 75% +15% Mirebalais 11,250 21% +89% Saut d'Eau 1,850 3% +249% Thomassique 0

0% 0% Cerca Carvajal 0 0% 0% Boucan Carré 0 0% 0% Cerca La Source 0 0% 0% Savanette 0 0% 0% Hinche 0 0% 0% Thomonde 0 0% 0% Belladère 0 0% 0% Maïssade 0 0% 0% Total 53,100 100% +29% This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. The increasing trend in returns observed in the Centre department since Round 13 continued during this round, with the number of returnees increasing by 29 per cent. This increase was primarily driven by the return of a large proportion of IDPs who had fled the commune of Lascahobas and sought refuge in Belladère. As a result, the commune of Lascahobas now hosts three quarters of all returnees in the department. Increases were also observed in the communes of Mirebalais and Sauts-d’Eau. However, unlike in Lascahobas, the security situation in these areas remains fragile, and local authorities continue to advise against returns. Despite this, some displaced households have chosen to return. Many reported to IOM teams that the difficult conditions in host areas, particularly the lack of access to livelihood opportunities, had led them to return to their areas of origin in order to resume agricultural activities, despite the ongoing protection risks and the possibility of renewed displacement. These returns often involve only part of the household. Many respondents indicated that some family members, particularly children, remained in the areas of displacement while adults returned to their places of origin. PRIORITY NEEDS Mobile phone repair training aimed at strengthening livelihood opportunities for displaced youth and host communities in the capital © IOM Haiti, September 2026. 25 Priority needs Graph 18. Priority needs reported in IDP and/or returnee host locations (% of host localities) (Multiple choice question) During this round, 1,150 localities were assessed, including 1,036 where the presence of at least one group of IDPs or returnees was identified. In these localities, key informants reported on the main needs observed. Food remains the most frequently reported need, having been identified in 80 per cent of the affected localities. It was followed by livelihoods (62%), shelter (42%), and water, sanitation and hygiene (41%). Health needs were reported in 28 per cent of localities, while education (19%), non-food items (14%), and protection (8%) were reported less frequently. 80% 62% 42% 41% 28% 19% Food Livelihood Shelter Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Health Education 14% Non-Food Items 8% Protection Data presented in this section provide an overview of the needs reported by key informants. To deepen the analysis of vulnerabilities and needs among IDPs, returnees, and host communities, the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) conducts annual household surveys to assess their multisectoral needs in greater depth18. The findings from the analyses conducted in 2026 will be published at a later stage and will contribute to further informing humanitarian response planning. 18. International Organization for Migration (IOM), February 2026, Comparative Analysis of the Multisectoral Needs of Iinternally Displaced Persons and Host Communities, IOM 26 ANNEX: METHODOLOGY Map 15. Localities assessed in the field during Round 14 1,150 4,262 assessed localities key informants interviewed (91% assessed through field interviews and 9% by phone)

Since August 2022, the Directorate General of Civil Protection (DGPC) and IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) have been conducting periodic assessments of localities hosting displaced populations. These assessments aim to provide baseline information on the scale and dynamics of displacement, as well as on the living conditions and needs of displaced populations. Their objective is to inform response strategies, whether for immediate humanitarian interventions or initiatives aimed at promoting durable solutions. Data are collected through direct observation and group interviews with key informants at the smallest geographic level mapped in the country: the neighbourhood within the MAPAP and the communal section outside the MAPAP. Spontaneous sites are also assessed where they exist. On average, four key informants are interviewed in each assessed locality. Data collection for Round 14 was conducted between 15 May and 12 August 2026 by 518 enumerators (62% male and 38% female), who carried out interviews with 4,642 key informants (68% male and 32% female) across 1,150 assessed localities, including 516 communal sections outside the MAPAP, 398 neighbourhoods within the MAPAP, and 236 spontaneous sites. Due to security constraints, interviews with key informants were conducted remotely in 9 per cent of assessed localities, while the remaining 91 per cent were carried out in person (see Map 15). Data collection was jointly conducted by IOM and DGPC teams. This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Limits: Graph 19. Profiles of key informants interviewed during Round 14 36% 19% 16% 12% 7% 4% Members of Health, education Representatives ASEC and Civil Protection Religious leaders community-based and other of IDPs or CASEC members focal points organizations professionals returnees 2% 2% 2% Other NGO staff Municipal authorities The information presented is based on estimates provided by key informants regarding their own communities and does not constitute either an exhaustive count or an individual registration exercise. To generate the most reliable estimates possible, assessments are conducted at the finest geographic level, and key informants are selected based on their indepth knowledge of the locality concerned (see Graph 19).