(2017) CRS - Haïti déclare le vainqueur de l'élection présidentielle après des retards
Resume — Haïti a déclaré Jovenel Moise vainqueur des élections présidentielles de novembre 2016 après des retards répétés. Le processus électoral a été difficile, contribuant aux tensions politiques et à l'instabilité dans le pays.
Constats Cles
- Jovenel Moise déclaré vainqueur de l'élection présidentielle de novembre 2016 après des retards.
- Processus électoral entaché d'irrégularités et de différends.
- L'absence de conseil électoral permanent a contribué aux problèmes.
- Les acteurs politiques n'ont pas utilisé les procédures juridiques établies pour résoudre les différends.
- La communauté internationale a fourni une assistance électorale et une aide humanitaire.
Description Complete
Ce rapport traite de la déclaration de Jovenel Moise comme vainqueur de l'élection présidentielle haïtienne de novembre 2016 après de nombreux retards. Le processus électoral a été semé d'embûches, notamment l'absence de conseil électoral permanent, les différends concernant les élections de 2015 et le non-respect des procédures juridiques établies pour résoudre les différends. Ces problèmes ont contribué aux tensions politiques, à l'instabilité et ont entravé la capacité du gouvernement haïtien à fonctionner efficacement. Le rapport aborde également le rôle de la communauté internationale, y compris les États-Unis, dans la fourniture d'une assistance électorale et d'une aide humanitaire.
Texte Integral du Document
Texte extrait du document original pour l'indexation.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Updated January 6, 2017
Haiti Declares Winner of Presidential Election After Delays
On January 3, 2017, Haiti’s electoral council declared
political novice Jovenel Moise the winner of its November
2016 presidential elections. Elections had been delayed
repeatedly, leaving Haiti without an elected president for
almost a year. The inauguration will probably be held on
the constitutionally mandated date of February 7.
Final results show Moise of the Bald Head Party (PHTK,
former President Michel Martelly’s party), an agricultural
exporter, won with almost 56% of the vote. Voter turnout
was 21%. Jude Célestin received about 20% of the valid
vote; Moise Jean-Charles won 11%; and Maryse Narcysse,
of former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide’s Fanmi Lavalas
party, garnered 9%. Those three candidates filed
complaints; after a formal appeals process, the provisional
electoral council (CEP) announced final results on January
3. Because Moise still has more than 50% of the vote and/or
25% more than the next candidate, no run-off vote will be
necessary. Run-off elections for some parliamentary and
local elections will be held on January 29, 2017.
Contested positions in November included the presidency,
with 27 candidates; 10 Senate seats, with 116 candidates;
and some disputed seats in both chambers from earlier
elections. One legislator is sure to cause particular concern
for the United States. Guy Philippe, a former coup leader,
was elected to the Senate for a six-year term. He is wanted
by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration for alleged
drug trafficking and money laundering. Philippe is
reportedly allied with president-elect Moise’s PHTK.
The new president will take over the poorest country in the
hemisphere, plagued by high political tensions, security
concerns, low economic growth, a cholera epidemic, and
greatly reduced foreign aid.
Prolonged Lack of Elected President
Haiti has been without an elected president since February
2016. After the Haitian government failed to complete a
cycle of elections, including a second round of presidential
voting at the end of 2015, former President Michel Martelly
ended his term without an elected successor. The legislature
named Senate President Jocelerme Privert interim
president, to ensure that second-round presidential elections
took place in April 2016 and a new president was installed
in May. Privert established a verification commission to
investigate opposition-party charges of electoral fraud; the
commission called for the first round of the presidential
election to be re-held. Some international observers
disagreed with the need to re-hold the presidential election
but acknowledged a potential political need to re-hold the
election due to public perceptions of its legitimacy.
Meanwhile, Privert’s term expired on June 14, 2016, and
the Haitian legislature has repeatedly failed to vote on
extending his mandate or appointing another provisional
president. The Obama Administration has said it will
continue to recognize Privert until another official is
named. Violent attacks against candidates, a police station,
and businesses have added to concerns over stability.
U.S. Special Coordinator for Haiti Kenneth Merten said in
October that the United States hoped Haiti would hold
credible elections so that there would be a “democratically
elected government from top to bottom to deal with ... on
things like recovering from [Hurricane Matthew], and the
recovery work that still needs to be done” after the
devastating 2010 earthquake.
The Obama Administration welcomed the holding of the
November elections and issuance of the results as important
steps toward returning Haiti to full constitutional rule.
Troubled Electoral Processes Threaten Stability
Haiti has been slowly transitioning from centuries of
authoritarian rule to a democratic government over the past
30 years. Progress has been made in developing democratic
institutions, but—as evident in the electoral delays—these
institutions remain weak. During this period, elections have
been sources of increased political tensions and instability
in the short term. Haiti’s current electoral problems are part
of a troubled process extending back for years, due to the
failures of previous governments to hold a series of
presidential and legislative elections for prolonged periods.
We congratulate President-elect Jovenel Moïse on his
first-round victory and look forward to working
closely with him as we strengthen our longstanding
partnership with Haiti. We urge all actors to accept
the final results, refrain from violence, and work
together to build a stable and prosperous Haiti.
U.S. Department of State Spokesperson, January 3, 2017
In the long term, elected governments in Haiti have
contributed to the gradual strengthening of government
capacity and transparency. Still, in the present
circumstances, the international community has expressed
concern that continual delays have hampered the Haitian
government’s ability to function, decreased the public’s
faith in public institutions, exacerbated political
polarization, and threatened stability.
A key problem has been the lack of a permanent electoral
council, which the 1987 Haitian constitution established as
the body responsible for setting dates for and organizing
new elections. There has never been a permanent council,
only provisional ones. Nine elements of the Haitian
government and civil society were supposed to propose the
council members. Delayed elections contributed to the
problem; without a full government in place, some of those
entities were not able to name their nominees, so temporary
councils were formed. The formation of each electoral
council involved political disputes, and each council was
Haiti Declares Winner of Presidential Election After Delays
https://crsreports.congress.gov
inexperienced at running elections. In 2012, constitutional
amendments went into effect that included a streamlined
process for creating a permanent electoral council. Despite
that new process, forming an electoral council continues to
be fraught with political disputes and a key reason why
organizing elections in Haiti remains difficult.
For instance, former President Martelly assumed office for
a five-year term in May 2011 and fired the CEP responsible
for organizing new legislative elections in December 2011.
He did not begin to form a new council until June 2012, six
months after elections for one-third of the Senate should
have been held under Haitian law. It became difficult for
the Senate to meet the quorum needed to conduct business,
including naming its representatives to the CEP and passing
necessary electoral laws. For the next three years, the
political process progressed in fits and starts and
contributed to heightened political tensions. In January
2015, the legislature was dissolved, as most legislators’
terms had expired without elected replacements. Martelly
began to rule by decree. The same month, the government
established a new CEP—the fifth iteration under Martelly.
Dispute over the 2015 Elections
The Haitian government finally organized elections in
2015. First-round legislative elections were held in August;
runoff legislative elections and first-round presidential
elections were held simultaneously with municipal elections
on October 25. Elections featured 54 presidential
candidates, most representing parties organized around
personalities more than platforms. The CEP declared that
Moïse, the candidate for Martelly’s party, and Célestin,
who lost to Martelly in 2011, would proceed to a runoff.
For both the August and the October elections, the United
States, the Organization of American States, the European
Union, and other international electoral observers found
that irregularities existed but were not sufficient to
invalidate the results. The relatively peaceful first-round
presidential elections were followed by sometimes violent
protests over the contest’s validity. A coalition of eight
candidates, which included Célestin, alleged fraud,
including by the government.
Disputes Voiced Outside the Legal Framework
Another key problem that stalls elections is the failure of
political actors to use established legal and constitutional
procedures to address or resolve disputes. The opposition
has resorted primarily to street protests and demands for
actions outside the constitutional framework, such as
calling for an independent commission to conduct a
recount, to address its allegations of electoral fraud. One
Haitian observer group supported by the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) expressed concern that
“a group of presidential candidates have refused to take the
path of formal dispute and preferred to ... demand
verification ... by an Independent Commission.” The group
called for certain political actors to show “political maturity
... to avoid the political chaos looming on the horizon.” U.S.
Haiti Special Coordinator Merten repeatedly urged
candidates to file complaints and evidence of fraud through
the existing legal framework. Only two candidates,
including Narcysse, did so.
The government postponed the runoff presidential elections
scheduled for December 27, 2015, just one week before
elections were to be held because of the ongoing disputes
and fears of violence. Despite pressure from the
international community, including the U.N., to transfer
power through elections within the constitutional time
frame, it became clear that Haiti would not hold elections
before the constitutional end of Martelly’s term. The
Haitian constitution (as amended in 2012) provides for
temporary executive powers to complete a president’s term
but does not address the situation in which a president
finishes his or her term but has no elected successor.
Martelly and the legislature drew on elements of the
constitution to work out an agreement under which the
legislature elected a provisional president to serve for 120
days, during which time the provisional president would
appoint a prime minister to oversee elections. As mentioned
above, Privert was elected provisional president.
Following the release of the verification commission’s
report, the CEP canceled a runoff in April 2016 and
scheduled new presidential elections and some legislative
contests for October 9, 2016 instead. That vote was delayed
when Hurricane Matthew devastated parts of Haiti on
October 3-4. The worst hurricane in a decade left 1.4
million people in need of immediate assistance, according
to the United Nations (U.N.). The United States and other
donors have responded with aid.
U.S. Elections and Other Assistance
The United States contributed $33 million for the electoral
cycle that began in 2015, assuming three rounds of
elections—a legislative first round, simultaneous legislative
second round and presidential first round, and presidential
final round. Rejecting the CEP’s decision to re-hold the
2015 presidential election, the State Department suspended
U.S. electoral assistance in July 2015. After Hurricane
Matthew, however, the U.S. Embassy provided aid to help
rehabilitate voting centers and roads damaged by the storm
to facilitate voting. USAID has provided $48 million in
additional humanitarian assistance since the storm hit.
Much of this aid will focus on preventing the spread of
cholera. The Department of Homeland Security temporarily
suspended deportations of certain Haitians on a limited
basis following the hurricane but resumed the deportations
in early November. The Administration’s FY2017 request
for aid to Haiti totals $218 million, a $25 million decrease
from actual FY2015 assistance to the country.
The 114
th
Congress expressed concern over stalled elections
in the FY2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 114-
113), which required the State Department to withhold all
assistance for the “central government of Haiti” until the
Secretary of State certifies that the Haitian government was
“taking effective steps” to hold free and fair parliamentary
elections, and other steps. The State Department has stated,
however, that it does not provide any direct assistance to
the Haitian government.
Maureen Taft-Morales, Specialist in Latin American
Affairs
IF10440
Haiti Declares Winner of Presidential Election After Delays
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10440 · VERSION 8 · UPDATED
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.