Limits in the Seas nimewo 51: liy debaz dwat, Ayiti
Rezime — Etid sou fwontyè entènasyonal, seri A, Limits in the Seas nimewo 51, Jeograf Biwo Entèlijans ak Rechèch Depatman Deta Etazini pibliye 25 me 1973. Li analize, moso pa moso, limit lanmè teritoryal dekrè ayisyen 6 avril 1972 la fikse, epi li repwodui dekrè a tradui an angle.
Dekouve Enpotan
- Dekrè 6 avril 1972 la fikse lanmè teritoryal Ayiti a 12 mil maren apati liy mare ba, sa double limit 6 mil Ayiti te rekonèt depi 1894, epi li ajoute yon zòn kontigi 3 mil pou lapèch.
- Limit deyò ki gen fòm poligòn sou ti kat dekrè a pa koresponn ak liy mare ba, kidonk li sipoze yon sistèm liy debaz dwat dekrè a pa janm di.
- Liy debaz ki fèmen Gòlf Lagonav la mezire apeprè 89 mil maren, plis pase liy 24 mil ki pèmèt pou fèmen yon bè.
- Jan yo trase l la, lajè lanmè teritoryal la varye ant mwens pase 12 ak plis pase 40 mil maren.
- Limit nò ak sid yo aji tankou fwontyè lanmè teritoryal Ayiti deklare pou kont li ak Repiblik Dominikèn, e zòn kontigi a ta monte sou lanmè teritoryal dominiken an nan plizyè kote.
Teks Konple Dokiman an
Teks ki soti nan dokiman orijinal la pou endeksasyon.
-2
STRAIGHT BASELINES: HAITI
On April 6, 1972, the Government of Haiti issued a decree altering its claimed territorial
sea and contiguous zone. (See Enclosure No. 1). Whereas no previous legislation existed
concerning the breadth of the territorial sea, Haiti had consistently acknowledged a 6 mile
limit since 1894. The new decree doubles the previous breadth to 12 nautical miles,
measured "from the low-water line" of the coast. Moreover, Haiti, in article 5, has laid claim
to an additional three-mile contiguous fisheries zone 1 Within this zone Haiti will also
exercise all control it judges necessary to assure security of navigation, prevent infractions
of its sanitary, fiscal, customs, and immigration laws, and prevent pollution and other risks
that might endanger the maritime environment.
A very small-scale map (c. 1:5,000,000) accompanied the decree. The map illustrates an
irregular polygonal outer limit for the territorial sea, using specified coordinate pairs for
turning points. The limits shown on the map have been plotted directly on the attached
chart2 When so plotted, the inner limit of the territorial sea (constructed from a similar
polygon situated 12 nautical miles landward of the outer territorial sea limits) does not
relate directly to the "low-water line" of the Haitian coast.
As a result, it would seem that the limits of the Haitian territorial sea either had to be
measured from implied straight baselines or from an unexplained but equivalent baseline
system. A request for clarification of the system used for establishing the territorial sea
limits was sent to the Government of Haiti which noted that the lines were drawn from
droites paralleles from "the points on the coast most-advanced into the sea." Of interest,
the Haitian reply also stated that the waters between the polygon A - K and the coast were
territorial waters. Had a true system of straight baselines been established, the territorial
waters would have extended from the polygon to the baseline segments; internal waters
would be situated between the segments and the low-water coastline. Consequently, the
basis for the system is not clear. If a straight baseline system has not been utilized, then
the limits of the territorial should be everywhere 12 nautical miles from the low-water
baseline of the Haitian coast as expressed in Article 1. An examination of the chart shows
that this condition does not prevail.
It is also noted that the decreed limits of the territorial sea adjacent to the Dominican
Republic in the north and the south represent, in effect, unilaterally declared territorial sea
boundaries. The contiguous zone, moreover, would overlap the Dominican territorial sea in
many places.
1
The 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, to which Haiti is a party, permits contiguous
zones only to a distance of 12 nautical miles from the baseline.
2
The small scale of the Haitian map has led to plotting difficulties. The coordinate systems of the decree map and the one
attached to this study obviously do not agree. As a result, all limits and distances discussed in this study must be deemed to be
approximate.
-3
ANALYSIS
It is assumed that a series of "straight baselines" have been drawn to form the basis of the
polygonal territorial sea limits. The following analysis implies these baseline
segments and they have been drawn on the attached chart. Positional discrepancies, as
noted, are discussed in detail below:
LINE
COMMENT
A–B
Position A plots on the U.S. oceanographic chart (NO) approximately
1.25 nautical miles northwest of the terminus of the Dominican
Republic – Haiti boundary. Line A - B passes about 0.5 nautical
miles from the Dominican Manzanillo Point and 0.9 nautical miles
from Arenas Cay in the Seven Brothers group. At this point, line A - B
is approximately 2.8 and 8.25 nautical miles, respectively, from the
nearest points on the low-water line of Haiti. The points, by definition,
would lie 12 nautical miles from the implied Haitian straight baseline.
The implied baseline, from which A – B might be measured, would
extend about 6.6 nautical miles from Caracol Point northwestward to
an imaginary and seemingly arbitrary point in the sea, 4.15 nautical
miles from the low-water line of Haiti.
B–C
The implied baseline for this segment extends approximately 43.6
nautical miles from the previously-described point to a peak on westcentral Ile de la Tortue (Tortuga Island). The segment illustrates the
problems of positioning. By the description, the northern point of
Tortuga probably is intended to be the terminal basepoint of the
straight baseline segment. However, from the inaccuracies of the
small-scale map, the position has been displaced approximately 2.4
nautical miles to the south. As described, Point C on the polygon lies
less than 10 nautical miles from the low-water line of Tortuga. The
territorial sea breadth does not attain the requisite 12 nautical miles in
this area, although it is much greater elsewhere. (Note: If the
territorial sea were indeed measured from straight baselines, the line
near the intersectional points, e.g., B, C, D, etc., would be arcs and
not angles of straight lines. The angular product is, perhaps, what is
meant by droites paralleles.) The greatest breadth of the territorial
sea, if straight baselines have not been employed, would be 17
nautical miles.
C–D
The length of the implied straight baselines would be approximately
10.5 nautical miles extending from the previously-defined point
southwestward. Point D, which most likely should be Pointe Ouest on
Tortuga, plots in the Canal de la Tortue 3.3 nautical miles south and
west of the point. The minimum breadth of the (plotted) territorial sea
-4
would be 9.5 nautical miles.
D–E
The implied baseline extends 26.25 nautical miles from the previously
defined point to a point near Cap San Nicolas, south of Cap du Mole.
Since the latter cape extends seaward of the plotted point, it is safe to
assume that Cap du Mole is the terminal point, i.e., although the
coordinates dispute it, the intent probably was to joint Pointe Ouest
with Cap du Mole. The minimum territorial sea (as plotted) measures
10.1 nautical miles; the maximum, 13.5.
E–F
This segment closes the Golfe de la Gonave, a major indentation of
the west coast (c. 95 nautical miles by 85 nautical miles). The implied
baseline measures approximately 89 nautical miles. The terminal
point (F) plots on the north shore of the southern peninsula to the east
of Cap Dame-Marie. The latter is probably the selected closing point.
The length of the implied line closing Gonave and the amount of water
contained within the line would be excessive, by normal state
practices for straight baselines. The length also exceeds the
permitted closing for a bay, i.e., 24 nautical miles. The midpoint of the
Line E - F lies approximately 40 nautical miles from the low-water line
of the Haitian coast.
F–G
From the previously described point, the implied baseline extends
12.1 nautical miles south-southwestward to a point in the sea about 2
nautical miles north of Cap Fanchon. The intended turning point could
be this cape or Cap Irois immediately to the south. The (plotted)
territorial sea measures, at a minimum, 10.6 nautical miles from the
implied baseline; the maximum, 12 nautical miles.
G–H
Extending southeastward, this segment presumably connects Cap
Fanchon (or Irois) with Pte. Aigrette, the southwestern cape of Haiti.
The plotted position, however, lies 2.70 nautical miles east-southeast
of that point. The (plotted) minimum territorial sea thus becomes
approximately 9.5 nautical miles. Point H, however, is situated
approximately 14.25 nautical miles from the Haitian low-water
baseline.
H–I
The implied straight baseline joins the previously described point to
Pt. Gravois. The plotted position, however, lies approximately 9.75
nautical miles eastward of that point. The implied straight baseline
measures 38.3 nautical miles in length. The maximum breadth of the
territorial sea claim becomes 16.5 nautical miles; the minimum, 10.0.
-5
I– J
The implied baseline extends due eastward at the same latitude as
the previously described position to a point in the open sea (17°59"N;
72°05'W.) approximately 14.2 nautical miles from the low-water
baseline. The maximum breadth of the resulting territorial sea
measures about 26 nautical miles with an average width of 20
nautical miles.
J–K
The plotted position of point "K" lies onshore about 0.9 nautical miles
from the coastal terminus of the boundary (on large-scale charts). The
implied straight baseline joins the previously described point with an
insignificant cape on the mainland. As noted above, the "contiguous"
zone would extendbeyond the territorial sea of Haiti to overlap, in part,
the claimed Dominican Republic sea. The "territorial sea boundary",
which in effect line J - K represents, is a unilaterally established limit.
SUMMARY
The basic system utilized in the establishment of the limits of the Haitian territorial sea is
obscure. While the law calls for measurement of the territorial sea from the low-water
baseline of the coast, this system has not been utilized. Furthermore, the turning points
were plotted on a very small-scale map and not from a reasonably-scaled nautical chart.
As a result, the problem of interpretation is compounded by positional difficulties. The
Haitian Government described the system as utilizing droites paralleles from the most
seaward points of the Haitian coast. The government has basically drawn a "system of
straight baselines" in a unique manner. The Convention on the Territorial Sea and the
Contiguous Zone, for example, states that a system of straight baselines may be utilized for
deeply-indented coasts or coasts fringed with islands. The Haitian coastline, in places
contains islands. These, however, have not been used as the basepoints with the
exception of Tortuga. Gonave represents an indentation of the coast but the scale of the
resulting system dwarfs the physical features upon which the system has been developed.
The breadth of the territorial sea (as plotted) measures not 12 nautical miles as decreed
but from less than 12 to more than 40 nautical miles.
ATTACHMENT
And after deliberation in the Council of Secretaries of State;
DECREES
Article 1--The limit of Haitian territorial waters is fixed at 12 nautical miles from
the low-water line.
Article 2--Waters situated on that side of the baseline of the territorial sea facing
-6
toward the land are part of the interior waters of the Republic of Haiti.
Article 3--Permanent installations which are part of the port system and which
extend into the open sea are considered part of the coast of the Republic of
Haiti.
Article 4--The State of Haiti exercises full sovereignty over the seabeds and land
under the seabeds within the limit of its territorial waters, as well as over the
airspace above such waters.
Article 5--A zone of 3 nautical miles contiguous to the territorial sea is
established over which the State of Haiti extends its exclusive jurisdiction for
purposes of fishing.
Arcticle 6--The State of Haiti will regulate fishing in the territorial sea and in the
zone contiguous to it taking into consideration the rational use and conservation
of its living resources.
Article 7--The State of Haiti exercises over the contiguous zone all control that it
judges necessary for:
a) assuring the security of navigation and preventing infractions of
its sanitary, fiscal, customs and immigration laws.
b) preventing pollution, contamination and other risks which might
endanger the ecological equilibrium of the quatic environment.
Article 8-a) The State of Haiti exercises full sovereign rights over the
continental shelf for the purposes of its exploration and the
exploitation of its natural resources.
b) The rights mentioned in paragraph (A) of this article are
exclusive: No one may explore or exploit the continental shelf
without the express written consent from the Government of Haiti.
c) The rights of the State of Haiti over the continental shelf are
independent of any actual or claimed occupation.
Article 9--The State of Haiti reserves for itself the right to build, maintain and
operate, on the continental shelf any installations and other devices necessary for
the exploration and exploitation of its natural resources, to establish zones of
security around these installations or devices, and to take within these zones
measures necessary for their protection.
-7
Article 10--[Haitian] Law will determine the terms and conditions under which the
State of Haiti will concede its rights over the continental shelf, be it to another
State or to a national or foreign company, or to any other entity (Personne
Morale").
Article 11--The limits established by the present Law are minimum limits which
may be adapted to any new tendency of Public Positive International Law.
Signed at the National Palace, Port-au-Prince, April 6, 1072, the 169 Year of
Independence.
JEAN-CLAUDE DUVALIER
Kijan pou site
United States Department of State, 1973, Limits in the Seas nimewo 51: liy debaz dwat, Ayiti, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LIS-51.pdf
- Moun oswa enstitisyon ki gen dwa yo
- United States Department of State