Premye rapò anyèl sou aplikasyon DSNCRP la (2007-2008), ak nòt konsiltatif IDA-FMI a
Deskripsyon Konple
The Government of Haiti's first annual report on implementation of the National Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy (DSNCRP) for 2007-2008, titled 'Making a Qualitative Leap Forward' and dated February 2009, published together with the IDA-IMF Joint Staff Advisory Note that reviews it. The government report covers progress against the DSNCRP's three pillars over the strategy's first year, reports on state modernisation and economic governance reforms, and carries macroeconomic indicator tables for FY2004/05 to FY2007/08 including real and nominal GDP growth, inflation and public savings. The advisory note sets out the IDA and IMF staffs' assessment of implementation and of the monitoring arrangements.
Teks Konple Dokiman an
Teks ki soti nan dokiman orijinal la pou endeksasyon.
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
AND
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
REPUBLIC OF HAITI
Joint Staff Advisory Note (JSAN)
of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (DSNCRP) Annual Progress Report
Prepared by the Staffs of the International Development Association (IDA)
and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Approved by Gilbert Terrier and Dominique Desruelle (IMF)
Pamela Cox (IDA)
June 3, 2009
I. OVERVIEW
1. This Joint Staff Advisory Note (JSAN) reviews the first Progress Report of the
Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (Rapport Annuel de la Mise en Oeuvre du Document
de Stratégie Nationale pour la Croissance et la Réduction de la Pauvreté, RA-DSNCRP)
prepared by the Government of Haiti. The DSNCRP, covering the period 2007-2011, was
approved by the Government and submitted to the International Development Association
(IDA) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on November 30, 2007. The annual
progress report was submitted to IDA and the IMF on April 23, 2009.
2. The DSNCRP was prepared through a participatory process consisting of
consultations with civil society, Government officials, and development partners. The
overall strategic priorities are structured around three pillars: (i) enhancing human
development, with a focus on improving delivery of basic services; (ii) improving
security and the justice system; and (iii) promoting vectors of growth through
agriculture and rural development, tourism, and infrastructure. The DSNCRP also
emphasizes the importance of a stable macroeconomic framework and sound
management of public resources.
3. This first Annual Progress Report (APR) of the country’s DSNCRP covers over
a year of implementation. However, much has changed since the DSNCRP document was
2
approved in 2007. In 2008, Haiti experienced its worst humanitarian disaster in decades,
considerably altering the DSNCRP implementation and priorities.
II. BACKGROUND
4. Haiti experienced a series of unexpected and devastating shocks that threatened
macroeconomic stability, hindered growth, and delayed the DSNCRP implementation.
In April 2008, Haiti experienced riots over rising food and fuel prices which prompted
the resignation of the Prime Minister and led to a five-month political stalemate that
severely constrained government operations, including the approval of key economic
legislation and the FY 2009 budget. Subsequently Haiti was also hit by four back-to-
back hurricanes and tropical storms in August-September, which have caused
extensive food shortages with 60 percent of the fall harvest destroyed. Distribution
networks, transportation, and housing were badly destroyed and damage to
infrastructure is estimated at about 15 percent of GDP. With the assistance of the
international community, an Emergency Post Disaster Assessment (PDNA) was prepared
and estimated the post disaster needs at US$763 million.
5. As a result of the shocks, macroeconomic outcomes in FY 2008 were weaker
than anticipated in the DSNCRP. Official estimates indicate that real GDP growth slowed
to 1.2 percent from 3.4 percent in FY 2007. Twelve-month inflation peaked at 19.8 percent in
September 2008, up from 7.9 percent a year earlier, but declined to 10.1 percent by end-
December and to 1 percent by end-March 2009, owing to rapidly falling international food
and fuel prices. After some small depreciation earlier in the year, the real effective exchange
rate appreciated by about 5 percent during the last quarter of FY 2008, while the Gourde
remained broadly stable against the U.S. dollar. Overall performance against Poverty
Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) program targets at end-September 2008 was
generally satisfactory.
6. In order to reflect new strategic imperatives in the aftermath of the 2008 food
and fuel prices and hurricanes shocks in the context of a severe global economic
downturn, the government launched an Economic Recovery Program in March 2009.
Framed within the DSNCRP and the PDNA, the program seeks to maintain stability,
safeguarding the progress already achieved, and to ensure that the country continues on a
path toward economic security. To this end, it calls for immediate measures to: (i) balance
public finances, (ii) reduce vulnerability to natural disasters, (iii) stimulate the economy to
create jobs rapidly; (iv) maintain access to basic services (health and education), and (v)
rehabilitate infrastructure. The program was endorsed by Haiti’s development partners at the
occasion of the April 2009 donors conference in Washington.
7. A revised budget for FY 2009 including the updated DSNCRP spending was
approved by Parliament at the end of May. With the exception of infrastructure, spending
plans in the FY2009 budget are broadly in line with the DSNCRP. Budget allocations are
3
close to one-third of the three-year DSNCRP spending envelope and for some sectors are
well above this level. The budget also includes reconstruction projects identified through the
PDNA. In spite of larger spending needs to intensify implementation of the DSNCRP and
implement the post-disaster economic recovery program, the authorities were forced to
significantly scale back their original spending plans, due to limited resources and external
budget support.
8. Securing the needed financial resources has been challenging and caused delays
to both the DSNCRP and the PDNA implementations. Owing to the disasters, the original
DSNCRP cost estimates for the first phase (2007-09) was increased to US$4.3 billion from
US$3.9 billion but only 51 percent of that amount has been secured and channeled through
public investment program, while the remaining 49 percent is yet to be secured. At the April
2009 donor’s conference, the economic recovery program received pledges of about US$353
million when the authorities were seeking about US$1 billion in external support.
III. POVERTY TRENDS AND CHARACTERISTICS
9. The Progress Report presents an evaluation of the current dimensions of poverty
and income inequality in Haiti using available data. The poverty analysis is based on a
wide range of available information, including a living conditions survey (2001),
Demographic and Health Surveys (1995, 2001, and 2005) and a population census (2003).
According to the most recent poverty estimates—based on a 2001 survey—54.9 percent of
the population live below the US$1.25-a-day poverty line and 72.1 percent below the US$2-
a-day poverty line. Poverty is particularly high in rural areas. Income inequality is also high,
with a Gini Coefficient of 0.59, among the highest in Latin America and the Caribbean.
10. Haiti is the poorest country in the Latin America and Caribbean region and
amongst the poorest in the world. The 2008 United Nations Human Development Index
ranked Haiti 148th out of 179. Based on current trends, it is very unlikely that Haiti will
achieve most of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015, and making
substantial progress toward achieving the MDG goals will be a challenge.
11. The Haitian government is planning a household survey, anticipated for fiscal
year 2010, which will be used to update poverty estimates and evaluate progress on the
MDG goals. The household consumption survey is essential to update poverty measures
since the last survey was conducted in 2001. The APR does not provide an update of the
preparation of the household survey nor identifies obstacles to its completion. Funding had
been secured through an Inter American Development Bank (IADB) project, supplemented
by funds from the Paris 21 initiative, to carry out the survey in 2008, but the survey was
delayed, first by the political stalemate and later by hurricanes and tropical storms, and the
funds are no longer available. The absence of the survey implied that the World Bank could
not produce a poverty assessment as planned. The household survey would also provide
baselines for several indicators to measure progress on the DSNCRP. Staffs recommend that
4
the Government ensure the survey is completed in a timely manner and their results used to
target future policy. Bank staff are currently pursuing funding for the survey through a trust
fund.
12. The Progress Report presents the Government’s original analysis of changes in
subjective welfare, based on surveys conducted by Vanderbilt University’s Latin
American Public Opinion Project in late 2006 and early 2008. This analysis shows a
substantial decline in welfare, in large part as a consequence of extremely high food prices in
2008. For example, in late 2006, 22.5 percent of Haitians said their income was insufficient
to cover basic food consumption. This percentage had increased to more than a third of
Haitians (34.1 percent) in early 2008. Because the 2008 data was collected before the tropical
storms of August and September, it does not reflect the further deterioration of conditions
that took place that year. As a whole, it is very likely that, due to tropical storm damage and
the surge in food prices, and despite the government’s efforts and modest economic growth,
the average Haitian is now worse off in material terms than in 2007.
IV. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
13. Despite the severe shocks in 2008, Haiti made progress in implementing the
macroeconomic policies set out its DSNCRP. The authorities succeeded in preserving
macroeconomic stability in extremely difficult circumstances by implementing prudent
policies in line with the PRGF-supported program. But the macro framework envisaged in
the original DSNCRP is no longer applicable and DSNCRP implementation has been
delayed. It would have been useful if the progress report clearly showed performance relative
to the objectives set in the original DSNCRP and clarified whether and how the underlying
macro assumptions are being changed for FY 2009-11 to facilitate future monitoring.
14. In light of the severity of the exogenous shocks and global downturn, staff
growth projections are more conservative than those presented in the APR for
FY 2009-11. The report rightfully notes that greater progress could have been achieved had
Haiti not suffer a series of major exogenous shocks since FY 2007/08. But against the
severity of these exogenous shocks and the global downturn, staff projects that domestic
demand is likely to weaken further between FY 2009 and FY 2011 and result in lower GDP
growth than envisaged.
15. Despite falling international prices in FY09, inflation is projected at a higher
level than both the PRGF program target and the initial DSNCRP projection. Falling
international prices have helped lower inflation, but base money growth has continued to be
higher than targeted in the program. Staff concur with the policy objective of the central bank
as noted in the report which is to control inflation by controlling base money growth. Staff
would encourage the central bank to monitor core inflation and monetary aggregates more
actively, improve liquidity management through enhanced coordination with the Ministry of
5
Finance and sterilize as needed the higher central bank financing to the government through
issuance of Central Bank bonds or foreign exchange sales.
16. A discussion of the impact of the international financial crisis would have helped
to better understand possible contagion channels. Because of its low degree of
financial integration, Haiti has not experienced the impact of the crisis through the
direct financial channel but the slowdown in the United States and Canada is already
affecting Haiti through lower export demand and fewer remittances, and through the
impact of lower international commodity prices on fiscal revenue. While Haiti’s export
sector is relatively small (less than 10 percent of GDP), private consumption is highly
dependent on remittances (about 19 percent of GDP in 2008). So far, however, the
drop in remittances has been limited to 3 percent for the second quarter of FY 2009.
If the global slowdown were to persist, and the unemployment rate to worsen in the
United States and Canada, remittances could decline by about 7 percent by end-FY
2009, affecting poor households. Rapidly declining prices for Haiti’s food and fuel
imports are driving down inflation, but at the same time are causing a significant
shortfall in fiscal revenue. Staffs encourage the authorities to accelerate ongoing efforts to
enhance revenue collections in order to protect priority spending.
17. Staff found the discussion on external sector very useful and concur with the
assessment that net international reserves are comfortably above the program floor.
However, the report could have usefully highlighted the risks to the reserves position if the
financial crisis were to last longer than currently anticipated. One of the underlying
assumptions in the original DSNCRP is a sustained level of private transfers of 20 percent of
GDP but, looking forward, the downturn in the United States and Canada may lead to a
sharper than expected decline in remittances which may put pressure on the external reserves
position. On the other hand, the impact of lower commodity prices on imports implies a
small improvement in the external current account position.
18. Although government spending to date has been broadly adjusted to the lower
revenue collections, spending could catch up in the second half of FY 2009 following
approval of the budget. Spending is budgeted in FY 2009 to be higher than in previous
years to address reconstruction needs as well as intensified DSNCRP implementation, which
will continue to guide fiscal policy in the medium term. The FY 2009 budget allocates
substantial resources to social sectors and infrastructure. In line with DSNCRP priorities,
total investment outlays focus on transport, lodging, employment, health, and food security.
19. Finally, in light of all the external shocks that Haiti faced since March 2008, a
reassessment of the various risks and challenges to Haiti macroeconomic stability as
discussed in the original DSNCRP report would have been useful. Such reassessment of
risks would have been timely and would have helped guide the projections for the year. First,
a more fragile political and social situation following the April senatorial elections with run-
offs in June and ongoing tensions between the executive and the legislative branches may
6
cause further delays to key reforms and DSNCRP implementation. Second, the fiscal
situation is likely to remain under pressure as long as the domestic and external resources
remain scarce, and spending needs for reconstruction and poverty reduction remain high.
Third, the downturn in the United States and Canada may lead to a sharper than expected
decline in remittances, affecting poor households, and credit risks in the financial sector may
materialize; and finally, Haiti remains highly vulnerable to natural disasters.
V. GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC SECTOR REFORMS
20. In the area of economic governance, recent advances have been made to increase
transparency and efficiency in the use of public resources and external assistance. These
include changes in the legal framework for budget formulation and execution, the setting up
of critical institutions and agencies, and efforts to disseminate basic information as well as
engage civil society in monitoring the implementation of economic governance reforms.
21. Some improvements were made in public financial management. Actual
expenditures for fiscal years 2006-07 and 2007-08 are generally in line with the approved
budget, and the introduction of a functional classification of expenditure allows for
monitoring of poverty reducing spending. Progress also been made by the Supreme Audit
Institution (Cour Supérieure des Comptes et du Contentieux Administratif) in the completion
of some audit reports and their submission to Parliament. Although not reported in the APR,
staffs also consider important the adoption of a budget preparation and execution manual, as
well as the deployment of public accountants and financial comptrollers to line ministries.
Nonetheless, public financial management processes and controls, and resource management
are still weak, and the overall fiduciary environment is risky. A key challenge is ensuring the
implementation of the new legal framework by building the capacity of central government
agencies for revenue, expenditure, procurement, and human resource management and then
gradually extending coverage to offices handling financial management and planning
functions in sector ministries. On the procurement side, the new procurement law has only
recently been sent to Parliament. However, some improvements in procurement have been
made at the administrative level, and a new system for debt management is being
implemented.
22. Despite reform efforts, public institutions remain weak and are not capable of
effective sector oversight. The criminal justice system functions only minimally, and
corruption is perceived to be widespread. Despite Government efforts, existing control
mechanisms are not strong enough to combat corruption and enforce the rule of law. The
obstacles to improvement are significant. These include a shortage of financial and material
resources; shortages of skilled staff; and insufficient salaries and other incentives to motivate
them. Staffs recommend continuing the efforts to strengthen governance, with an emphasis
on justice and security.
VI. STRUCTURAL AND SOCIAL SECTOR REFORMS
7
23. The DSNCRP has three main pillars: (i) poverty reduction through growth
driven by agriculture, tourism, infrastructure and technology, (ii) human development
actions aimed at broadening coverage of social services, and (iii) strengthening
democratic governance, with emphasis on the judicial sector and security. These three
pillars are complemented by transversal actions in ten areas, including gender, environmental
protection, AIDS, youth and sports, culture, disaster risk management, public sector
management, urban development, land management, handicapped people, and food security.
24. Some progress was made in advancing reforms in these areas, although the
priorities shifted midway through implementation due to the need to implement
emergency actions after the hurricanes. In the growth pillar, the report mentions that the
main achievements in the agriculture sector have been: (i) rehabilitation of irrigation systems,
(ii) watershed management, and (iii) distribution of agricultural inputs and machinery. Staffs
welcome the Government efforts to rehabilitate irrigation systems and watershed
management. Subsidizing agriculture inputs and machinery may be justified given the food
crisis and natural disasters. Nevertheless, staffs recommend improving the way these
subsidies are targeted and passed on to producers by (i) targeting the fiscal resources to those
producers and areas that need them the most; (ii) reducing the administrative costs of
delivering subsidies; (iii) avoiding crowding-out of the private sector and distortion of
farmer's production decisions through high subsidies rates; and (v) avoiding providing goods
at no cost, as adoption rates are drastically reduced when there is no counterpart from
farmers. Staffs recommend the Government continue efforts to improve land management
and support off-farm income generating activities.
25. Regarding infrastructure, some progress towards the original DSNCRP goals is
reported in the APR, although the net effect on the total infrastructure stock remains
uncertain and many of the actions originally envisaged gave way to emergency recovery
actions that took priority. Some new road construction was achieved, but other major
transport infrastructure (bridges, sections of national road No.1) have been severely damaged
or destroyed. Three new electricity generators with a total capacity of 60 megawatts were
installed, and the two main airports were rehabilitated and modernized. Additional
emergency actions included road repairs, the rehabilitation of irrigation systems, school
reconstruction, and the building of fords and temporary overpasses where bridges have been
destroyed. Progress was made on few medium to long-term infrastructure needs, and access
to electricity and piped water remains limited, particularly outside Port-au-Prince.
26. Staffs concur with the Government’s shift of attention and resources towards
emergency actions and recommend renewing the high priority for basic infrastructure
and increasing the focus on maintenance. Progress on reforms in the electricity sector is a
priority, as the sector continues to weigh heavily on public finances. In particular, staffs
encourage the Government to focus on improving the efficiency of the electricity utility
through the reduction of non-technical losses, the strengthening of the management capacity
8
of the firm, improved governance (monitoring of the Power Purchasing Agreements and the
transfers from the State to the electricity sector) and diversification of generation sources.
Improvements in information and communication technology can contribute to achieve many
of the goals of the DSNCRP. Staffs recommend removing remaining monopolies in the
telecommunications sector, in particular in access to international communications
infrastructure to make information and communications more affordable. In staffs view, the
steady enlargement of the road network should also be a priority. Although the Road
Maintenance Fund (FER) has now reached substantial institutional capacity and is funded
from the proceeds of earmarked taxes, the true implementation of a road maintenance
strategy is still pending. The last hurricane season demonstrated that the best maintained
infrastructures are the most resilient to natural disasters. More broadly, a strategy is still
needed to effectively reduce the vulnerability of critical infrastructure and improve
emergency management procedures, particularly in the most vulnerable areas like Gonaives.
The lack of coordination of Haitian institutions in charge of infrastructure management is
hampering the effectiveness of the Government’s interventions.
27. The APR reports on the significant progress made in implementing a
satisfactory mechanism transferring tuition waivers (subsidies) to schools. The tuition
waiver program, which started in school year 2007-08 in two departments, financed tuition
waivers for children previously not enrolled in primary school. In school year 2008-09, the
program has been scaled up in 6 additional regional departments to cover an estimated
80,000 children. This is being verified under an independent audit with results due mid-2009.
The APR also reports that the Ministry of Education has made progress with the teacher
training program and has increased the number of school inspectors. New inspectors have
been trained and deployed to the ten departmental offices, although the inspection results are
not yet available. Staffs congratulate the Ministry on this achievement and encourage them to
rapidly put in place the monitoring system required to document school inspections. Finally,
the APR reports that more than 20 percent of the recurrent budget was allocated to the
education sector.
28. Although not indicated in the APR, there is encouraging progress regarding
school infrastructure. The Haitian Government has made safe schools a national priority in
response to growing evidence of the extreme vulnerability of the country’s school
infrastructure, and it has committed US$ 4.5 million for emergency school reconstruction and
rehabilitation. To support this commitment, the World Bank provided a US$ 5.0 million
grant for the Haiti Emergency School Reconstruction Project to help the Government to
develop a National Plan of Action for Safe Schools, amongst other objectives.
29. In health the APR reports modest advances. Some health infrastructure was
rehabilitated, five new health centers were built and equipped, and equipment was reinforced
in another 11 health centers. Vaccine coverage during the 2007 campaign reached 68 percent
for Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis (DTP) and 70 percent for tuberculosis, while the share
of medically assisted births increased from 24 percent in 2006 to 30 percent in 2008.
9
30. In the staffs’ view, malnutrition is a serious concern in Haiti, with an estimated
one in four children under five chronically malnourished. The food and fuel price shocks
and worldwide economic downturn have likely reduced caloric consumption and raised
malnutrition. The National Coordination for Food Security (CNSA) reported that 2.5 million
Haitians needed food aid in April 2008. In September, after the storms, the number had
increased to 3.3 million, a third of the population.
31. The APR reports notable progress in reducing the incidence of HIV/AIDS,
which has fallen roughly by half over the last decade. Nonetheless, 2.2 percent of Haitian
adults are HIV-positive, the highest national rate outside sub-Saharan Africa. Staffs
encourage the Government to pursue their efforts to improve the health status of the Haitian
population in these areas and others included in the National Strategic Plan for Health Sector
Reform, 2005-10, by concentrating on the effectiveness of public expenditure management
and by reinforcing partnerships with the private sector.
32. Regarding the cross-cutting areas, significant attention was devoted to disaster
risk management, following the series of 2008 storms and hurricanes. The Ministry of
Planning and External Cooperation established a vulnerability reduction unit charged with
preparation of a national vulnerability reduction strategy and its integration into sectoral
strategies and programs, and the monitoring and evaluation of the country’s recovery and
reconstruction program. This unit will also be involved in the revisions of the approved
DSNCRP to acknowledge changes in the priorities. In addition, a Country Note and Action
Plan was prepared to guide the significant scaling up of the World Bank’s Disaster Risk
Management program in Haiti.
VII. PROCESS AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION
33. The Government initiated the implementation of the DSNCRP in January 2008.
The first steps included adopting an institutional framework of responsibilities, agreeing to a
list of priority operational actions under each pillar in coordination with beneficiaries and
civil society organizations, agreeing to a results framework including the choice of specific
indicators, and allocating resources in accordance with those priorities under the draft 2008-
09 public investment budget.
34. Staffs commend the Government for the participatory and inclusive nature of
their monitoring mechanisms, under the leadership of the Ministry of Planning and
External Cooperation. The participatory monitoring structures described in the report
include a wide range of stakeholders, and the qualitative instruments used are valuable. Staffs
recommend making implementation more agile by streamlining the numerous
implementation structures within the Government.
35. Continued work will be needed to improve monitoring and evaluation. The main
challenge is the generation of statistics, whose paucity explains why baselines and data
sources for indicators are not specified. There is still a need, already noted in the JSAN of the
10
DSNCRP, to link indicators to specific priority actions so that progress towards achievement
of objectives can be monitored continuously and authorities can have clear guidance to
change course when actions are not attaining their objectives.
36. The household consumption survey is essential to update poverty measures since
the last survey was conducted in 2001. The absence of this survey implied that the World
Bank could not produce a poverty assessment in 2008 as planned. The household survey
would also provide baselines for several indicators to measure progress on the DSNCRP.
Staffs recommend that the Government ensure the survey is completed in a timely manner
and their results used to target future policy actions under the DSNCRP.
VIII. CONCLUSIONS, RISKS AND SUGGESTED ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION
37. The first Annual Progress Report gives a generally fair assessment of progress
achieved and challenges encountered in implementing the DSNCRP. The report takes
into account many comments made in the Joint Staff Advisory Note on the 2007 DSNCRP.
Staff commend the government on the steps accomplished under difficult circumstances, in
particular for the adoption of an institutional framework of responsibilities, the agreement on
a list of priority actions in coordination with beneficiaries and civil society organizations, the
agreement on a result framework, and for the allocation of resources in line with the draft
2008-09 public investment budget priorities.
38. Aside from unforeseen external shocks, there remains a number of challenges to
Haiti’s successful implementation of its strategy. First, while mobilizing the needed
financing is the cornerstone of the strategy, full financing has yet to be secured. Second, the
strategy focuses squarely on the ability to increase the Haitian government’s capacity to
spend and to spend well. Third, the fragile political and social situation may delay key
reforms and DSNCRP implementation.
39. In future reports, the government may wish to better reconcile the budget and
the sectoral costing strategies to clearly identify the additional resources needed, to keep
track of DSNCRP spending execution and to report progress on a small subset of key
indicators in each sector.
40. Do Executive Directors agree with the staffs’ assessment that the Haitian
authorities have made reasonable progress in implementing the DSNCRP under the
difficult circumstances they faced? Do they agree that they have taken sufficiently
proactive actions in shifting their priorities as a result of those circumstances?
FIRST ANNUAL REPORT ON GPRSP
IMPLEMENTATION
(2007-2008)
Making a Qualitative Leap
Forward*
February 2009
*
English Translation of Official Original Document in French
Official Original Document in French Available at http://www.mpce.gouv.ht
Copyright 09-04-177 National Library of Haiti
Final version printed in April 2009 by XXX, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation (MPCE) 2009.
All rights reserved.
2
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS
AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
ARV Antiretroviral
BCG Tuberculosis vaccine [Bacille de Calmette et de Guérin]
BDS Departmental School Office [Bureau Départemental Scolaire]
CAP Priority Arbitration Committee [Comité d’Arbitrage des Priorités]
CBO Community-based Organization
CICSMO Interministerial Committee for Implementation Coordination and Monitoring [Comité
Interministériel de Coordination et de Suivi de la Mise en Œuvre]
COSI Strategic Orientation Investment Council [Conseil d’Orientation Stratégique de l’Investissement]
CPD Civil Protection Directorate
CSAFP Higher Council for Government and Civil Service Affairs [Conseil Supérieur de l’Administration et de
la Fonction Publique]
CSCCA Supreme Court for Audits and Administrative Disputes
DAC Donor Advisory Committee
DDE Departmental Directorate for Education
DTP Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis
EFA Education for All
EFACAP Basic School and Center for Pedagogical Support [Ecole Fondamentale et Centre d’Appui Pédagogique]
EPA Economic Partnership Agreement
FAES Economic and Social Assistance Fund [Fonds d’Assistance Economique et Sociale]
FIOP Project Identification and Operation Card [Fiche d’Identité et d’Opération de Projets]
GAC Community Group and Association
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GPRS Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy
GPRSP Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
LA Latin America
MDG Millennium Development Goals
MEF Ministry of Economy and Finance
MENFP Ministry of National Education and Professional Training
MPCE Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation
MTBF Medium-Term Budgetary Framework
MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
NIC National Investment Council
OMRH Human Resource Management Office [Office de Management des Ressources Humaines]
ONPES National Observatory on Poverty and Social Exclusion [Observatoire National de la Pauvreté et de
l’Exclusion Sociale]
PAGE Program to Support Economic Governance [Programme d’Appui à la Gouvernance Economique]
PARQUE Support Program for Improvement of the Quality of Education [Programme d’Appui au Renforcement
de la Qualité de l’Education]
PBG Policy Base Grant
PDL Local Development Program [Programme de Développement Local]
PIP Public Investment Program
PLIP GPRSP Priority Investment Plan [Plan d’investissements Prioritaires du DSNCRP]
PMCT Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission
PNH Haitian National Police [Police Nationale d’Haïti]
PPP Purchasing Power Parity
3
PREH Program to Strengthen Haiti’s Economy [Programme de Renforcement de l’Economie d’Haïti]
PRGF Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility
PRS Poverty Reduction Strategy
PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
QPM Qualitative Participatory Monitoring
SCDCSMO Departmental Technical Subcommittee for Implementation Coordination and Monitoring [Sous-
Comité Technique Départemental de Coordination et de suivi de la mise en œuvre]
SCTICSMO Interministerial Subcommittee for Implementation Coordination and Monitoring [Sous-comité
Interministériel de Coordination et de Suivi de la Mise en Œuvre]
SECICSMO Executive Secretariat of the Interministerial Subcommittee for Implementation Coordination and
Monitoring [Secrétariat Exécutif du Comité Interministériel de Coordination et de Suivi de la Mise en
Œuvre]
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance (inspection, verification, testing, and certification company)
SPGRD Risk and Disaster Prevention and Management System
TDC Table Départementale de Concentration
UEP Design and Programming Unit [Unité d’Etudes et de Programmation]
UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
4
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I: GPRSP IMPLEMENTATION
Context
Revision of the macroeconomic framework
Readjustment of initial priorities
Institutional framework
Main Implementation Phases
Organizational phase
Feedback, awareness-building, and ownership phase
Operational phase
Constraints, Solutions, and Prospects
Institutional framework
Statistical information system
Capacity-building
Next phases in implementation
CHAPTER II: MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
Recent economic situation
Macroeconomic outlook for 2009-2010
Macroeconomic objectives for 2009-2010
CHAPTER III: SOCIAL SITUATION
Trends in poverty reduction expenditure
Trends in poverty and inequality
Trends in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
CHAPTER IV: GROWTH AND POVERTY REDUCTION OBJECTIVES AND THE MAIN
OUTCOMES
Restatement of the growth and poverty reduction objectives
Pillar 1. Growth Vectors Sectors
Agriculture and Rural Development
Infrastructure: Roads and Electricity
5
Pillar II. Human Development Sectors
Education and Vocational Training
Health
Pillar III. Democratic Governance Sectors
Justice and Public Security
Local Governance
Crosscutting Sectors
Food Security
Social Protection and Persons with Special Needs
Youth, Sports, and Civic Actions
Gender Equality
Environment and Sustainable Development
Disaster and Risk Reduction
Multisectoral HIV/AIDS Programs
State Capacity Building
Territorial Development
Culture and Communication
CHAPTER V: MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Quantitative Monitoring
Participatory Qualitative Monitoring
CHAPTER VI: STATUS OF COMPLETION POINT TRIGGERS
Public Finance and Economic Governance Reforms
Structural Reforms
Education
Health
Debt Management
CONCLUSION
ANNEXES
Annex1: Comparative Table Reviewing the Macroeconomic Framework
Annex 2: Institutional Framework Implementing and Monitoring the Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP 2008-2010)
Annex 3: Main GPRSP Monitoring Indicators
Annex 4: The MDG Situation
Annex 5: The Poverty and Inequality Situation
Annex 6: Increase in Poverty among the Population and its Vulnerability
Annex 7: Trends and Projections of 13 of the 48 MDG Indicators
Annex 8: Chart of Priority Actions
Annex 9: Status of Completion Point Triggers
6
Executive Summary
1 The Republic of Haiti is facing major challenges owing to the commitments made and
agreements signed with international partners with respect to reforms. In fact, Haiti
made a commitment to undertake a series of reforms in the context of Poverty
Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) programs, the completion point triggers for the
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) and, more specifically, the preparation of a Poverty Reduction Strategy
Paper (PRSP).
2 The Haitian authorities therefore launched a series of actions with the aim of executing
these reforms, for which quantitative and qualitative performance criteria were set and
point to the achievement of noteworthy progress. The outcomes of these reforms
suggest that Haiti has made significant progress toward achievement of the completion
point under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, supported by the
Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF).
3 Having reached the decision point in October 2006, which enabled Haiti to benefit
from interim debt relief vis-à-vis its debtors, the country implemented a large number
of reforms aimed at receiving permanent debt relief, expected in June 2009, in addition
to allocating greater resources to poverty reduction. In this regard, the participatory
approach to the Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP) and its
implementation, accompanied by a macroeconomic stabilization policy, represent an
important step toward making the qualitative leap sought, with a view to achieving the
country’s sustainable development.
4 Needless to say, an ongoing effort is required to strengthen the impact of the
Government’s poverty-related efforts and the effective use of both national resources
and development assistance. The Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
(GPRSP) should clearly be updated at regular intervals in order to adapt it to situations
that may arise during the course of its execution. These annual implementation
progress reports should be drafted and discussed at the national level and shared with
international community partners, in particular the Bretton Woods Institutions.
5 The implementation context of the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) since the time of
its adoption by the Government in September 2007 has been characterized in particular
by numerous events experienced by Haiti during the first year of implementation,
which have jeopardized a number of objectives and results targeted for 2008. These
events include the increase in food and fuel prices on the international market and four
devastating hurricanes that hit the country in August and September 2008. The
Government had to provide emergency humanitarian assistance as well as assistance to
repair destroyed or damaged physical infrastructure.
6 In light of these events, the authorities had no choice but to revise the growth
objectives targeted for 2007-2008. The projected GDP growth rate of 3.7 percent had
to be revised downward to 1.5 percent, owing to persistently high food and oil prices
on the international market since the end of the first six-month period, and its effects at
the national level, as well as the disasters that struck the agricultural sector,
infrastructure, and general production in the wake of hurricanes Fay, Gustave, Hannah,
7
and Ike, the damage of which was approximately 15 percent of GDP. The most recent
preliminary estimates provided by the Haitian Institute of Statistics and Data
Processing [Institut Haïtien de Statistiques et d’Informatique IHSI] pointed to an
anemic growth rate of 1.3 percent in 2008. Owing to the aforementioned factors, 2008-
2009 started in a less favorable context than the preceding fiscal year, with a projected
growth rate of 2.5 percent.
7 Without a doubt, the damage caused by these hurricanes has reduced economic growth.
The immediate reaction of the Government has been to launch a major emergency
program using its own funds, in order to make the main roads traversable and to repair
a number of health and school facilities, with the aim of ensuring the opening of
schools and the resumption of agricultural production. Likewise, with a view to
preserving the gains made over the past five years, the Government had to recalibrate
its objectives and take appropriate measures to minimize the impact of the food crisis
on the purchasing power of the poorest population sectors, lessen the damage wrought
by the disasters, improve basic education and health services, and complete basic
infrastructure in order to stimulate economic recovery, particularly agricultural
production. These measures are in line with those set in the Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP), and the Program to Strengthen Haiti’s Economy
[Programme de Renforcement de l’Economie d’Haïti PREH] known as the gap
program [programme de soudure] resulting from this strategy is an accelerator or
supplement rather than a substitute for the entire government program. Consequently, it
should not be construed as a reversal of course, but rather as an effort aimed at making
up for losses resulting from the economic downturn.
8 The implementation mechanism, namely the National Investment Council (CNI), has a
two-pronged structure: one is strategic and operates under the sponsorship of the
President of Haiti and the arbitration of the Prime Minister and is composed of the
Strategic Orientation Investment Council (COSI), the Donor Advisory Committee
(DAC), and the Priority Arbitration Committee (CAP), and the other is operational and
is chaired by the Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation (MCPE) and the
Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), through the Interministerial Committee for
Implementation Coordination and Monitoring (CICSMO), with assistance from an
Executive Secretariat. These two levels include the main development partners, namely:
the sectoral ministries, civil society, and international partners.
9 The Executive Secretariat of the Interministerial Subcommittee for Implementation
Coordination and Monitoring (SECICSMO) provides coordination and operational
monitoring of the strategy with the support of State and non-State entities at both the
sectoral and territorial levels. In January 2008, the implementation process was started,
based on the following main phases: organizational, feedback, awareness-building,
ownership, and operational, which facilitated the establishment of coordination and
monitoring entities, the organization of workshops, seminars, and feedback sessions, as
well as awareness-building and ownership of the GPRSP with such different entities as
civil society organizations and groups, ministerial officials, senior officials, and civil
society representatives in the region.
10 The operationalization of implementation took place through priority action sectoral
matrices, the listing of programs and projects under way corresponding to GPRSP
priority actions, sectoral action plans resulting from priority action matrices that list the
resources to be deployed by each sector, the Priority Investment Plan resulting from
8
sectoral plans, the final choice of monitoring indicators of objectives, the results and
impact of the GPRS executed jointly with the various partner sectors, and the inclusion
of programs and projects implementing GPRSP priority actions in the 2008-2009
Public Investment Program.
11 State modernization is continuing. Economic governance was improved with the
institutional strengthening of the central government, review of the legal framework of
a number of centralized public institutions, correction of the financial management and
budgeting process and procedures, strengthening of the public procurement system,
and ramped up efforts to combat corruption.
12 Given the myriad political, economic, and social challenges facing the country, growth
prospects are, in general terms, modest for FY 2008-2009. The work to be done as well
as the work currently under way mainly through the post-hurricane emergency program
implemented immediately after these hurricanes and the adjustment program currently
being prepared by the Government lead to the projection of a positive GDP growth rate
on the order of 2.5 percent in 2009 and higher growth in subsequent years, the goal
being achievement of the 4.5 percent rate initially targeted in the Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP).
13 In the context of Paris Club commitments, an automatic public expenditure monitoring
mechanism specifically linked to poverty reduction was introduced in Haiti’s general
budget. This mechanism has facilitated the assessment of work done through Public
Treasury appropriations allocated to various items related to employment, food
security, energy supply, transportation, sanitation, drinking water, health, education,
and social protection.
14 The recent natural disasters, which took a heavy toll on the homes and finances of
households that were already vulnerable, exacerbated the poverty situation. In 1987,
poverty statistics (in monetary terms), indicated that more than 60 percent of Haitians
lived on less than US$1 a day (extreme poverty) in the country as a whole. This
situation improved slightly in 2000, when 48 percent of Haitians were living on less
than US$1 a day. The proportion of the population living in extreme poverty climbed
to 55 percent in 2001, a seven-percentage point increase. The relative poverty index
also changed considerably. In 1987, the proportion of the population living on less than
US$2 in PPP terms stood at 59.6 percent, while in 2001, this percentage stood at 76
percent. The monetary poverty situation indicates that the proportion of persons living
in extreme poverty is increasing at a faster rate than the proportion of persons living in
relative poverty. Also, income distribution remains a major concern in light of
heightened inequality.
15 Positioning Haiti to overcome the time lag with respect to the Millennium
Development Goals is one of the major challenges contained in the GPRSP. Thirteen
of the fourteen impact monitoring indicators used to track the GPRSP are MDG
indicators. However, we have good reason to question the possibility of achieving
predefined targets. The available figures show that few of the MDG targets will be
achieved by 2015, as the gaps that remain are too wide. Examples include maternal
health, where the trend has been reversed (from progress to regression), and infant
mortality, where progress is rather slow. However, other targets could be achieved if
appropriate measures are taken in a timely manner. We note the progress made, albeit
slowly, in reducing the percentage of the population without access to drinking water
and reasonable trends in school enrollment and literacy rates in relation to the targets to
9
be met.
16 In order to assess the result or effects of actions targeting growth and poverty
reduction, the methodology used consisted, in the areas for which new information is
available relative to the information used to prepare the assessment provided in the
GPRSP, of examining the direction of the trend yielding this new information. This
approach is based on the fact that in general, an impact assessment has not yet been
done of Government actions taken in the past twelve months. The main achievements
during the first year of execution appear in Chapter IV of the report.
17 Some of the more relevant results according to GPRSP pillars, particularly for the
priority sectors, show that many of the interventions took place in the agricultural
sector (rehabilitation of irrigation systems, development of watersheds, distribution of
inputs and agricultural tools); the infrastructure sector (repair and building of roads and
bridges, urban and electricity rehabilitation); the educational sector (back-to-school
subsidies, school cafeterias, construction and/or repair of schools); the health sector
(repair of hospitals, vaccinations, combating HIV/AIDS); and the justice sector
(construction and repair of courts and police stations).
18 Project financing which was, to some degree, synchronized with GPRSP pillars and
objectives, accounted for 82 percent of total Public Investment Program (PIP)
appropriations for FY 2007-2008 and for 87 percent of total Public Investment
Program appropriations for FY 2008-2009. Because they were identified and prepared
prior to drafting of the GPRSP, it is difficult to use performance indicators for these
projects instead of the indicators identified in the Priority Investment Plan. Domestic
financing declined from 13 percent for FY 2007-2008 to 12 percent for FY 2008-2009,
while external resources rose from 87 percent to 88 percent during that same period.
This funding during the first two years of GPRSP execution represents 51 percent of
estimated project cost; consequently, 49 percent will have to be identified for the final
year of execution.
19 GPRSP funding is not completely guaranteed for the first three years of its execution
taking into account estimated needs and appropriations for FY 2007-2008 and FY2008-
2009. In fact, of the G 172,745,182,209 (US$4,318, 629,555) in estimated costs, 51
percent of this amount was allocated to public investment programs for 2007-2008 and
2008-2009, leaving a shortfall of G 86,134,062,382 (US$2,153,351,560), representing
49 percent of the estimated cost of the GPRSP.
20 This report is composed of six chapters. The first covers the context and the main
implementation phases, as well as constraints, solutions, and prospects. The second
presents the macroeconomic framework and discusses the recent economic situation,
the outlook for 2009-2010, as well as the macroeconomic objectives for that period.
The third chapter addresses the social situation for the period 2007-2008 using trends
in poverty reduction expenditure and the millennium goals for Haiti’s development.
The fourth presents a number of specific results achieved in the priority sectors of
agriculture, road infrastructure and electricity, education, health, and justice. The fifth
chapter presents the monitoring and evaluation system established and the final chapter
discusses the situation in February 2009 with respect to the completion point triggers.
10
Introduction
21 This document is the first annual report on implementation of the Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy (GPRS). This strategy was prepared using a dynamic and open
process in which civil society, development partners, and all public administrations
participated and contributed once Haiti reached the decision point under the Heavily
Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative in October 2006. Validated by the
Government following a national forum in September 2007, the GPRSP was submitted
to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, whose Executive Boards
approved it in November 2007. This report covers the period October 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2008.
22 This annual report reviews the main implementation phases from an institutional
standpoint, presents trends in the macroeconomic and social situation in the country,
and the main areas of progress during the first year of execution of the GPRSP, while
analyzing the functioning of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, and concludes
with a progress report on completion point triggers.
23 The report is the product of collaboration among the sectoral ministries responsible for
the application of the Government’s public policies through the various sectoral
priority action plans, the analysis of the National Observatory on Poverty and Social
Exclusion (ONPES) on poverty trends and the Millennium Development Goals, as well
as the monitoring of output indicators for the GPRSP and the Executive Secretariat of
the Interministerial Committee for GPRSP Implementation Coordination and
Monitoring (SECICSMO).
11
Chapter I
GPRSP
Implementation
Context
24 The first Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP) for the Republic of
Haiti covers a three-year period. Each year, the Government is required to submit an
annual progress report (APR) in order to demonstrate the progress made with
implementation of the strategy. Needless to say, an ongoing effort is required to
enhance the impact of Government intervention in the area of poverty and the effective
use of both domestic resources and development assistance. It is therefore important to
update the Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy at regular intervals in order to adapt
it to situations that may arise during the course of its execution. These annual
implementation progress reports should be drafted and discussed at the national level
and submitted to the Bretton Woods Institutions.
25 The implementation context of the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) since the time of
its adoption by the Government in September 2007 has been characterized in particular
by numerous events experienced by Haiti during the first year of implementation,
which have jeopardized a number of the objectives and results targeted for 2008. We
need only mention the riots in April 2008, sparked by the increase in food and fuel
prices and the climate and humanitarian disasters resulting from the impact of the
passage over Haiti of four devastating hurricanes in September 2008, prompting the
Government to provide emergency humanitarian assistance as well as assistance with
destroyed or damaged physical infrastructure.
Revision of the Macroeconomic Framework
26 The macroeconomic framework had to be revised to reflect the new situation. In fact,
the initially targeted growth objectives (GDP - 3.7 percent) had to be revised
downward (1.3 percent), owing to persistently high food and oil prices on the
international market and its effects at the national level, as well as the disasters that
struck the agricultural sector, infrastructure, and production in general in the wake of
four successive hurricanes, the damage of which was estimated at approximately 15
percent of GDP. The inflation rate rose markedly, from 7.9 percent in September 2007
to 19.8 percent in September 2008. However, an inflation rate of 5 percent is projected
for end-2009, compared to the estimated 9.5 percent rate (comparative table on trends
in macroeconomic framework in Annex No. 1).
27 While the exchange rate was trending upward, ranging from an average of G 36 to G
12
40 to US$1 between 2005 and 2006 when the document was drafted, an exchange rate
of G 40 to US$1 was used in the initial document, while the exchange rate projected
for 2008-2009 is approximately G 40 to US$1.
28 Macroeconomic policy projects cover essentially the 2007-2011 period, and seek to
preserve and maintain macroeconomic stabilization. These policies also target the
completion of structural reforms and the continuation of all measures furthering
achievement of the completion point. However, objectives run the risk of being
stymied by such factors as legislative elections, global food and fuel prices, and climate
change taking into account Haiti’s vulnerability in this area. However, under the
scenarios provided in the initial document, average growth rates of 6 percent and 4
percent through 2015 were used, under an optimistic scenario and a baseline scenario
respectively (refer to pages 117 and 118 of the GPRSP).
29 In the fiscal and taxation spheres, targets have been revised in the area of revenues and
expenditures, given that revenue objectives fell short of expectations and expenditure
needs were greater. However, the need to raise taxes from 10 percent in 2006 to 14
percent in 2011 remained unchanged, as did the need to reduce current expenditure to
an average of 45.5 percent of all public expenditure for the period 2007-2011. Fiscal
policy will be more expansionary. In the monetary policy sphere, an inflation-targeting
approach and exchange rate sterilization in the context of a flexible exchange rate
policy are expected.
Readjustment of Initial Priorities
30 The damage caused by the hurricanes has, without a doubt, reduced economic growth
and the immediate reaction of the Government has been to launch an emergency
program using its own funds, in order to make the main roads traversable and to repair
a number of health and school facilities, with the aim of ensuring the opening of
schools and the resumption of agricultural production. This program did not, however,
cover all losses, estimated at US$1 billion or 15 percent of GDP.
31 Consequently, the Government, with a view to preserving the gains made over the past
five years, had to readjust its objectives and take appropriate measures to minimize the
impact of the food crisis on the purchasing power of the poorest population sectors,
lessen the damage wrought by the disasters, improve basic education and health
services, and complete basic infrastructure in order to stimulate economic recovery,
particularly agricultural production.
32 These measures are in line with those set forth in the Growth and Poverty Reduction
Strategy (GPRS), and the gap program, namely the Program to Strengthen Haiti’s
Economy (PREH) [programme de soudure] resulting from this strategy, is an
accelerator or supplement rather than a substitute for the entire government policy.
Consequently, it should not be construed as a reversal of course, but rather as an effort
aimed at making up for losses resulting from the economic downturn.
33 This program consists of three main components: disaster and risk reduction, the
growth vector pillar and human development pillar, taken directly from the GPRSP,
and the third pillar, democratic governance, which is covered largely by projects
already under way. The crosscutting policies fit into each area listed in the fast-acting
program, which should cover the setbacks attributable to damaged infrastructure and
provide the resources necessary to continue to provide basic services to the population.
13
Institutional Framework
34 The implementation mechanism, namely the National Investment Council (CNI), has a
two-pronged structure: one is strategic and operates under the sponsorship of the
President and the arbitration of the Prime Minister and is composed of the Strategic
Orientation Investment Council (COSI), the Donor Advisory Committee (DAC), and
the Priority Arbitration Committee (CAP), and the other is operational and is chaired
by the Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation (MCPE) and the Ministry of
Economy and Finance (MEF), through the Interministerial Committee for
Implementation Coordination and Monitoring (CICSMO), with assistance from an
Executive Secretariat. These two levels serve as the main development partners, namely:
the sectoral ministries, civil society, and donors.
35 The Executive Secretariat of the Interministerial Subcommittee for Implementation
Coordination and Monitoring (SECICSMO) provides coordination and operational
monitoring of the strategy with the support of State and non-State entities at both the
sectoral and territorial levels. The institutional framework for GPRSP implementation
listing its various entities and their respective responsibilities are shown in Annex 2.
Main Implementation Phases
36 In January 2008, the GPRSP implementation process was started based on the
following main phases: organizational, feedback, awareness-building, ownership, and
operational.
Organizational Phase
37 Strategic-level entities: the Strategic Orientation Investment Council (COSI), the Donor
Advisory Committee (DAC), and the Priority Arbitration Committee (CAP) are not yet
officially up and running. At the operational level, the Interministerial Committee for
Implementation Coordination and Monitoring (CICSMO) is up and running and is
chaired by the Minister of Planning and External Cooperation. The Executive
Secretariat of CICSMO, the key entity for the entire implementation mechanism, the
Interministerial Subcommittee for Sectoral Coordination and Monitoring (SCTICSMO),
and the Departmental Subcommittees for Implementation Coordination and Monitoring
in the regions (SCDCSMOs) have been established. SCTICSMO is holding its ninth
monthly coordination and monitoring meeting. However, these two subcommittees are
not yet fully up to speed, owing to the delayed submission of periodic sectoral
implementation progress reports and sectoral work plans as a result of weak or non-
existent Design and Programming Units (UEPs) in the ministries. The National
Observatory on Poverty and Social Exclusion (ONPES), a unit in the Ministry of
Planning and External Cooperation, has been established and handles, in conjunction with
the Office for Economic and Social Planning of this Ministry, coordination of the GPRSP
monitoring and evaluation mechanism.
14
Feedback, Awareness-building, and Ownership Phase
38 Activities are delayed owing to the lack of funding for the communications plan that
has been prepared and is awaiting signing by the UNDP of the financing agreement in
the context of the Project to Support GPRSP implementation. However, feedback,
awareness-building, and ownership workshops have been organized in the ten
departmental administrative centers [chefs-lieux] and are continuing at the invitation of
a number of ministries and organized civil society groups. Similarly, a newspaper and
brochures entitled “GPRSP Bulletins” disseminating information on the content of the
GPRSP and providing information on the implementation process is continuing, with
the publication of the issue No. 4 in the series. Moreover, three project planning and
preparation training courses, geared toward officials in the Program and Design Units
of ministries and the Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation, have been
organized and others have already been planned for 2009.
Operational Phase
39 The following main activities have been conducted:
Preparation of the Inventory of Programs and Projects (IPPs) being executed and
corresponding to GPRSP priority programs, with a view to collecting data that should
facilitate assessment of the initial results of the execution of programs and projects
during the first year of GPRSP implementation (see the list the public investment
programs and project document at http://www.mpce.gouv.ht).
Preparation of Priority Action Sectoral Matrices in conjunction with the sectors
involved, including a system organizing priorities and an analysis of the estimated
cost of priority actions. The action matrices have been prepared based on the major
works of the Government reorganized in three pillars and supported by targeted and
crosscutting policies and strategies set forth in the GPRSP (see the Priority Action
Matrices – GPRSP document at http://www.mpce.gouv.ht).
Preparation of the Priority Investment Plan (PIP) which sets forth the resources to be
implemented, by area, to promote growth and combat the downward spiral into poverty
and destitution being experienced in the country. This plan is the product of the Sectoral
Priority Action Matrices and includes the programs and projects selected for the first
three years of GPRSP execution (2008-2010) (see the GPRSP Priority Investment Plan
for 2008-2010 document at http://www.mpce.gouv.ht).
Choice of GPRSP monitoring indicators made in conjunction with the various sectoral
partners (see the main GPRSP monitoring indicators document, Annex No. 3).
Listing of PIP programs and projects for 2008-2009 operationalizing GPRSP priority
actions (See Public Investment Program for 2008-2009 at http://www.mpce.gouv.ht).
Constraints, Solutions, and Prospects
Institutional Framework
15
40 The clear directives that should come from the strategic entities are not provided on a
regular basis. However, the implementation process continues while awaiting any
necessary corrections from the strategic entities. Nonetheless, the different strategic
entities are informed of the phases of the process, given that they are furnished with
reports on monthly SCTICSMO meetings on a regular basis, as well as implementation
progress guides and monthly progress reports. In addition, the Minister of Planning and
External Cooperation keeps the Prime Minister and President of Haiti as well as the
Donor Advisory Committee directly apprised of GPRSP implementation progress,
based on a report from the Executive Secretariat of the Interministerial Committee for
Coordination and Monitoring.
Statistical Information System
41 Despite the work done (household surveys, poverty map, and population survey), the
statistical system is facing daunting problems in terms of the coordination of work and
the generation of macroeconomic and sectoral statistics. It is hoped that the
Memorandum of Understanding between the MEF and MPCE on a basic statistical
project would alleviate this major problem. A program aimed at strengthening sectoral
statistics in the various ministries would supplement work being done.
42 The output-based planning system (patterned after the MTEF), which facilitates
assessment of the appropriateness of public expenditure in relation to GPRSP strategic
orientations, is still not operating properly. In order to ensure better linkage between
GPRSP orientation and the budget, the Medium Term Expenditure Framework
(MTEF) and the Medium Term Budget Framework (MTBF) will be gradually
introduced.
Capacity Building
43 In the context of technical support from the international community to Haiti, capacity-
building of the Design and Planning Unit (UEP) of the priority sectoral ministries is
expected. A lack of institutional capacity can jeopardize sound implementation of the
Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy. Technical support for “coordination of
government action,” “coordination of development assistance,” and the “formulation of
sectoral policy” is being sought.
44 The MCPE, through its various technical entities and with OPES support, is being
mobilized in order to ensure coordinated monitoring of the execution of all the priority
actions set forth in the GPRSP. Monitoring and evaluation instruments are designed in
such a way as to ensure the monitoring of actions. Involvement of the MEF and
sectoral institutions in activities upstream and throughout the process serves to
guarantee a functioning coordination system. The set up and operationalization of the
Design and Programming Units (UEPs) will strengthen the system.
45 In the area of qualitative participatory monitoring, the process is proceeding apace.
The training of trainers by volunteers from grassroots organizations to collect data on
the views of beneficiaries with respect to the impact of the GPRSP will supplement the
annual sector program and project execution assessment. Ten new technical officials
have just been recruited to strengthen the departmental offices of the MPCE, in
particular with the training of Departmental Subcommittees for GPRSP Coordination
16
and Monitoring and grassroots organizations in the area of institutional and technical
capacity building, with a view to better representativeness.
17
Next Phases in Implementation
46 The following are the next phases of implementation: (i) Adaptation of the format of
physical and financial progress reports for the programs and projects listed in the PIP
so that they can be more closely aligned with GPRSP implementation monitoring and
evaluation needs; (ii) Validation of the manual of procedures and operating methods of
the entities involved with the GPRSP mechanism for implementation coordination and
monitoring; (iii) Preparation of a basic common reference framework and its
methodological support for the information system for GPRSP and MDG monitoring;
and (iv) Mid-term evaluation of the GPRSP monitoring and coordination mechanisms.
18
Chapter II
Macroeconomic Framework
Recent Economic Situation
47 Implementation of the Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy (GPRSP) took place in
an unstable environment, characterized in 2008 by intense shocks that greatly
undermined the progress made in the area of poverty reduction. Following two years of
significant improvement in the economic situation, with a positive GDP growth rate in
real terms of 2.3 percent in 2006 and 3.4 percent in 2007, the growth rate fell to 1.3
percent in FY 2007-2008, while the inflation rate, projected to be under 10 percent,
instead doubled, a factor that helped fuel a food crisis.
48 Per capita GDP remained below the GPRSP projection (See Table No. 1 below). As a
result, little progress was made in the area of monetary poverty, while vulnerability
increased as a result of the rise in the cost of living and the loss of capital resulting
from the hurricanes, despite the efforts made to redistribute aid to the poorest and
disaster-stricken population groups. Consequently, it is of vital importance to step up
efforts if the poverty rate is to be reduced by 2011. In light of this, the projected growth
rate of 2.5 percent for 2008-2009 is too low.
Table No. 1 – Macroeconomic Performance and Monetary Poverty Indicators
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Real GDP annual growth
1.8% 2.3% 3.4% 1.3% 2.5% 3.5% 4.5%
rate
Inflation (average annual
14.8% 14.2% 8.9% 14.3% 5.0% 8% 7.5%
change) as a %
Public savings as a % of
1.3 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0
GDP
Total revenue as a % of
9.6 % 9.9% 10.1% 10.1% 10.5% 12.0% 14.0%
PIB
Total expenditure as a *
10.1% 10.7% 11.8% 11.6% 11.0% - -
of % GDP
Current balance of
payments excluding -1.6 -1.4 -0.4 -2.6 -3.6 -
grants (% of GDP)
Net foreign exchange
reserves (in US$ 70.4 130.2 269.1 288.6 237.0 250 262
millions)
19
Annual change in the
nominal exchange rate in
relation to the US dollar
as a
%* -1.56% 6.6 % -9.8% 2.3% 2.5% 3.5% 4%
Projected baseline Per capita GDP growth rate 1.4% 2.4% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9%
GPRSP
Projected poverty rate 55% 53.5% 52.4% 51.2% 50.2
Per capita GDP growth rate 1.1% -0.8% 0.4%* - -
Actual Poverty rate 55.2 55.7 55.4** - -
Source: GPRSP and adjusted figures based on IHSI data and using the Ravallion elasticity formula; Ministry of
Economy and Finance (MEF); Bank of the Republic of Haiti (BRH); and the Haitian Institute for Statistics and Data
Processing (IHSI)
• Expenditure excluding external financing of investment projects.
** Figure based on a projected growth rate of 2.5% for 2008/09
49 The GDP growth rate of 3.7 percent projected for 2007-2008 had to be revised
downward to 1.5 percent during the fiscal year (1.3 percent according to the latest IHSI
projections) owing to the effects of the persistent rise in international food and fuel
prices on domestic prices, the level of economic activity, as well as the damage
inflicted on the agricultural sector by hurricanes Fay, Gustave, Hannah, and Ike, which
reduced GDP by approximately 15 percent, according to a joint UNDP/EU/World
Bank assessment. These events have resulted in a less favorable and more fragile
situation for 2008-2009, all the more so since the international financial crisis is
deepening and poses a threat to private transfers in particular, which account for
approximately 17 percent of GDP and support household consumption.
Real GDP Growth Rate
50 Despite these negative shocks, macroeconomic stability has been preserved in broad terms.
The implementation of the program supported by the IMF under the Poverty Reduction
and Growth Facility has been rated satisfactory, based on the fourth review of the program
covering the fiscal year ending in September 2008. All quantitative performance criteria
20
have been met, with the exception of those pertaining to the credit limit of the Central
Bank to the non-financial public sector, which exceeded a mere 0.1 percent of GDP.
Three of the five structural benchmarks were achieved.
51 The year-on-year inflation rate rose from 7.9 percent in September 2007 to 19.8
percent in September 2008, with a sharp increase since March 2008 owing mainly to
external factors (international market prices) as well as internal factors (natural
disasters, a more than 10 percent depreciation in the gourde). This level of inflation,
triggered by a sharp rise in prices, primarily of food, drinks, and tobacco, which
account for more than 50 percent in calculating the consumer price index, exerted great
pressure on the budgets of households, 55 percent of whom already live in extreme
poverty (less than G 40 per person, per day). The inflation rate, which started FY 2008-
2009 with an 18 percent slowdown (the October rate), stood at 10.1 percent in
December 2008. However, an average inflation rate of 9.5 percent for the entire year is
projected if the downward trend in international oil and food prices continues, and
efforts to support agricultural supply are not derailed.
Year-on-Year Inflation (September)
Source: BRH
52 The reduction in the Central Bank policy rate at the start of the fiscal year got credit
flowing again. However, interest rates on the different maturities of Central Bank
bonds during the second six-month period of FY2007-2008 had to be raised gradually
owing to the tension noted on the exchange rate market largely because of the rise in
international prices and internal demand for goods prompted by infrastructure
investments. Consequently, the gourde, which was relatively stable during the first six
months of the fiscal year, depreciated by more than 10 percent during that year. The
BRH average exchange rate (buying), which stood at G 37.29 to US$1 at end-
September 2007, stood at G 38.26 at end-September 2008.
21
Trends in the BRH Average Exchange Rate (Buying)
Source: BRH
53 Fiscal and budgetary policy orientation has made it possible to maintain the level of
public investment, to respond to the food crisis in a various ways, and to address a
number of emergency problems. Despite the negative impact of the slowdown on the
growth in receipts, this policy has been aimed at preserving macroeconomic stability
by controlling the budget deficit and strengthening expenditure execution. The budget
deficit amounted to G 3.7 billion or 1.3 percent of GDP and is entirely funded by
budgetary assistance provided in the form of loans and/or grants, although temporary
funding from the Central Bank made it possible to cover a number of delays in the
disbursement of foreign aid.
54 Tax and customs revenue increased by 16 percent, rising from G 23,197 million in
2006-2007 to G 26,849 million in FY 2007-2008. However, this revenue fell short of
the projection of G 29,900 million contained in the initial budget for the fiscal year,
owing to a temporary subsidy to cover petroleum product prices, estimated at more
than G 2 billion (0.7 percent of GDP) in order to curb social tensions. Actual budgetary
expenses of the Treasury rose from G 26,984 billion in 2006-2007 to G 30,606 billion
in 2007-2008 (a 14 percent increase).
Trends in Total Revenue and Expenditure (as a % of nominal GDP)
Revenue
Expenditure
Source: MEF
55 Public investments are channeled, on a priority basis, toward public works and
activities to support agricultural production. Expenditure on wages have been high,
particularly in the areas of strengthening the justice system, increasing the salaries of
civil servants by an average of 25 percent along with improving distribution by
focusing on low wages, and providing a one-month cash bonus contribution to
facilitate back-to-school needs. Subsidy programs have either been introduced or
strengthened to help households cope with the crisis.
56 Subsidies are provided in many forms: a temporary subsidy on the price of imported
22
rice, a subsidy on the price of energy through transfers to the EDH [Haitian Electricity
company], a subsidy for school cafeterias, for textbooks, for various back-to-school
needs, for seeds and fertilizers for farmers, and for transportation through the purchase
of 300 new buses.
57 The balance of payments deficit has widened, increasing from -0.4 percent of GDP in
2007 to -2.6 percent of GDP in 2008, while the balance of trade deficit grew to
approximately US$353 million, owing to the 22 percent increase in the import of
goods, stemming largely from the rise in oil and food prices on the international
market, and from the importation of public works equipment, while the exports fell by
nine percent, despite implementation of the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through
Partnership Encouragement [HOPE] Act.
58 Private transfers, which had increased gradually in the three preceding years, declined
to 12.5 percent, compared to 14.9 percent in 2006-2007. Although the global balance
of payments has declined, a surplus remains, owing to financial contributions.
Private Unrequited Transfers
Source: BRH
59 BRH net foreign exchange reserves increased in FY 2007-2008. Totaling US$269.1
million in September 2007, these reserves stood at US$288.57 million in September 2008.
During the early months of the first quarter of FY 2008-2009, net foreign exchange
reserves were above US$300 million.
23
Trends in Net Foreign Exchange Reserves (In US$ millions)
Source: BRH
60 The banking sector was not really affected by the financial crisis and posted
satisfactory results. Net profits increased and non-performing loans fell to under 10
percent, although the financial position of two small commercial banks deteriorated
somewhat. An independent evaluation of the three biggest banks in the system
confirmed that their situation was satisfactory, although the main State bank, BNC, had
to be recapitalized after it purchased a failed bank last year.
61 The odds are high that Haiti will encounter problems honoring its foreign debt, based
on a recent debt sustainability analysis conducted by the World Bank and IMF
(February 2009). Its actual debt-to-export ratio is above the projected threshold
(excluding intervention) for a long period in the baseline scenario and increases further
when shocks are simulated. Its weak export base is the main factor explaining this
vulnerability. However, a simulation shows that after the debt relief expected under the
HIPC Initiative, including multilateral debt relief, Haiti’s debt could fall below the
sustainability threshold. The HIPC Initiative completion point had to be postponed
until June 2009. Considerable progress has been made with reforms that have not yet
been completed.
62 Efforts have been made to consolidate the gains made in the area of macroeconomic
stabilization and to strengthen economic governance. The process of strengthening
economic governance, which started in the context of the Program to Support
Economic Governance [Programme d’Appui à la Gouvernance Economique PAGE],
supported by several partners, continued with the implementation of various programs
and agreements such as the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF), the
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, and the Policy Base Grant (PBG).
Institutional strengthening of the central government is continuing with the
implementation of decisions organizing the central government published in September
2005, the civil service law, and the overhaul of the legal framework of a number of
central government institutions.
63 Strengthening public finance is continuing with the streamlining of financial
management and budgeting procedures, improving the public procurement system by
drafting a new law which is pending approval, completing the new Manual of
Procedures for budget preparation, strengthening the accounting system with the
assignment of public accountants to several institutions, thus facilitating better
execution of public expenditure, and bolstering efforts to combat corruption, in
24
particular with the enforcement of the law on the declaration of assets by a number of
political figures and other public officials (February 18, 2008).
64 Public finance rehabilitation is progressing with the oversight of expenditures from
current accounts which were kept at under ten percent of current expenditure, the
reduction of current accounts to one per minister, the streamlining of staff within a
number of public enterprises such as the Haitian Telecommunications Company
[Télécommunications d’Haïti S.A. TELECO] and the National Port Authority [Autorité
Portuaire Nationale APN]. Overhaul of the legal business framework under way and
the strengthening of investment promotion entities are some of the initiatives aimed at
fostering growth and poverty reduction.
Macroeconomic Outlook for 2009-2010
65 Haiti is facing a host of political, economic, and social challenges such as the steady
decline in national production, weak human capital, degradation of its territorial space,
low levels of public security, underperforming institutions, and a limited supply of
public goods and services. Consequently, structured policies and projects need to be
adopted and implemented urgently, financing of which calls for access to additional
resources, which implies stepped up mobilization of national and external resources.
66 Broadly speaking, the growth outlook is modest, with GDP growth projected at 2.5
percent for FY 2008-2009. In fact, the fiscal year will be greatly affected by domestic
and external risk factors carried over from FY 2007-2008. Not all areas of production
will experience improved performance and healthy recovery owing to the shocks that
occurred. Furthermore, despite the current decline in the price of petroleum products on
the international market, uncertainty prevails. The impact of the global recession,
particularly in the United States, and persistently high food prices will play a role in the
slowdown in economic growth in 2008-2009. However, the Government has pledged
to take the steps necessary to ensure achievement of the completion point expected in
June 2009 and to continue with the reforms undertaken, with the aim of improving and
strengthening the financial system, reinforcing the foundation for sustainable growth,
and enhancing competitiveness.
25
Macroeconomic Objectives for 2009-2010
67 In light of the efforts undertaken and actions under way through the post-hurricane
emergency program implemented by the Government, which focuses on humanitarian
needs, infrastructure rehabilitation, and efforts to secure financing to carry out
activities in the context of the GPRSP, the projected growth rate for FY 2008-2009 is
capped at 2.5 percent of real GDP, with an increase in growth in subsequent years until
it reaches the 4.5 percent target set in the GPRSP. The annual inflation rate could reach
5 percent for 2008-2009 and will always remain below 10 percent in subsequent years.
The exchange rate is projected at G 40 [to the dollar] on average. In 2008, tax revenue,
which stood at 10 percent of GDP, is projected to increase to 10.5 percent in 2009 and
gradually climb to approximately 14 percent by 2011.
68 Macroeconomic policy is oriented toward: (i) Promoting sustained growth in the years
ahead, generated by private initiatives targeting job creation while fostering and
strengthening macroeconomic stability and building further the credibility established
in recent years with respect to international partners by providing a predictable
scorecard for the business sector and establishing an environment conducive to foreign
direct investment; (ii) Pursuing and finalizing structural reforms with a view to
enhancing public sector effectiveness, in particular through civil service and public
enterprise reform; (iii) Improving economic governance through the efficient
management of the financial, material, and human resources of the State, in a context
of transparency; and (iv) Strengthening public finances through the combined
improvement of the institutional capacity of the tax and customs administrations,
expansion of the tax base while systematically combating tax evasion, fraud,
corruption, and contraband, strengthening budget procedures, and continuing to
implement public procurement procedures.
69 These reforms are aimed at increasing domestic resources through the implementation
of appropriate fiscal measures and strengthening the capacity of collection entities.
They seek to provide a framework that is conducive to investment and private initiative
and to ensure that taxes and public services are equitable. These additional resources
are necessary to boost investment expenditure, particularly in the area of poverty
reduction.
70 An inflation-targeting monetary policy will be adopted. In this regard, the increase in
base money will be controlled and, with the aim of helping the Haitian economy cope
with shocks, the BRH will maintain a flexible exchange rate system.
71 Structural reforms will revolve around measures that have already been adopted and
should be continued, along with new measures found to be appropriate, in particular
measures that contribute to strengthening financial governance and bolstering
autonomy in the monetary policy sphere.
26
Table No. 2. Selected Macroeconomic Indicators - 2005-2008
2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Annual GDP growth rate in real terms 1.8% 2.5% 3.4% 1.3%
Annual GDP growth rate in nominal terms 19.7% 19.3% 14.5% 22.8%
Inflation rate (annual average) as a % 14.8% 14.2% 8.9% 14.3%
Public savings as a % of GDP 1.3% 0.9% 1.0% 0.1%
Total revenue as a % of GDP 9.6% 9.9% 10.1% 10.0%
Total expenditure as a % of GDP 10.1% 10.7% 11.8% 11.6%
Monetary financing (% of GDP) 0.14 0.49 0.17
Tax ratio 9.67 10.03 10.06 10%
Annual change in the money supply (M3) as a % of GDP 0.5 -9.4 -6.6 -4.2
Annual change in the currency in circulation as a % of GDP 1.4 -11.3 -9.42 -8.3
Annual change in the nominal exchange rate in relation to the
-1.56 6.6 -9.8 2.3
United States dollar (as a %*)
Net foreign exchange reserves (in US$ millions) 70.4 130.2 269.1 288.6
Export of goods and services (US $ millions) 609.8 695.2 781.64 818.31
Import of goods and services (US $ millions) -1,644.8 -2,135.8 -2,318.6 -2,686.4
Current balance of payments (excluding grants) (as a % of GDP) -1.6 -1.4 -0.4 -2.6
Source: Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), Bank of the Republic of Haiti (BRH), and Haitian Institute for
Statistics and Data Processing (IHSI)
27
Chapter III
Social Situation
Trends in Poverty Reduction Expenditure
72 In the context of Paris Club commitments, an automatic public expenditure monitoring
mechanism specifically linked to poverty reduction has been instituted through the
general budget. The choice of areas of intervention was made based on budget
expenditure by function, following the 2001 public finance statistics manual.
73 During FY 2006-2007 and FY 2007-2008, Public Treasury appropriations were
allocated to poverty reduction, according to the various items, taking into account such
major areas as employment, food security, energy supply, transportation, sanitation,
drinking water, health, education, and social protection. These expenditures do not
include external financing of small programs and projects in GPRSP implementation
monitoring. In this regard, a mechanism should be found to remedy this deficiency.
74 In fact, for FY 2006-2007, G 8,868 million was spent out of a total appropriation of
9,860 million, 5,781 million of which went to operating expenses, and 3,088 million, to
investment. For FY 2007-2008, an appropriation of G 15,141 million was allocated to
poverty reduction expenditure and 13,135 million was actually spent, 11,543 million of
which went to operating expenses, and 1,592 million, to investment. This situation
attests to the Government’s desire not only to honor its commitments, but also to take
tangible steps to reduce poverty. The annual comparative analysis showed an increase
in appropriations and expenditures allocated to poverty reduction. The share of
appropriations rose from 31.2 percent to 42.14 percent during the years studied, and for
expenditure commitments, from 30.9 percent to 41.4 percent (see Table No. 3 below).
Expenditures allocated to employment were reduced at the expense of the expenditures
channeled toward health and sanitation, education, transportation and energy, food
security, and social protection. It bears noting that expenditures for education
accounted for over 40 percent, while expenditures for health, sanitation, and social
protection accounted for approximately 24 percent.
28
Table No 3. Execution Status of Government Poverty Reduction Expenditure in
2006-2007 and 2007-2008
(In millions of gourdes)
Total Total
Appropriations Appropriations Expenditures 07-
Expenditures
06-07 07-08 08
06-07
Employment 556.99 552.97 69.40 84.48
Food Security 570.21 445.68 804.58 1,133.27
Energy Supply 9.22 13. 02 2,200.08 1,199.12
Transportation 1,473.10 548.22 2,082.55 713.92
Sanitation 397.35 281.77 454.27 447.79
Equipment and accommodation 500.29 1,524.37 354.95 233.69
Access to drinking water 28.62 11.49 51.45 37.45
Health 1,206.18 1,142.72 1,723.00 1,597.70
Education 4,563.68 4,134.82 6,110.33 5,329.78
Social Protection 554.53 213.21 1,291.03 1,016.53
Total expenditures/poverty 9,860.19 8,868.27 15,141.65 13,134.87
Total
appropriations/expenditures/ 31,671.24 28,656.07 35,925.94 31,755.25
Government
Share of poverty-related
expenditure in relation to total 31.2% 30.94% 42.14% 41.36%
expenditure
Source: Ministry of Economy and Finance
Trends in Poverty and Inequality
75 The most complete version of the Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
(GPRSP) attempts to set forth the public policies to be adopted to lift Haiti out of
chronic monetary poverty. It covers both national and international policies and should
help relieve the abject poverty existing in Haiti, which may worsen owing to the three-
pronged global crisis in the spheres of finance, energy, and food, which is impacting
the volume of unrequited transfers coming from the Haitian Diaspora. Moreover, the
recent natural disasters have taken a very heavy toll on the physical and financial
capital of households that were already in a vulnerable position.
76 According to 1990 statistics, 56.8 percent of Haitians in the country as a whole were
living on less than US$1 per day. There was a slight improvement in this extreme
poverty situation (see Annexes 4 and 5) in 2001, with the rate falling to 54 percent. In
2005, the percentage of the population living in extreme poverty increased by two
percentage points to 56 percent, as shown in Graph 1 below.
29
Graph No. 1: Incidence of Extreme Poverty
Proportion of the population living on less than US$1 (PPP) per day or incidence of extreme
poverty
Sources: FAFO/World Bank.
77 The recent trend observed in relation to MDG 1, namely, to halve the proportion of the
population living on less than US$1 per day between 1990 and 2015 is shown in the
diagram below. It demonstrates that Haiti will not be able to achieve the 28.4 percent
target.
Percentage of the population living 1990: 56.8%
on less than US$1 per day 2003: 56%
2015: 28.4%
Year
78 The poverty index has also changed considerably. In fact, in 2000, the proportion of the
population living on less than US$2 per day (PPP) stood at 65 percent. In 2005, the
proportion of the Haitian population living on less than US$2 per day surged to 76
percent, as demonstrated in Graph No. 2 below.
30
Graph No. 2
Proportion of the population living on less than US$2 (PPP) per day or the incidence of overall poverty
Sources: FAFO/World Bank
79 A comparative analysis of the most recent survey data available (Vanderbilt University
- 2006 and 2008 in Annex No. 6) on the increase in poverty and vulnerability shows
that of a sample of 1,536 persons in the various departments of the country, 14.8
percent, 24.1 percent, 32.1 percent, and 29.1 percent stated that they were very
satisfied, satisfied, not very satisfied, or dissatisfied, respectively, with the standard of
living in 2008.
Gender Men Women Are you satisfied?
(Red) Very satisfied
(Green) Satisfied
(Blue) Not very satisfied
(Fuschia) Dissatisfied
80 However, the share of income of G 3,000 and under increased by approximately 30
31
percent between 2006 and 2008, while income in the range of G 30,000 – G 13,001 fell
by 8 percent. People saved much more in 2006 than in 2008, when over 34 percent of
people considered their income insufficient to satisfy their food needs. This shows that
the situation has deteriorated over a mere two-year period. In 2008, almost 50 percent
of the population surveyed was receiving transfers from abroad, while nearly 29
percent did not receive any in 2006. People depend much more on their families or
friends in 2008 than they did in 2006.
81 Moreover, people spent over 45 percent of their transfer income on consumption and
about 24 percent on education for their children in 2008, as shown in greater detail in
the following table. Young people between 18 and 24 years of age were more likely to
be living with their parents in 2006. The fact that this proportion decreased by 7
percent in 2008 shows that young people have become relatively more independent.
82 In terms of employment, 62 percent claimed to have a job in 2008, compared to about
37 percent who did not, while in 2006, 48 percent were unemployed, compared to 51.2
percent who had a job. Nonetheless, women are much less likely to be employed than
men. Receiving a wage does not create entitlement to employment insurance, however,
although the situation had improved by 2008.
Gender Men Women Employed
(Red) Yes
(Green) No
83 It also remains true that poverty reduction entails measurement of this phenomenon
and analysis of the causes. In 1987, monetary poverty statistics showed that 60 percent
of Haitians lived on less than US$1 per day throughout the country. This situation
improved modestly in 2000, when 48 percent of Haitians lived on less than US$1 per
day. This proportion of the population living in extreme poverty climbed to 55 percent
in 2001, an increase of 7 percentage points. The relative poverty index also changed
considerably. In 1987, the proportion of the population living on less than US$2 (PPP)
stood at 59.6 percent, while in 2001, this percentage stood at 76 percent.
84 Haiti has a high, if not the highest, income disparity in the hemisphere. The Gini index,
a statistical tool that serves as a measure inequality, stood at 0.63 in 2001. Moreover,
32
the depth of extreme poverty during that year in the country as a whole stood at 0.31
percent. However, this indicator masks very high disparities by area of residence – it
stands at 0.37 in rural areas compared to 0.33 and 0.10 in urban areas and in the
Metropolitan area, respectively. (See Annex No. 6)
Depth of Poverty in 2005
Rural area (0.37) Metropolitan area (0.10)
Other urban areas (0.33)
85 Other ways of measuring inequality is the use of quintiles, where the revenue quintile
of the poorest indicates the share of national consumption or revenue going to the
poorest 20 percent of the population and the revenue quintile of the wealthiest indicates
the share going to the wealthiest 20 percent. Based on the survey on living conditions
in Haiti (ECHV), the wealthiest 20 percent of the population holds 69.6 percent of
wealth. At the other end of the spectrum, the poorest 20 percent holds 1.4 percent of
wealth, as shown in the graph below.
Share of the poorest population quintile
relative to the wealthiest quintile
Wealthiest 20 % - 69.6 Poorest 20% - 1.4
Source: ECVH, 2001
86 In 2001, two of the one hundred and thirty-five communes in Haiti (less than 1 percent)
had access to an acceptable level of basic social services. In addition, more than
33
500,000 persons with disabilities are subject to different forms of exclusion. The
monetary poverty situation reveals that the proportion of individuals living in extreme
poverty is increasing at a faster rate than persons living in relative poverty. Also,
income distribution was and still is a source of major concern, given the heightened
inequality of incomes. The tax structure in Haiti is not helpful, inasmuch as it is largely
based on indirect taxes, in particular the turnover tax (TCA), which imposes a greater
burden on low-income households.
Trends in the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs)
87 One of the great challenges posed by the GPRSP is the desire to place Haiti in a
position to overcome the lag with respect to the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs). Thirteen of the fourteen impact monitoring indicators are MDGs. However,
we have good reason to question the possibility of achieving the predefined targets.
88 The available figures show that few of the MDG targets will be achieved by 2015, as
the gaps that remain are too wide. Examples include maternal health, where the trend
has reversed (from progress to regression), and infant mortality, where progress is
rather slow. Other targets are not out of reach, however, provided that suitable
measures are taken in a timely manner; for example, progress, albeit slow, is being
made with the percentage of the population without access to drinking water; and the
trends of school enrollment and literacy rates are reasonable in relation to the targets to
be met. However, net primary school enrollment rates have changed fairly slowly; for
this reason the 2015 target may not be achieved (see the table below showing trends
and projections for 13 of the 48 MDG indicators in Annex No. 7). The literacy rate for
both men and women between the ages of 15 and 24 are taken from PAHO/WHO
estimates for 2000 and from the EMMUS IV survey for 2005-2006.
89 Some targets have already been attained or are about to be, such as the HIV prevalence
rate which is showing a very promising trend (rapid progress), even though Haiti still has
the highest prevalence in the region. Considerable progress has also been made in terms
of the boy/girl ratio in primary and secondary education, which is already at parity.
Table No. 4 below shows the trend of selected MDG indicators and their progress for the
period 1990-2006.
Table No. 4 Values of Selected MDG Indicators (1990-2006)
2005- Targets Gap to be
Indicators 1990 1995 2000 Progress
06 for 2015 bridged
Maternal mortality rate per
100,000 live births 457.0 474.0 520.0 630.0 114.01 regression very large
Proportion of the urban
population with access to an 47.0 43.0 49.0 55.2 94.0 slow large
improved water source (%)
Proportion of children under
26.8 27.5 17.3 22.2 13.4 slow large
weight (%)
Net primary school enrollment
36.4 54.3 49.6 100.0 slow large
rate
34
Literacy rate among 15-24 year
54.8 64.4 82.4 100.0 fast small
olds
Infant-juvenile mortality rate
per 1,000 live births 140.6 137.7 86.0 60.0 slow large
Child mortality rate per 1,000
110.0 87.1 89.4 57.0 36.7 slow large
live births
HIV prevalence rate among the
5.0 5.5 2.2 1.5 fast small
population
Girl/boy ratio in primary
0.9 1.0 1 fast small
education
Source: EMMUS II (1994-95); EMMUS III (2000); EMMUS IV (2005-06); RNPD (2006)
1
The figures in green represent the targets to be achieved by 2015
90 It should be noted that development assistance provided to Haiti through external
agencies is inadequate to meet the GPRSP objectives and is out of step with the
principles of the Paris Declaration. As a result, MDG No. 8, calling for a global
partnership for development, seems far from attainable by Haiti between now and
2015. Considering that the most recent GPRSP Priority Investment Plan cost estimates
for the three years of execution stands at G 172,745,182, 209 or US$4,318,629,555
and that the total appropriations for the first two years of execution stands at G
86,611,119,827 or US$2,165,277,996, then the funding gap to meet GPRSP needs
stands at G 86,611,119,827 or US$2,153,351,560. For the Pillar 1 growth vector, the
financing shortfall is 55 percent, while risks and disasters, which play a major role in
targeted and crosscutting policies and strategies, have naturally assumed greater
importance in this financing component owing to environmental degradation.
Table No. 5 – Estimated Needs, Appropriations, and Additional Financing
To be sought for the GPRSP
Needs indicated 08- Appropriations % by
GPRSP pillars GAP 09/10
10 07/08-08/09 pillar
Pillar I - Growth
90,173,783,656 42,449,471,348 47,724,312,308 55%
vectors
Pillar II: Human
28,983,329,657 17,908,276,205 11,075,053,452 13%
development
Pillar III: Democratic
6,300,663,519 3,309,999,165 2,990,664,354 4%
governance
Targeted and
Crosscutting Policies 47,287,405,377 22,943,373,109 24,344,032,268 28%
and Strategies
Total 172,745,182,209 86,611,119,827 86,134,062,382 100%
35
% 100 51 % 49 %
Chapter IV
Growth and Poverty Reduction
Objectives and the Main
Outcomes
Restatement of the growth and
poverty reduction objectives
91 The long- and medium-term objectives set forth in the GPRSP are, respectively, to lift
Haiti out of the LDC category over the next 15 years and to significantly improve the
population’s living conditions through better governance and the promotion of
decentralized and equitable economic development led by public investment as a
facilitator of private investment. The following four strategic themes are derived from
these medium- and long-term objectives: (i) the promotion of sustainable and pro-poor
economic growth; (ii) increased investment in human capital and improved access to
basic social services; (iii) the protection of vulnerable groups, preservation of the
environment, and management of major risks; and (iv) the strengthening of institutions,
modernization of the State, and the promotion of good governance.
92 Existing public policies have produced significant gains, which include a stable
macroeconomic framework, the reduction in insecurity, and modest but sustained
economic growth over the past four years. However, the country continues to grapple
with four main challenges as it strives to achieve its medium- and long-term vision: (i)
building strong momentum in order to overcome the lag with respect to the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) to move toward more meaningful social development; (ii)
creating a modern, competitive economy with a broad territorial base in order to handle
the rapid modernization of Caribbean economies, which is making it essential for Haiti
to rebalance its competitiveness in a regional context; (iii) modernizing the State in
order to place it, once and for all, at the service of all citizens by calling for a greater
effort to modernize and reshape the public management system; and (iv) making full
use of two big comparative advantages, namely the cultural creativity and historical
heritage of the Haitian people and the accessibility of the diaspora.
93 To remedy this situation, two major phases have been identified to produce sustainable
results to stimulate growth and reduce poverty in Haiti in the coming decades. The first
phase covers 2007 to 2009, the implementation period for the Poverty Reduction and
36
Growth Facility (PRGF), and seeks to strengthen the macroeconomic framework,
modernize agriculture and infrastructure, and promote greater social equity through
education and health. The second phase, covering the 2010–2015 period, focuses on
the search for accelerated, job-creating growth, as well as greater control over social
development.
94 The Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy is based on three priority pillars: (a) the
need to reduce poverty based on four key areas or growth vectors, namely agriculture
and rural development; tourism; infrastructure modernization; and science, technology
and innovation; (ii) human development based on the significant increase in available
opportunities, including social services provided to individuals so that they can better
develop their capacities through education and vocational training; health; and water
and sanitation; (iii) democratic governance, with priority being accorded to the
establishment of the rule of law, especially in the area of justice and security, through
the introduction of an equitable legal order, a functional judicial system, and an overall
climate of security, conditions that are essential to growth and poverty reduction; and
(iv) to these three priority pillars are added targeted and crosscutting policies and
strategies covering food security, assumption of care of persons with disabilities, youth
and sports, gender equity, the environment and sustainable development, risk and
disaster management, intersectoral HIV/AIDS programs, State capacity building, urban
development, territorial development, and culture.
95 These three priority pillars, as well as the crosscutting policies and strategies, are
broken down into 20 overall objectives, 95 specific objectives, and 396 priority lines of
action, which does not include those that were identified in the public finance reform
matrix, and reflect the clear general objective of the GPRSP, which is to roll back
poverty by ensuring the rapid and sustained growth of the Haitian economy in the
coming years, and dampen structural inequalities (see Annex 8).
Main Achievements and Outcomes
96 In order to assess the tangible results of actions undertaken, the methodology entailed
identification of the most significant actions conducted in the areas for which there was
available information on the execution of projects related to the priority lines of action
of the GPRSP. This approach is justified by the fact that, in general, actions
implemented by the Government since the 2007–2008 period covering this report were
identified prior to drafting of the GPRSP and, consequently, do not necessarily meet
the selected eligibility criteria, and have generally not yet been subject to impact
assessments. Maps indicating the location of interventions help identify the results in
the main sectors.
97 Project financing which was, to some degree, synchronized with GRPSP pillars and
objectives accounted for 82 percent of total Public Investment Program (PIP)
appropriations for FY 2007–2008, and for 87 percent of total PIP appropriations for FY
2008–2009, although they were identified and prepared prior to the drafting of the
GPRSP. Moreover, appropriations to the projects consistent with the pillars of the
GPRSP account for 13 percent and 87 percent of national resources and external
resources, respectively, for FY 2007–2008, whereas they account for 12 percent and 88
percent, respectively, of these resources for FY 2008–2009 underway. Table No. 6
37
below shows the trends in appropriations for the two fiscal years under consideration.
Table No. 6- DISTRIBUTION OF CAPITAL INVESTMENT APPROPRIATION ACCORDING TO GPRSP PILLAR
FY 2007–2008 FY 2008–2009
NR ER TOTAL NR ER TOTAL
PILLAR 1 -
GROWTH 2,006,478,342 19,543,440,302 21,549,918,644 2,811,507,455 16,859,184,383 19,670,691,838
VECTORS
PILLAR II :
HUMAN 382,366,235 1,003,385,630 1,385,751,865 9,000,000 1,646,711,216 1,655,711,216
DEVELOPMENT
PILLAR III :
DEMOCRATIC 250,313,551 6,382,413,016 6,632,726,567 175,250,000 10,913,639,458 11,088,889,458
GOVERNANCE
TARGETED AND
CROSSCUTTING
2,536,574,474 8,506,455,478 11,043,029,952 1,632,067,469 5,257,484,768 6,889,552,237
POLICIES AND
STRATEGIES
PIP
APPROPRIATIONS
5,175,732,602 35,435,694,426 40,611,427,028 4,627,824,924 34,677,019,825 39,304,844,749
TO THE GPRSP
PILLARS
NR/TD 13% 12%
ER/TD 87% 88%
TOTAL PIP
6,264,533,001 42,969,740,187 49,234,273,188 6,188,941,490 38,842,506,970 45,031,484,600
APPROPRIATIONS
GPRSP/PIP Projects
82% 87%
OVERALL
38
98 Pillar 1. Growth Vectors Sectors
98. 1. Agriculture and Rural Development
Priority Actions Achievements for FY 2007–2008
Improved land management and watershed Three watersheds upgraded: Lamatry Jassa, Rivière Marion, and
protection Rivière Canot
Support and subsidy provided for the production of bamboo in
Marmelade, Jacmel, and Cayes-Jacmel on 2,000 hectares
Stimulation of agricultural production Support and subsidy provided for the revitalization of agricultural
production, including coffee and fruits in Marmelade; food crops in
Bas Plateau Central; and sweet potatoes, fruits, and vegetables in
Jacmel and Cayes-Jacmel on 4,000 hectares
1,350,000 coffee seedlings produced and distributed in the coffee-
growing areas in the départements of Nord, Nord-Est, Centre, and
Grande-Anse
1,500 hectares of coffee plantations involved in combating the
coffee cherry borer
Three coffee cherry washing centers rehabilitated in Thiotte,
Dondon, and Baptiste
Four equipped coffee-tasting laboratories established in Thiotte,
Dondon, Baptiste, and at the Faculty of Agronomy.
Protection against the mango fruit fly provided
Rehabilitation and improvement of the major Three irrigation systems rehabilitated: Maribaroux, Castel, and La
existing irrigation systems in order to facilitate the Tannerie in Grande Rivière du Nord, Petite Rivière, and Torbeck,
maximum tapping of their potential respectively, for the irrigation of 3,000 hectares
98.2. Infrastructure: Roads and Electricity
Priority Actions Achievements for FY 2007–2008
Poverty reduction actions: Roads in Port-au-Prince renovated with the expansion of sidewalks
Rehabilitation of urban and rural roads and
drinking water supply systems
Rehabilitation and maintenance of roads to 504 kilometers of roads and segments of connecting roads linking
support agriculture and tourism isolated towns rehabilitated and maintained to support agriculture
and tourism
Rehabilitation of national roads Studies launched on the rehabilitation or construction of new road
segments covering a total of 370 kilometers
Rehabilitation of airports Airports in Port-au-Prince, Cap-Haitien, and Jacmel rehabilitated
and modernized
Regional integration with the Dominican 75 kilometers of the Cap-Ouanaminthe road constructed
Republic through the development of the road
network
30 sets of traffic lights installed in Port-au-Prince, St-Marc, and
other provincial cities
350 trash receptacles installed in Port-au-Prince
Increase in existing capacity through an Three thermal power plants in Port-au-Prince, Cap-Haitien, and
equipment purchase strategy that minimizes the Gonaïves, each with a capacity of 30 Mgw for a total of 90 Mgw,
burden of the oil bill constructed and brought into service.
39
99 Pillar II. Human Development Sectors
99.1. Education and Vocational Training
Priority Actions Achievements for FY 2007–2008
Creation and outfitting of new seated spaces in
14 new classrooms constructed and 34 others rebuilt
primary school
149 classrooms furnished
101 classrooms rehabilitated
Launch of a literacy training program for the 19-
2,421 literacy centers established
30 and 31-55 age groups
Continuation of the process of introducing 5 EFACAPs in Kenscoff, Thomazeau, Bonneau, Butete, Meyer,
EFACAPs, increasing their number by 35 in 2008 and Ouanaminthe constructed and equipped. Of a total of 17
planned EFACAPs, 10 have been in operation since January across
the country.
210 local management committees established in the 10 EFACAP
networks
Continuing training of teachers and school 1,930 education officers trained
principals
Teaching contracts implemented and finalized in 210 schools
Transformation of the school inspection offices
(BDSs) into units for the coordination and
10 new BDSs constructed, upgraded, and brought into service
management of education and training at the
school district level
10 new BDSs under construction
200 school inspection and zonal offices equipped
Public financing mechanism to help poor families The program is underway and over 35,000 children are benefiting
pay private school fees for the education of from it.
50,000 children not enrolled in primary school
40
99.2. Health
Priority Actions Achievements for FY 2007–2008
Rehabilitation of the departmental referral 5 hospitals (Cap-Haitien, Trou du Nord, Ouanaminthe, Jérémie, and
hospitals Cayes) rehabilitated
Rehabilitation and construction of health 5 five health centers (Acul du Nord, Ile Cayemite, Port-à-Piment,
centers with beds Marbial, and Grand Boucan) constructed and upgraded
Equipment and materials provided to 11 new health centers
Assumption of care for STIs/HIV, 1,365 HIV-positive pregnant women received ARV prophylaxis,
tuberculosis, malaria/filariasis and zoonosis accounting for 27 percent for FY 2007–2008. The goal of 10-15 percent
was easily met.
10 percent improvement between 2005 and 2008 in the immunization
coverage for BCG and DTP
Assumption of care Increase from 24 percent in 2006 to 30 percent in 2008 in the
percentage of women giving birth with assistance from medical
personnel
Increase by at least 10 percentage 98 percent coverage for measles during the elimination campaign
points of immunization rates for that began in
2007. Expanded vaccination program supported by the available
comparative table for immunization coverage during 2006–2007
DPT3,
BCG, and measles for 2005–2008
The Government approved the national policy, the strategic plan,
Approval by the Government
and an integrated operational plan.
of a national policy, a strategic plan,
and an operational plan for HIV/AIDS
prevention and treatment
41
100 Pillar III. Democratic Governance Sectors
100.1. Justice and Public Security
Priority Actions Achievements for FY 2007–2008
Reform and restructuring of civil status services 800,000 new national identification cards issued
Reorganization of the Ministry The Supreme Judicial Council [Conseil Supérieur de la
Magistrature] and the Supreme Council of the Judicial Branch
[Conseil Supérieur du Pouvoir Judiciaire] established
The Legal Service Training College [Ecole de la Magistrature]
Establishment of the EMA Board of Directors
reopened
Protection of human rights 1,500 persons released from custody
Crime prevention 3,000 young people benefited from the Disarmament,
Demobilization, and Reintegration Program
Improvement of police infrastructure 20 police stations rehabilitated/constructed;120 police vehicles
equipped
100.2. Local Governance
Priority Actions Achievements for FY 2007–2008
Strengthening of the delegations for the 9 administrative complexes under construction in 9 departmental
départements and the arrondissements administrative centers
Gradual improvement in governance in the
5 city halls constructed for municipal government offices
communes and support to the municipal councils
15 offices constructed for the local government councils [Conseils
d’Administration des Sections Communales CASECs]
In 19 communes, survey initiated of properties constructed through
awareness building among/mobilization of the population,
acquisition of materials, and training of all surveyors (1,041) and
supervisors (149) involved in data collection and the launch of the
process
10 training seminars organized for mayors
145 administrative support personnel recruited to oversee
commune-level administrations
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
101 The Crosscutting Sectors
101.1. Food Security
A national food security plan was prepared. Efforts were undertaken to improve the
nutritional status of the most vulnerable groups (pregnant women, children), with the
execution of 17 projects financed by the Economic and Social Assistance Fund (FAES) under
the Local Development Program (PDL). These projects provided food support to women
and children, coverage of acute malnutrition, and the improvement of the nutritional status
of children and parents.
101.2. Social Protection and Persons with Special Needs
Particular attention was accorded to persons with special needs, who are perceived by many
as outcasts. To this end, the following actions aimed at reducing exclusion and enhancing
social protection were taken: the appointment of a minister responsible for the integration of
disabled persons; and the integration of over 100 persons with special needs into public
administration.
101.3. Youth, Sports, and Civic Actions
Actions carried out in the Youth, Sports, and Civic Actions sector for 2007–2008 facilitated
the participation of over 21,000 school children from 500 academic institutions in school
games competitions, and enabled 40 school children to receive financial assistance for sport-
étude (joint academic and sports program) and 1,000 young community activists [Agents
Multiplicateurs de Changements]* to take part in post-disaster, rescue, and school safety
activities, under the civic action program of the Ministry of Youth, Sports, and Civic Action.
101.4. Gender Equity
With a view to reducing gender inequality, especially with respect to the economy,
education, health, and politics, which is characterized by income disparity (US$1,250
compared to US$2,247 among men), the adult literacy rate (50 percent among women
compared to 53.8 percent among men), the percentage of women holding positions in the
Government (25 percent) and in Parliament (3.6 percent and 25.9 percent in the Lower
House and Senate, respectively), emphasis was placed in 2007–2008 on the overall
improvement of conditions for women. Actions undertaken consisted of the execution of
poverty alleviation sectoral projects, including the support project for the provision of
funding to families in dire straits through the introduction of small modern henhouses; the
provision to women’s organizations or groups (3,000 female members from 10 organizations
or associations) in the départements of Ouest, Sud, Plateau Central, Artibonite, and Grande-
Anse of livestock (young goats, pigs, cattle) and agricultural equipment (plowing tools, mills,
pumps, inputs); awareness-building and education campaigns on women’s rights; the
*
The Agents multiplicateurs de changements are trained to provide a range of services to communities in areas
such as health, literacy, safety, and the provision of first aid in the event of disasters.
49
commemoration of November 25, 2007; education and awareness building regarding
nonsexist behavior; the commemoration of March 8, 2008; the commemoration of the
national women’s movement day on April 3, 2008; and awareness-building campaigns
during the 2008 carnival period.
101.5. Environment and Sustainable Development
The damage caused by the natural disasters that hit the country during the summer of 2008 laid
bare the level of environmental degradation and the degree of vulnerability of the entire territory.
During the 2007–2008 period, several environmental activities were conducted, including flood
protection by managing and protecting ravines, protection of the National Torbeck School [Ecole
Nationale de Torbeck] against swelling of the river, deviation of the Grègues river to protect the
city of Saint-Jean du Sud, the rehabilitation of the Artibonite River watershed; flood prevention
in five communes, flood protection for the city of Jacmel, the rehabilitation and conservation of
natural sites, namely Saut Mathurine, Saut d’Eau, Forets-des-Pins, Parc la Visite, and Bassin
Bleu, and the restructuring and protection of ecosystems in Morne l’Hôpital.
101.6. Disaster and Risk Reduction
Disaster and risk management-related actions carried out during the 2007–2008 period sought to
build the intervention capacity of the Civil Protection Directorate (DPC) and the Risk and
Disaster Prevention and Management System (SPGRD). Programs and projects undertaken
include the emergency risk and disaster management program, which allowed for improved
coordination and distribution of emergency aid to the populations affected by the hurricanes;
rehabilitation and risk management in the regions affected by recent floods; local risk
management (Ouest, Artibonite, Nippes, Sud, Grand’Anse); and local capacity building for risk
management in Haiti (Sud’ Est, Nord’ Ouest, Nord’ Est, Centre).
101.7. Multisectoral HIV/AIDS Programs
As a result of actions taken to combat HIV/AIDS, 1,365 HIV-positive pregnant women received
ARV prophylaxis, which accounted for 27 percent for the 2007–2008 period, thus easily meeting
the goal of 10–15 percent.
101.8. State Capacity Building
Haiti’s public administration has failed to adequately perform its public service role. With a view
to improving the institutional framework for State reform, the following actions were undertaken:
the establishment of the Higher Council for Government and Civil Service [Conseil Supérieur de
l’Administration et de la Fonction Publique CSAFP], which has responsibility for the strategic
management of the modernization of the public service and the civil service; the establishment of
the Human Resource Management Office (OMRH), which is tasked with the operational
management of reform activities; and the development and adoption by the Government of the
2007–2012 Framework Program on State Reform and Decentralization, which is the frame of
reference for all interventions pertaining to modernization of the State.
50
101.9. Territorial Development
With regard to local governance and territorial development, actions to strengthen the
participatory process were undertaken in the départements of Sudest, Sud, and Nippes.
Achievements include the preparation and publication of 3,109 teaching kits; the broadcast of 11
radio programs including one documentary on the participatory process, conflict prevention and
management, gender and development, the organizational management of development
committees, environmental management, and citizen education; the organization of training
workshops on participatory planning and local development in which over 14,500 persons
participated; the preparation of five commune-level assessments and five commune-level
development plans; and the assessment of 30 community-based organizations (CBOs).
101.10. Culture and Communication
Under the restoration and preservation project for the national historic park, the Citadelle, Sans
Souci, and les Ramiers, the following activities were carried out during FY 2007–2008:
construction of fencing; strengthening and completion of sanitary facilities; construction of access
roads; and the repair of the roof of the Batterie Royale. The fortifications at Marchand also
benefited from interventions, which entailed the construction of paths leading to the forts; similar
work was carried out at Fort Picolet.
51
52
53
54
Chapter V
Monitoring and Evaluation
102 This mechanism, which is described in Annex 2, is based on two main aims: (i)
monitoring of the GPRSP, which entails the determination of the extent to which the
stipulated actions and policies are being implemented as planned, with a view to
making necessary modifications if required; and (ii) evaluation of the GPRSP aimed at
identifying the effects and impact of the implemented actions and policies on the
beneficiaries and actors and on the Haitian population as a whole.
103 The monitoring-evaluation framework for the GPRSP put in place includes the
following components: (i) the monitoring of poverty and the living conditions of poor
households; (ii) the monitoring of the execution of the policies, programs, and projects
of the GPRSP; and (iii) the impact assessment of the GPRSP.
Quantitative Monitoring
104 Quantitative monitoring is conducted by the National Observatory on Poverty and
Social Exclusion [Observatoire National de la Pauvreté et de l’Exclusion Sociale
ONPES] in collaboration with the Economic and Social Programming Directorate
[Direction de Programmation Economique et Sociale DPES] of the Ministry of
Planning and External Cooperation (MPCE). The quantitative approach is based on a
set of indicators distributed along the thematic areas of economic growth and poverty
reduction. These indicators are constructed with a view to measuring the
1 2
results/effects of development (87 indicators) based on the resources provided (16
3 4
indicators), and products or activities generated (40 indicators); the expected impact
in terms of economic growth and improvement in household living conditions is
measured by 14 indicators. The frequency with which all of these indicators are
observed varies between one and five years.
1. These indicators cover access to services, their use, and the degree of satisfaction of the beneficiaries.
2. Resource indicators are fiscal in nature and allow for an assessment of the level of resources pumped into the economy.
3. The product indicators assess the execution of projects/programs/public policies through their inputs and outputs.
4. Impact indicators measure the key dimensions of the well-being of the population, and of the poor in particular. They help
assess improvement in the living conditions of the population through the implementation of the GPRSP.
55
105 The construction of the 157 monitoring/evaluation indicators of the GPRSP takes into
account the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) while integrating the specific
aspects of poverty in Haiti and, in particular, the objectives of the GPRSP. Several
presentations on these indicators were made to policy makers and donors. This series
of indicators was approved by the various priority sectors considered in the GPRSP and
by MPCE authorities. Information for these indicators is provided at three levels: (i)
the availability of data (statistics) from specific surveys conducted by the main data
producers, including the Haitian Institute for Statistics and Data Processing (IHSI) and
a number of international organizations. Given that the IHSI is the sole national
institution authorized to produce data, a Memorandum of Understanding with the
MPCE/ONPES is currently being approved, thus allowing for the incorporation of the
specific statistical needs of the ONPES with respect to monitoring the GPRSP; (ii) a
mechanism was also established with a view to collecting data via the various
departmental directorates located across the national territory, which must be used
primarily to provide information for the product indicators; and (iii) with a view to
complementing the aforementioned collection methods, the ONPES plans to organize
surveys and field visits to enable it to gather information on specific thematic areas.
106 Quantitative monitoring is therefore structured with a view to providing opinions on,
inter alia, the living conditions of Haitians, the MDG situation, and the effectiveness of
State budgetary resources. This latter dimension is significant, because it is closely
related to another notion— the utility of these allocations. The utility and effectiveness
of budgetary allocations as well as those from external agencies are measured on the
basis of their alignment with the following 12 strategic objectives: (i)strong and
sustainable economic growth; (ii) an increase in tax revenues to contain the public
administration’s overall deficit within reasonable limits; and (iii) a realistic budget that
reflects the priorities defined in the GPRSP, namely: (i) the improvement of
environmental management with a view to contributing to sustainable growth while
ensuring the economic and social security of the poor and the security of the
ecosystems; (ii) the provision to the country of growth support infrastructure that is
well managed, maintained, and functional; (iii) the accessibility, functionality, and
equitable distribution of basic socioeconomic infrastructure; (iv) the improvement in
the quality and effectiveness of teaching; (v) the organization of access to schools for
poor students; (vi) the promotion of a modern health system that is largely accessible to
vulnerable groups; (vii) the consolidation of the rule of law through justice that is
accessible, credible, efficient, and competent; (viii) the expansion of the National
Police to the entire territory and improved performance; and (ix) the efficiency of
justice and improvement of incarceration conditions and penitentiary management
mechanisms.
107 The provision of information (data) for the indicators continues to pose a major
challenge to monitoring of the GPRSP. At present, only the resource indicators can be
assessed in relation to the objectives being pursued under the GPRSP. The other
indicator typologies (effects and impact in particular) are affected by drawbacks
pertaining to the age of the data. These data must be updated. Moreover, providing
support to the logical results framework is difficult at this time in the sense that the
resources allocated for development actions are not clearly linked to the outputs
achieved, which in turn are not linked to the effects. The indicators are thus, for the
time being, viewed as observations and the linkages between them are not discussed.
56
Participatory Qualitative Monitoring
108 Traditional quantitative approach mechanisms are used to monitor implementation of
the GPRSP. Implementation entails the execution of a series of actions (programs and
projects) across the country. However, the participatory nature of this national
development document introduces a new type of monitoring—citizen monitoring
(qualitative approach). This initiative is carried out in line with the dynamic
participatory process, which was central to the drafting of the GPRSP. This
Participatory Qualitative Monitoring (PQM) process is being put in place in order to
take into account the views of the citizens for whom GPRSP actions have been carried
out (see Annex 9). This process entails highlighting the degree of satisfaction of the
populations with all of the actions executed in their living and working environment in
relation to living conditions. Under this approach, qualitative data will therefore be
linked to quantitative data. In this context, two observations can be made:
109 The PQM presents a picture of the prevailing situation in the environment where the
actions stipulated in the GPRSP are being executed. This allows the beneficiary
communities to ascertain whether or not the activities are facilitating progress as
intended, especially in terms of the sustainable improvement of their means of
existence, and to quickly call upon the decision-making bodies to make the necessary
adjustments. Participatory monitoring focuses on the populations and in particular on
the poorest. The beneficiaries must be involved in the monitoring process and the
poorest populations must be at the heart of the process. Participation means that the
partners and beneficiaries are involved in the collection and analysis of information and
the conduct of assessments to determine whether or not any progress has been made in
relation to the set objectives and planned activities.
110 All community stakeholders participate in citizen monitoring: beneficiary populations,
elected local officials, civil society, NGOs, and the private sector. These actors are
members of departmental and commune-level entities such as the Departmental
Consultation Table [Table Départementale de Concertation TDC] and the Commune-
Level Consultation Table [Table Communale de Concertation TCC]. Within these
entities, the Community Groups and Associations (CGAs) discuss and assess actions
undertaken. It is against this backdrop that the ONPES/MPCE obtains and collects
qualitative data through the use of questionnaires and assessment grids. A series of
activities has been put in place to make the participatory qualitative monitoring process
more effective. These activities are as follows: (i) All grassroots associations (CGAs)
involved in the GPRSP monitoring process were registered; (ii) External events to
promote participation in the TDCs were organized; (iii) An assessment of the
community associations’ capacity to effectively fulfill their role of citizen monitor was
conducted; (iv) The CGAs will receive training (guidance) in the area of governance
and management of associations; (v) Technical support officers were assigned to the
departmental directorates and will be responsible for, inter alia, supervising citizen
monitoring in the regions.
57
111 A new landscape is emerging in the monitoring process with the establishment of a
5
monitoring space known as the flagship commune [Commune Phare]. This approach
facilitates looking beyond the results of one project in order to have a global picture of
the projects that are most likely to produce sustainable changes. Building on the
foundation of the flagship commune is another observation tool, namely the flagship
project (a promising project). The latter steers the flagship commune because it
provides opportunities in the area of economic growth and human development (via the
MDGs). The flagship project therefore becomes the core component of the monitoring
space, which is the flagship commune.
112 The ‘engine’ of this type of monitoring process is set in motion through the actors and
partners, the methodological tools, the support entities, and the institutional entities,
and the trajectory of the information sought (citizens’ views) is well established.
However, much remains to be done to address the difficulties encountered (dearth of
resources, lack of coordination, misunderstandings, and the complexity of the
qualitative data collection process). The removal of these impediments will give way to
a more effective citizen monitoring process.
Communication and Outreach
113 The GPRSP is the result of a broad national consensus reached through the
participatory process. The consultation and participation phases were largely respected
through the commune-level and departmental forums and the national forum. However,
consideration of citizen participation does not end there as it is a long-term activity.
Under this approach, ownership of the GPRSP by the populations requires ongoing
knowledge of what is being done and executed on their behalf. This approach is being
adopted through a communication plan that seeks to promote outreach/increased
ownership among the citizens and especially the beneficiaries, who must get involved
in order to observe, monitor, and express opinions on the implementation of the
GPRSP. This plan is broken down into the following activities: (i) A version of the
GPRSP is being produced in the local vernacular (Haitian Creole, for maximum
outreach); (ii) A simplified version is being prepared in French and Creole in the form
of brochures and leaflets entitled “GPRSP Bulletins” for greater ownership of the
document and implementation; (iii) A promotional campaign in the national and local
media is in place; (iv) Regional and departmental tours have been organized as joint
seminars/conferences; (v) Conferences/seminars have been organized for academia,
trade unions, associations, and business and other sectors; (vi) Promotional
advertisements on the GPRSP are being broadcast on TV and radio stations; and (vii)
Explanatory brochures have been printed and disseminated (see Annex 10).
5 Commune benefiting from a large number of projects and possessing a significant population gradient. There are a total of 44
flagship communes.
114 However, the weight of current events (food crisis, oil crisis, and even the American
presidential elections), given their sheer magnitude, is having an impact on the
effectiveness of the outreach campaign being conducted for the GPRSP.
58
Chapter VI
Status of Completion Point
Triggers
115 Haiti is facing major challenges owing to the commitments made and agreements
signed with international partners in the area of reform. In fact, Haiti made a
commitment to undertake a series of reforms in the context of Poverty Reduction and
Growth Facility (PRGF) programs, the completion point triggers for the Heavily
Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, and the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs). The planned reforms are the main factors that would enable the country to
benefit from debt relief. Consequently, measures have been adopted to meet the
commitments made with a view to achieving the targeted objectives and thus build
strong momentum for a modern economy at the service of its citizens.
116 Having reached the decision point in October 2006, which enabled Haiti to benefit
from interim debt relief vis-à-vis its debtors, the country implemented a large number
of reforms aimed at receiving debt relief at the completion point in June 2009, in
addition to allocating greater resources to poverty reduction.
117 In this regard, the first trigger was the participatory approach to the Growth and
Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP) and its implementation, accompanied by a
macroeconomic stabilization policy, the main aggregates of which have achieved
satisfactory developments during the program’s three-year period. Significant
structural and social reforms have also been undertaken, including in the areas of
economic governance, public finance, and debt management.
Public Finance and Economic
Governance Reforms
118 With respect to public finance, a public expenditure monitoring mechanism was put in
place in connection with poverty reduction efforts based on the functional classification
of public expenditure at the Directorate General of the Budget. Annual reports for FY
2006–2007 and FY 2007–2008 were prepared, thus resulting in the actual alignment of
priority public expenditure with the GPRSP.
119 The Government’s accounts were submitted for auditing to the CSCCA and Parliament
in accordance with a legally mandated timetable, and the Court transmitted its
comments to the MEF. The draft budget execution laws for 2005–2006 and 2006–2007
were submitted to Parliament. With respect to the adoption and implementation of a
59
new procurement law, in keeping with best international practices, the draft law was
finalized and submitted to the Prime Minister’s Office for presentation to Parliament.
120 The adoption of a law on the declaration of goods and the submission of at least one
annual report on compliance with and monitoring of asset declarations covering the
preceding year was voted on by Parliament and is in force. The registers, asset
declaration forms, and the list of declarations are currently being prepared.
Structural Reforms
121 Particular attention was paid to strengthening the tax administration and policy, with
the improvement in the operation of customs control posts in Cap-Haitien, Gonaïves,
Saint Marc, Miragoane, Malpasse, Ouanaminthe, and Belladère, as well as the
installation of ASYCUDA. New customs control posts were set up in Ganthier, Morne-
à-Cabrit, and Terrier Rouge. The ASYCUDA World model has been installed at the
Toussaint L’Ouverture international airport and at the ports in Port-au-Prince and
Saint-Marc. The Société Générale de Surveillance (SGS) is responsible for the
enforcement of these customs controls in the provincial towns where customs
documents are required.
122 The expansion of the use of the central taxpayer database in the Port-au-Prince area, as
well as the registration in this database of all the taxpayers identified at the tax centers
in Cayes, Miragoane, Saint-Marc, Port-de-Paix, Cap-Haitien, and Fort-Liberté, were
carried out. The central taxpayer database is applicable to four major taxes in the
provincial cities, namely the taxpayer number, vehicle registration, driver’s licenses,
and registration cards. The software supporting the central database has been installed
in Carrefour and the system is interconnected with the Central Office. In Pétion-Ville,
the database is being set up for incorporation into the new computer system supporting
the central file so as to facilitate daily operations on the old system. The taxpayer
database in the departmental directorates of Cayes, Cap-Haitien, Jacmel, Saint-Marc,
Miragoane, Gonaïves, Hinche, and Fort Liberté Jérémie, is operational.
Education
123 In the area of education, the school fee subsidy program was launched in 2007 under
the Education For All (EFA) program, covering close to 56,823 children in eight
départements, thereby meeting the set target of 50,000 children. This public financing
seeks to help poor families pay private school costs for the education of children not
enrolled in primary school. The independent audit of schools receiving public transfers
was completed for FY 2007–2008.
124 Actual expenditure on education is projected to account for at least 21 percent of total
actual recurrent expenditure by the State, of which 50 percent was for primary
education during the 12 months preceding the completion point, thus facilitating the
training of 2,500 new primary school teachers and, on average, two annual visits by
MENFP inspectors to all primary schools.
125 For FY 2006–2007, operating expenditure for the education sector accounted for 19.4
percent of the entire operating budget. The operating budget for FY2007–2008
allocated 20.3 percent to education, of which 38 percent was for primary education.
60
The analysis of the budgetary headings shows that expenditure during the first six years
of basic education (primary) accounted for 51 percent of all MENFP expenditure for
FY 2006–2007 and for 50 percent for FY 2007–2008.
126 The accelerated initial training program was launched, and 2,750 secondary school
graduates are pursuing this program in order to qualify as teachers. They will complete
their first year of training in June 2009. The results of the inspections are not yet
available. DDE reports are currently at the MENFP and are awaiting processing. The
number of inspectors jumped from 300 to 600. A total of 300 new inspectors were
trained and deployed to all 10 Departmental Directorates for Education (DDEs).
Health
127 During the immunization campaign conducted in 2007, coverage rates were,
respectively, 98 percent for measles and rubella, 68 percent for DTP, and 70 percent
for BCG. Between 2006 and 2008, hospital birth rates increased by 26 percent. Among
HIV-positive pregnant women, 1,365 women (27 percent) received ARV prophylaxis,
whereas the goal was between and 10 and 15 percent, and 141,595 pregnant women
were tested for HIV during FY 2007–2008 according to the MSPP’s “Summary on the
HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Haiti” [Point sur l’épidémie du VIH/SIDA en Haïti]. Moreover,
at end-2007, the Government approved a national policy, a strategic plan, and an
operational plan for expansion of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment services.
Debt Management
128 The contract to centralize all information on foreign currency external and domestic
debt in one single database was signed between the Ministry of Economy and Finance
(MEF) and UNCTAD. Debt management training began in February 2009.
61
Conclusion
129 The Republic of Haiti is cognizant of the sustained efforts that it must continue to make
in order to operationalize the first tranche of its National Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy in the context of the Millennium Development Goals, by
maintaining the goal of reducing extreme poverty by 29 percent, which is far short of
the set target of 50 percent by 2015.
130 The Haitian authorities have satisfactorily honored their commitments through the
implementation of a series of reforms for which quantitative and qualitative criteria
were established and which signal major progress. This is evidenced by the results
obtained from these reforms that help demonstrate that Haiti has made significant
strides toward achievement of the Completion Point under the Heavily Indebted Poor
Countries (HIPC) Initiative, supported by the Growth and Poverty Reduction Facility
(GPRF).
131 Indeed, the first trigger was the participatory approach to the Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP) and its implementation, accompanied by a
macroeconomic stabilization policy, the main aggregates of which made satisfactory
progress during the program’s three-year period. Substantial structural and social
reforms were also undertaken, including in the area of economic governance, public
finance, and debt management.
132 However, implementation of the strategy was severely affected by two factors—on one
hand, programs and projects being executed had to proceed with implementation on
the basis of financial commitments made prior to the participatory identification of
priority actions selected during drafting of the GPRSP and, on the other hand, the
impact of the increase in food and oil prices as well as the disasters triggered by four
hurricanes in less than two months in 2008, the cost of which was estimated at 14.6
percent of national GDP.
133 Indeed, development aid provided to Haiti was not completely in line with the
objectives of the GPRSP and was inconsistent with the principles of the Paris
Declaration. Consequently, the eighth MDG outlining a global partnership for
development is likely to fall far short of achieving its target for Haiti by 2015.
134 Thus, when the first projected costs for implementation of the GPRSP for the 2007–
2010 period amounting to approximately US$3.8 billion are taken into account and
when the known commitments of partners are withdrawn (approximately US$1.9
billion), there will be a financing gap of US$1.9 billion, which is unevenly distributed
among the GPRPS pillars. Thus, while Pillar 1 (growth vectors) requires US$2.1
billion, only 28 percent of this sum has been pledged in commitments by the partners,
which is far too inadequate. Pillar 3 (justice and security) requires US$ 285 million, of
62
which 33.1 percent has been pledged in commitments, which is far too low.
135 Now that the Priority Investment Plan for the GPRSP at an estimated cost of US$
4,318,629,555 has been prepared and appropriations for the first two years of
implementation stand at US$ 2,165,277,996 (51 percent), the financing required to
supplement expressed needs amounts to US$ 2,153,351,650, which represents 49
percent of the estimated cost of the GPRSP.
136 The commitment guaranteeing the shift from the financing of programs and projects to
budget support in Haiti is expected to materialize when the country achieves the
completion point, which should help steer investments toward the most disadvantaged
populations living on less than US$1 per day.
137 This first annual report on implementation of Haiti’s GPRSP must be assessed in its
context and in light of the numerous constraints encountered during its extremely short
duration in order to measure the initial results and impact. The prospects identified
should convince our partners that the Government of Haiti and the Haitian population
as a whole remain committed to “making the qualitative leap” toward the desired
sustainable development, which will be achieved with the effort, resolve, and courage
of citizens based on the principle of mutual cooperation.
Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation (MPCE)
25, Rue Mgr Guilloux, Palais des Ministères Tel: 223-8921
Port-au-Prince, HAITI
Website: http://www.mpce.gouv.ht • e-mail: info@mpce.gouv.ht
63
ANNEXES
Annex 1
COMPARATIVE TABLE REVIEWING THE MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
Major Aggregates Context of Preparation Initial document Adjustments
Rate of growth of Activity slowdown between 2000 and 2004 - 2007-2009, growth rate set at 3.5% on average per year. Growth targets were adjusted in 2007-
real GDP (1.0%, - 0.3%, 0.4%) 2008
2006-2007, estimates of 3%
Very steep fall in 2003/2004 (- 3.5%) For 2007-2008: 2.5% then 1.5%
For 2007-2008, projections are 3.7%.
The trend reversed from 2005 onwards, with Preliminary results: 1.3%
a slight rise of 1.8% An average annual growth rate of 4% is expected for
subsequent years. For 2008/09: 2.5%
Trend maintained in 2006 and 2007
For 2009/10: 4%
For 2006 (2.3%)
For 2007 (3.2%)
Inflation Prices have also varied sharply The inflation rate expected for 2007 is 8%. A rate of 9.5% is expected for 2008-
2009,
The inflation rate in 2004 represented an The target for 2008-2009 is 7%.
year-on-year drop of 21.69%. In 2005, the and staying below 10% for 2009-2010.
rate was 14.8%, and in late 2006/2007 An even lower rate is expected in 2011.
around 10%.
Inflation at end-March 2008 was around
16% owing to domestic and external shocks;
it ended the year at 19.8%. It started 2008-
2009 at 18%.
Exchange rate The exchange rate moved upwards Exchange rate around 40 gourdes per US$1 In 2008/2009, the rate is expected to be
periodically (contractions and overheating) around 41 gourdes.
fluctuating around 35, 37, 40 gourdes per
US$1 between 2006 and 2008. In the first quarter of 2009 it was stable
around 40 gourdes
Macroeconomic While the Growth and Poverty Reduction In 2008-2011, the Haitian government is determined to Maintenance of macroeconomic
policies Strategy Paper (GPRSP) was being prepared, strengthen macroeconomic conditions favoring faster growth stability
macroeconomic conditions were favorable and pursuit of macroeconomic stability.
for stronger growth and the pursuit of
macroeconomic stability.
Budgetary and fiscal Government revenues are low. Fiscal policy will aim at a tax burden of 14 percent in 2011. Combined strengthening of customs
policies Increase in tax receipts. and tax administration.
Reforms will be undertaken to strengthen the institutional
The ratio of tax receipts to GDP is barely capacities of tax administrations and make them more Total revenues should increase to
above 10 percent. efficient; 10.5% of GDP in 2009.
Review and updating of tax legislation;
Small deficit and no recourse to central bank Strengthening of customs control throughout the country, Total revenues represented 9.9% of
financing. particularly in provincial ports; adjustment of tax schedules; GDP in 2008.
Reforms are being made to strengthen the For the period 2007-2011, the government expects to reduce Expenditure will be higher in 2009
institutional capacities of tax administrations current expenditure to an average of 45.5% of total public owing to reconstruction needs and
and make them more efficient. expenditure, thus helping to provide the budgetary slack implementation of the GPRSP.
needed to pursue the goals set in the GPRSP framework.
On the expenditure side: control of public The overall deficit to 2009 is expected
expenditure By 2011, the deficit excluding grants is expected to narrow to to be 2.8% of GDP, but the budget
- 3% of GDP; the overall government deficit is expected to be deficit should start to narrow in 2010 to
Better allocation of public expenditure by around - 6% of GDP in 2007 and to fluctuate around - 7% of around 1.5% of GDP.
steadily increasing the proportion allocated GDP between 2007 and 2011.
to public investment and improving the
targeting and execution of expenditures in Projections for 2007-2011, based on historical trends, point to
priority sectors. a level of external grants in a range of 4-5% of GDP.
Monetary policies A prudent monetary policy aimed basically The monetary policy developed in the GPRSP framework will The annual growth of the money supply
at attaining and maintaining moderate levels aim essentially at: will be maintained around 9.3% in
of inflation. 2009, i.e. above nominal GDP growth.
attaining and maintaining a moderate level of inflation over
Maintenance of this discipline to avoid the the period of strategy implementation; Ensuring low levels of Counterinflation policy will be
need to seek public deficit financing by the inflation. continued between 2007 and 2011.
central bank,
The reforms to be implemented by the central bank will
Net foreign exchange reserves will increase clarify and rearrange the framework for executing monetary
to a level equivalent to more than three policies so as to strengthen monetary policy transmission
months' imports. mechanisms and make the instruments used more efficient.
Balance of payments Excluding official transfers, the current Between 2007 and 2011, this deficit, excluding official Private transfers can be expected to
account of the balance of payments is transfers, should be around 8% of GDP on average, trending decrease in 2009 owing to the
estimated to be in deficit by just over 6% of slightly downward owing to a continued deterioration of the international financial crisis.
GDP in 2007. trade balance.
Estimates of the current account deficit for When such official transfers are taken into account, the
2007-2011 assume that private remittances current account balance the 2007 would be reduced to just
from the Haitian diaspora will form a over 1% of GDP.
permanent and globally stable component of
Haiti's balance of payments. Private transfers should represent close to 20% of GDP in
2007, with relatively similar levels maintained throughout the
Private transfers grew by 15% in 2006/2007, period.
and by 11% in 2007-2008.
The current account balance has generally been below 2% of
GDP over the last few decades. With a view to coping with
external shocks, the target for gross foreign exchange reserves
is to accumulate the equivalent of three months' imports of
goods and services.
The growth of current transfer flows and the expected increase
in foreign direct investment (FDI) flows should contribute to
this accumulation.
Macroeconomic To provide a brief analysis of prospects for 2007-2011, two
prospects for 2007- scenarios were considered.
2011
Projections essentially relate to the period 2007-2011,
although, to characterize the scenarios, average growth rates
were kept at 6% and 4% until 2015 for the optimistic and
baseline scenarios respectively. These scenarios differ mainly
because of an increase in activity over the last two years of the
period, higher investment levels owing to improved
absorption capacities in the Haitian economy, and followed by
an increase in the level of resource mobilization.
Annex 2
Institutional Framework for Implementing and Monitoring the
Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
(GPRSP 2008-2010)
Introduction
Over the last few years, the Republic of Haiti has made significant progress in economic
recovery programs and public policy reforms aimed at facilitating development. A Growth
and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP) was prepared for the period 2008-2010,
providing a frame of reference for national development and cooperation with development
partners. Implementation of the two fundamental and strategic objectives of the GPRSP
involves a set of structural reforms that the Haitian authorities are implementing to be able to
benefit from external funding that can be used to finance investments.
In November 2006 Haiti reached the Decision Point under the Enhanced Heavily
Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative, making it eligible for interim debt relief. To attain
the Completion Point, which provides definitive debt relief and makes the country eligible
for additional resources to combat poverty, it is essential to pursue serious reforms to
maintain macroeconomic stability and ensure a satisfactory first year of implementation of
the GPRSP, as recognized in an evaluation report. It is worth noting that implementation of
the strategy, prepared through a participatory process, serves as the trigger for attaining the
Completion Point.
This paper is intended as a methodological and technical benchmark framework for
implementing, monitoring and evaluating poverty reduction and growth actions. It is
addressed to all actors and partners involved in economic development and poverty reduction
actions; and it describes the monitoring and evaluation systems to be applied through
appropriate strategies, instruments and mechanisms.
I. Setting for GPRSP implementation
The Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (GPRSP) places poverty at the heart
of global development strategies and both specific and local sector policies. It provides a
framework for all actions and mobilizes all resources obtained both from the Public Treasury
and development partners, pursuing a consistent set of objectives with targets measured
through verifiable indicators of performance, products, and outcomes between 2008 and
2010.
The strategy is being implemented in a setting shaped by major concerns over the
7
participation of all actors (State, local entities, the private sector, civil society, and
development partners), the maximum possible absorption of available resources, and an
improvement of living standards among the poorest population groups. Good governance
criteria that aim to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of institutions and strengthen
stakeholder capacities are also taken into account. An integrated global approach reflects the
need for a spatial strategy to reduce geographic and social disparities, halt the rural exodus,
and rebalance geographical areas by exploiting national and regional potentials and
resources.
Lastly, implementation of the strategic options of the GPRSP and achievement of its
global and specific goals call for a consistent and harmonious monitoring and evaluation
system, The key hub of which is essentially the circuit of resources, along with their
mobilization and evaluation.
The GPRSP will be implemented, monitored, and evaluated within the process defined
during its preparation, with involvement and participation by all stakeholders. The challenge
is to speed up economic growth, spread its benefits more effectively to reduce poverty and
social exclusion, and achieve better spatial organization.
Efforts will also be made to promote integrated local development, based on local
development schemes and land management at the level of arrondissements, boroughs and
communities (sections communales). The spatial strategy thus forms the major integrating
framework that harmonizes public policies to promote full development for the Haitian
people.
II. The GPRSP implementation mechanism
Implementation of the GPRSP, and the monitoring and evaluation of its expected
outcomes in terms of growth, poverty reduction, and better living standards, require
mechanisms to be set up to coordinate the roles of the different stakeholders. This is
essential, not only for achieving the hoped-for results, but above to ensure the coordination
and consistency of government action as a whole, and better application of the principles of
the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness in the Haitian context.
This institutional, organizational, and methodological mechanism puts the emphasis on
simple procedures and participatory modalities involving all stakeholders. The success of the
GPRSP largely depends on achieving global product and outcome indicators. It is therefore
necessary to monitor progress in terms of strategy implementation, evaluation of its impact,
monitoring and evaluation of physical and financial execution, and implementation of an
information system.
This involves three stages:
ٛ • first, an institutional stage to create and implement the structures involved;
ٛ • second, a regulatory stage to make this operational through training and awareness
raising; and
ٛ • third, an evaluation stage, to make preliminary assessments and reformulate
operating plans for priority actions.
III. Institutional Framework
The institutional framework for coordinating and monitoring GPRSP implementation is
8
constructed through mechanisms involving a flexible planning process that takes account of the
different implementation elements. This is shown in the following diagram:
Mechanism for coordinating and monitoring GPRSP implementation - National
Investment Commission (CNI)
Council for the Strategic
Orientation of Investment
(COSI)
Lenders' Consultative
Priorities Arbitration Council Council (CCB)
(CAP)
Interministerial Coordination
and Monitoring Committee
Interministerial Coordination
Departmental Coordination Executive Secretariat and Monitoring Technical
and Monitoring Subcommittee
Subcommittee
Departmental consensus Ministerial analysis and
charts programming units (UEPs)
community consensus charts
grassroots organizations and Sector charts
NGOs
9
3.1- Organizational structure of the National Investment Commission (CNI)
The National Investment Commission (CNI), sponsored by the President of the
Republic has the key mission of piloting the GPRSP implementation process. It consists of
two levels: strategic and operational.
3.1.1- Strategic level
The strategic level consists of the following:
The Council for the Strategic Orientation of Investment (Conseil d’Orientation
Stratégique - COSI), coordinated by the President of the Republic, consisting of ministers
and civil society representatives, has the key mission of tracking the performance of public
investments, particularly those related to major government works, to promote the growth
and competitiveness of the Haitian economy.
The Priorities Arbitration Committee (Comité d’Arbitrage des Priorités - CAP),
chaired by the Prime Minister, with members including the Ministers of Planning and
External Cooperation and of Economic Affairs and Finance. This committee's mission is to
provide orientation to public expenditure based on the GPRSP priorities and directives
announced by COSI, contingent upon on the funds made available in the General Budget of
the Republic. These two ministers also serve as a link between the strategic and operational
levels.
Where appropriate, the chairs of the Budget Committees of the Senate and Chamber of
Deputies can be invited to participate in arbitration meetings to gain a better understanding of
government directives in terms of public investment.
The Lenders' Consultative Council (Conseil Consultatif des Bailleurs - CCB),
chaired jointly by the Ministers of Planning and External Cooperation and Economic Affairs
and Finance, with members including representatives of the G-10 lenders. The council's
mission is to help strengthen ways of channeling and managing aid, by working together to
achieve better mobilization of financial and technical resources, to the benefit of Haiti. It will
help reconcile the policies of donor agencies and countries with Haiti's national priorities.
3.1.2- Operational level
The operational level concerns execution as such, as well as the monitoring and
evaluation of global, sector programs and projects, both specific and local.
At this stage, making stakeholders fully responsible requires decentralized
implementation of policies, programs and projects, coordinated around sector actions led by
the governing institution. The implementation system should also allow for local expression
of global, sector and specific strategic objectives.
The Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper also seeks to overcome the
disparities that exist between the different regions of the country, create basic conditions to
promote the dynamic of wealth creation at grass-roots population and local authority levels
and implement a framework for making the most of the potentials of each zone; hence the
Land Management Policy, whose key mission is to guide investments for development based
on dynamic promotion of the regions.
To compensate for the limitations of the sector development approach and ensure better
spatial consistency of actions, a new regional coordination of geographical divisions is
10
proposed, with the arrondissement as the basic operational unit. A geographic approach is
preferred for this purpose, to provide better guidelines for decentralization and
deconcentration of socio-politico-economic activities to promote regionally balanced
development.
In this approach, the arrondissements will serve as the local development planning
framework to integrate development programs and projects more effectively and strengthen
the central government's technical oversight of local bodies.
The Interministerial Implementation, Coordination, and Monitoring Committee
(Comité Interministériel de Coordination et de Suivi de la Mise en Œuvre - CICSMO)
coordinates and monitors GPRSP implementation nationally. It is located at the centre of the
general orientation and execution mechanism, and serves as a functional intermediary
between COSI, CAP and the CCB.
The committee consists of the Ministers of Planning and External Cooperation and
Economic Affairs and Finance, supported by five ministers from priority sectors (MARNDR,
MTPTC, MENFP, MSPP and MJSP); and it is chaired by the Minister of Planning an
External Cooperation (MPCE). It works executing agencies such as ministries, public
agencies, local authorities, institutional stakeholders from civil society, and NGOs
recognized in terms of project execution.
CICSMO establishes the elements for strategy application, arbitrates between proposals
for correcting actions, issues directives for effective strategy execution, reviews the GPRSP
implementation progress and identifies its success factors, namely criteria and modalities for
monitoring the quantitative indicators, coordination of programming, execution, monitoring,
and evaluation of GPRSP actions, harmonization of project choice decisions, and support for
financial arbitration decisions, among others.
It also acts in conjunction with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance (MEF),
and sector ministries through their Analysis and Programming Units (Unités d’etude et de
programmation - UEPs).
CICSMO Powers
CICSMO has powers to:
(a) issue directives as necessary for effective strategy execution;
(b) review the progress of GPRSP implementation;
(c) specify suitable alterations to update the GPRSP;
(d) approve the planning of resources for programs and projects in accordance with the
pillars of the GPRSP; and
(e) approve quarterly reports on the status of GPRSP physical-financial progress and
evaluation reports on its policies, actions, programs and projects.
CICSMO is supported by an executive secretariat which coordinates and monitors GPRSP
implementation. The main powers of the executive secretariat are to:
11
• Ensure regular and permanent monitoring of strategy execution; Assist ministers
involved in the different stages of the process of planning and executing GPRSP-
related policies, programs and projects;
• Submit programs and projects for approval by the Interministerial Coordination
Committee;
• Coordinate ex ante and ex post monitoring and evaluation of GPRSP policies,
programs and projects, in conjunction with the ministries and institutions concerned;
• Facilitate normal flow of funds to execute GPRSP-related programs and projects;
• Prepare and submit to the Interministerial Coordination Committee, periodic progress
and monitoring reports on GPRSP policies, programs and projects;
• Prepare detailed reports as requested by the Interministerial Coordination Committee;
• Ensure organic liaison between the different elements of the CNI, by preparing the
corresponding dossiers.
The Executive Secretariat consists of:
• A technical specialist responsible for coordinating the execution and monitoring of
GPRSP sector program and project work plans;
• A technical specialist to coordinate the preparation of GPRSP sector program and
project documents;
• A technical specialist responsible for monitoring and evaluation of GPRSP policies
and impact;
• A person responsible for maintaining and updating specific status charts for
monitoring: the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), progress in implementation
of the principles of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, progress in public
finance reforms (PEMFAR), and progress criteria for lifting Haiti out of the least
advanced countries (LAC) category;
• A person responsible for information and awareness-raising to ensure that the GPRSP
achieves ownership by all sectors;
• A person responsible for technical and logistic coordination of operations to
implement the GPRSP.
The Executive Secretariat will also be supported by the MPCE Departmental Divisions
Coordination Unit (L’Unité de coordination des directions départementales), which will
provide logistic and communications support with these divisions and the ministries
concerned to facilitate transmission of dossiers, directives and reports between central
government and the GPRSP Departmental Coordination Units.
On the administrative and financial front, the Executive Secretariat is assisted by the
MPCE Administrative and Budgetary Affairs Division, which executes the expenses needed
for GPRSP implementation activities. To deal with these different elements, the CICSMO
Executive Secretariat is assisted by:
(A) An Interministerial Technical Subcommittee for Sector Coordination and
Monitoring of the GPRSP (Sous comité technique interministériel de coordination et de
suivi sectoriel - SCTICSMO), to ensure sector technical and operational coordination of
execution and monitoring of GPRSP priority actions both nationally and locally, prepares
reports for higher-level bodies, promotes partnership and manages the information network.
12
The committee consists of representatives from sector ministries, civil society and lenders,
and is coordinated by the MPCE Economic and Social Programming Division (Direction de
programmation économique et sociale - DPES). Sector representatives will also coordinate
the UEPs, which will advise the minister. SCTICSMO meets with the CICSMO Executive
Secretariat at least once a month to propose corrections to CICSMO. The working meetings
of the subcommittee are used, among other things, to evaluate strategy execution in each
sector and to review the status of actions implemented in each sector, define suitable
alterations to facilitate the execution of programs and projects, and update the GPRSP.
SCTICSMO will also be supported by specific sector thematic charts (Tables sectorielles
ou thématiques) and the technical divisions and services of the MPCE, the DEE of the MEF,
the technical units involved in the General Budget Directorate (DGB), and the Haitian
Institute of Statistics and Information (IHSI). It also collaborates with the National
Geospatial Information Centre (Centre national de l’information géo-spatiale - CNIGS) and
the National Observatory of Poverty and Social Exclusion (Observatoire nationale de la
pauvreté et de l’exclusion sociale - ONPES) on matters pertaining to their respective
competencies.
(B) A Departmental Subcommittee for Implementation Coordination and
Monitoring (Sous Comité Départemental de Coordination et Suivi de la mise en œuvre -
SCDCSMO), chaired and coordinated by the respective Departmental Director of the MPCE,
with the MPCE Departmental Division acting as secretariat. The SCDCSMO is coordinated
nationally by the Land Management Unit (UAT), in conjunction with the DPES and the
MPCE's Departmental Division Coordination Unit (UCDD). The Departmental
Subcommittee consists of all sector departmental directors and the regional directors of
autonomous state agencies, as well as civil-society and lender representatives. It promotes
partnership, and manages the information and communication network for the department. It
technically supervises grassroots and civil society organizations, as well as partners in the
participatory monitoring system. It sends a regular quarterly GPRSP monitoring report to the
CICSMO Executive Secretariat, updating the trends of poverty reduction programs and
projects at the departmental level. Its attributions will also include helping to form a databank
on the GPRSP at the departmental level, and tracking the trend of programs and projects in
boroughs (communes) and communities (sections communales). The SCDCSMO is assisted
by Departmental Consensus Charts (Tables départementales de concertation - TDC) and by
the Departmental Technical Council (CTD).
It is also supported, as necessary, by Community Consensus Charts (Tables communales
de concertation - TCC) which are consultation groups based on mayoralties, CASEC, ASEC
and grassroots organizations.
Grassroots organizations and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) will support the
subcommittee by providing information on their respective domains and intervention sectors.
Geographically decentralized services and deconcentrated services from the transferred
domains will send a regular report on issues in their jurisdiction to their respective ministries,
with copies to the departmental delegation concerned and to the SCDCSMO; and they will
maintain close relations with the UEPs and respective ministries.
At both the national and departmental levels, monitoring and evaluation structures will
mobilize all actors from central government, local authorities, civil society and the private
13
sector, upholding principles of equity, celerity and proximity. Lenders will also be associated
with monitoring and evaluation agencies. An information mechanism will be implemented to
improve links between the various bodies. Regulations will establish the composition,
structuring and functioning of all these bodies, and procedures will be designed by the UEPs
in the ministries concerned to define working modalities between the various actors to
execute and monitor GPRSP programs and projects.
(C) CICSMO support structures.
The various MPCE technical divisions share and distribute responsibilities for
coordinating GPRSP implementation, monitoring and evaluation. They are supported by the
ONPES, CNIGS, and IHSI, as well as by the sector ministry UEPs.
Regular monitoring of the GPRSP will be the responsibility of MPCE entities. The MEP
will also play a key role through the DGB, the Treasury Department (DT), the DEE, and the
IHSI. Support structures are involved on the basis of their specific missions and attributions
within the ministries and institutions, as follows:
(a) The DPES of the MPCE in conjunction with the DEE of the MEF, the UAT of the
MPCE, the ONPES and the UEPs of sector ministries will be responsible for monitoring the
GPRSP strategy and its global and specific policies.
These different structures will jointly: (i) monitor the trend of the macroeconomic
framework; (ii) ensure that lenders' strategies and interventions are consistent with those of
the GPRSP; (iii) oversee the local impact of interventions to reduce regional disparities; (iv)
produce and publish an annual monitoring report containing a balance sheet and
recommendations for the GPRSP; (v) help develop evaluation capacity as a tool to assist
decision-making and make the public sector more effective; (vi) strengthen capacities for
analysis and formulation of development and poverty reduction policies;
(b) The Public Investment Division (Direction de l’investissement public - DIP) of the
MPCE, supported by the UEPs in the sector ministries, will be responsible for programming
and coordinating implementation of the public investment program (PIP) in terms of the
involvement of the operators concerned, reporting to the authorities specifically in terms of
the results indicators and proposing any necessary adjustments.
(c) The External Cooperation Division (Direction de la coopération externe - DCE) and
the NGO Activities Coordination Unit (Unité de coordination des activités des ONG -
UCAONG) will support the different constructors involved in seeking, mobilizing and
monitoring financing with development partners, within the spirit of the general principles of
the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, as it affects each one.
(d) The DSE of the MPCE, supported by the UEPs in the sector ministries will be at the
centre of the system of public investment monitoring implemented in the GPRSP framework.
It will ensure that: (i) action plans are executed; (ii) tools for monitoring the execution of all
GPRSP actions throughout the country are used and applied; and (iii) reports on the status of
physical and financial progress of GPRSP actions are prepared by the execution and analysis
units;
(e) The MPCE Departmental Divisions, in conjunction with the departmental divisions
of sector ministries, geographically deconcentrated autonomous bodies, and NGOs, will
participate in monitoring and evaluation of GPRSP actions locally.
(f) In support of the foregoing structures, the ONPES will be responsible for monitoring
14
impact and participation, as well as evaluating the GPRSP evaluation in conjunction with
other MPCE bodies, even though has other broader main functions than monitoring the
GPRSP.
(g) The CNIGS will work in close conjunction with the UAT of the MPCE and other
sector institutions involved in cartographic production, particularly in terms of implementing
the various spatial planning tools.
(h) The DEE of the MEF, in conjunction with the DPES of the MPCE will monitor the
global and specific policies of the GPRSP, particularly macroeconomic policies.
(i) The DT of the MEF will oversee the deployment and use of budgetary funds allocated
to the execution of programs and projects arising from GPRSP priority actions. It plays a key
treasury role in terms of resources allocated to GPRSP implementation. It is also involved in
strengthening public accounting practices in all institutions involved in the public finance
reform.
(j) The DGB of the MEF, in conjunction with other institutions involved, particularly the
MEF, MPCE, DGI, and AGD, plays a fundamental role in public finance reform. Among
other things, it generates public finance statistics by identifying budgetary expenses linked to
poverty reduction. In collaboration with the MPCE, it will work to successfully implement
the GPRSP and set up the CDMT and CBMT. It will also support sector ministries, in
establishing the CDSMT, and particularly to implement program budgeting. In conjunction
with the MPCE units involved in budget preparation, execution and monitoring, the DGB
will oversee the conformity of operations to commit public expenditure to implement the
GPRSP and the availability of the necessary funds. Lastly, in conjunction with the MPCE, it
will develop budgetary instruments to integrate recurrent GPRSP expenditure into the
government's operating budget.
(k) The IHSI coordinates the national statistics system and produces global and sector
statistics for the entire country, particularly for monitoring the GPRSP. It provides technical
support to the UEPs of the various sector ministries as needed to produce sector statistics. It
creates a formal framework for consensus and exchange with the MPCE, MEF and ONPES,
as well as sector and specific statistics production structures. It also prepares and implements
harmonized standards, methods and statistical tools to strengthen the quantitative and
qualitative reliability of survey data.
(l) The sector ministry UEPs coordinate the actions of their respective sectors, by
ensuring the planning, coordination, policy supervision, programming of development
projects and activities of all institutions in the sector in question. They provide overall
supervision for the technical execution units of programs and projects in their sector, and
they approve the physical-financial reports of the various programs and projects related to
their sector. They will also serve as ministerial focus points by providing support, through
their services or under the governance of the ministry in question, for the operational
monitoring of strategy policies and programs in their sector. In this regard, the ministry UEP
will: (i) ensure the poverty dimension is taken into account when preparing, implementing,
monitoring and evaluating its sector program; (ii) monitor the strategy indicators in the
domains in question; (iii) ensure the maintenance and coordination of strategy
implementation activities in the sector.
Dossier holders, i.e. resource officers, will be appointed in each ministry to ensure
proper implementation of the GPRSP in their respective sector. They will collaborate with
15
the UEPs and have responsibility for operational monitoring of specific dossiers such as
public finance reform, reform and modernization of the State, and institutional capacity
strengthening.
The following chart illustrates the PRSP monitoring and evaluation mechanism
implemented to execute monitoring and evaluation functions through two subsystems
through which the specified activities will be undertaken by the partner entities responsible
for these activities.
GPRSP Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism
Functions Subsystems Activities Partner structures
Monitoring of IHS/DPES
welfare indicators ministerial UEPs,
(MDGs, …) ONPES, civil
Monitoring of society
household poverty
and living Monitoring of
standards indicators specific
to poor households
Monitoring
Monitoring of
financial resources
DGB/DPES, DIP,
Treasury
Department,
Monitoring of the Monitoring of ministerial UEPs
execution of GPRSP resources/activities/
policies, programs, outcomes
and projects
DPES/DEE, DIP,
DSE, BRH,
Results monitoring ministerial UEPs
Partial evaluation
of PPs, and specific
interventions
Evaluation ONPES/ DPES,
civil society,
private sector,
ministerial UEPs
Global evaluation
of GPRSP impact
16
17
Annex 3
Main GPRSP monitoring indicators
Monetary Poverty
Indicator values Progress toward
Indicators the MDGs
1986- 1999- 2001
1987 2000
Proportion of the
population living in 60 48 55 Slow regression
extreme poverty (%)
Proportion of the
population living in 59.6 48 76 Rapid regression
relative poverty (%)
Education
Indicator values Progress
Indicators toward the
1990 1995 2000 2005-06 MDGs
Net primary school Rapid
22.1 51.4 67 49.6
enrolment rate (%) progress
Girl/boy ratio in primary Rapid
0.94 0.93 1.084 1.02
education progress
Literacy rate among Rapid
54.8 n/a 64.4 82.4
15-24 year olds progress
Share of education in the
state budget (UEH- n/a 9.36 16.68 12.99
MENFP) (%)
Student pass rate in
official exams (Rétho - Slow
60.67 29.53 39.50 48.34
Philo) progress
Girl/boy ratio in
0.96 n/a 1.283 0.94
secondary education
Girl/boy ratio in primary
and secondary education 95 Slow
95 n/a n/a
(%) regression
18
Health
Indicator values
Progress
2005- toward the
Indicators 1990 1995 2000 06 MDGs
Under-five mortality
Rapid progress
rate per 1,000 births 140.6 137.7 86
Maternal mortality
rate per 100,000 live
births 457 474 520 630 Regression
Child mortality rate
Slow progress
per 1,000 live births 110 87.1 89.4 57
HIV prevalence rate
Rapid progress
among the population - 5 5.5 2.2
Prevalence of modern
contraceptive
methods (%) - 24.8
Percentage of women
attending antenatal Slow progress
checkup - 67.7 78.8 84.5
Proportion of
population with
access to a better
sanitation system (%) - - - 16.5
Percentage of Community Health Units (UCS) offering minimum health care
package: 0.54 % (2007)
19
Macroeconomy governance/corruption
Indicators 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Annual GDP
0.9 -1.0 -0.3 0.4 -3.5 1.80 2.3 3.4 1.3
growth rate
Real interest rate 12,462 16,089 10,093 4,383 11,214 10,283
Investment rate 27.3 25.8 25.1 30.7 27.3 27.4 28.8 27.7 25.6
Export/GDP ratio 12.70% 12.36% 12.13% 15.82% 15.35% 14.41% 14.30% 11.01% -
FDI growth rate
-55.83 -66.79 29.55 142.11 -57.25 340.68 515.38 -53.44 -
Public expenditure
committed (% of 11.14% 10.70 11.70 12.60 12.02% 10.10 11.52% 12.16% 10.86%
GDP)
The proportion of expenditure executed on poverty reduction is estimated at 30.9%, based
on the current definition. It is higher in terms of investment expenditure (40.2%) than
operating expenses (27.6%).
Share of public Disparities in execution rates exist both for expenditure on poverty reduction (32.0%) and
expenditure for total expenditure (4.4%), stemming mainly from very low execution rates in
allocated to investment expenditure, whether for poverty reduction (14.3%) or total (19.5%).
poverty reduction
The smaller relative share of expenditure on poverty reduction is greater in terms of
execution rates, which are much lower than those of total expenditure. This weak
performance of public expenditure also conceals methodological problems relating to the
definition of poverty reduction expenditure consistent with the GPRSP priorities.
Indicators 1995 2000 2004 2005-06 2007 2008
Share of justice sector in the annual state
budget 7.94% 7.52% 8.18% 9.61% 6.59% 12.22%
Corruption perceptions index 131 145 163 177 -
20
Annex 4
The MDG Situation
The available figures show that few of the MDG targets will be achieved by 2015, as the
gaps that remain are too wide. Examples include maternal health, where the trend has
reversed (from progress to regression), and infant mortality, where progress is rather slow.
Other targets are not out of reach, however, provided suitable measures are taken in time; e.g.
the percentage of the population without access to drinking water is making progress, albeit
slowly; and the trends of school enrolment and literacy rates are reasonable in relation to the
targets to be met. Some targets have already been attained or are about to be, such as the HIV
prevalence rate which is displaying a very promising trend (rapid progress), even though
Haiti still has the highest prevalence in the region. Considerable progress has also been made
in terms of the boy/girl ratio in primary and secondary education, which is now close to
parity. The table below shows the trend of selected MDG indicators and their progress for the
period 1990-2006.
Selected MDG indicators (1990-2006)
Targets Gap to be
Indicators 1990 1995 2000 2005-06 Progress
for 2015 bridged
Maternal mortality rate per
457.0 474.0 520.0 630.0 114.01 regression very large
100,000 live births
Proportion of the urban
population with access to an 47.0 43.0 49.0 55.2 94.0 slow large
improved water source (%)
Proportion of children under
26.8 27.5 17.3 22.2 13.4 slow large
weight (%)
Net primary school enrolment
36.4 54.3 49.6 100.0 slow large
rate
Literacy rate among 15-24 year
54.8 64.4 82.4 100.0 fast small
olds
Infant-juvenile mortality rate
140.6 137.7 86.0 60.0 slow large
per 1000 live births
Infant mortality rate* per 1,000
110.0 87.1 89.4 57.0 36.7 slow large
live births
HIV prevalence rate among the
5.0 5.5 2.2 1.5 fast small
population
Primary school girl/boy ratio 0.9 1.0 1 fast small
Source: EMMUS II (1994-95); EMMUS III (2000); EMMUS IV (2005-06); RNPD (2006).
The amounts shown in green are the targets to be achieved by 2015.
It should be noted that development aid provided to Haiti has not been constant. Moreover, foreign
agencies are not adhering to the GPRSP objectives, and are consequently out of step with the
principles of the Paris Declaration. As a result, MDG No. 8, calling for a global development
21
partnership, seems far from attainable by Haiti between now and 2015. Considering the initial GPRSP
cost estimates of roughly US$3.8 billion for 2008-2010, and the fact that a total of about US$1.9
billion has been committed by partners, there is a funding gap of US$1.9 billion. This is unequally
distributed across the different pillars of the GPRSP; e.g. Pillar 1 (Growth vectors) requires US$2.1
billion, but only 28 percent has been committed by partners, which is too little. Pillar 3 (Justice and
Security) requires US$285 million, of which 33.1 percent has been committed — again not enough.
22
Annex 5
The poverty and inequality situation
Table 1: Proportion of the population
with less than US$1 a day (PPP), or incidence of extreme poverty
1990 56.8
2001 54
2005 56
Sources: FAFO/World Bank.
Despite falling by 5 percent between 1990 and 2001, the proportion of the population
living on less than US$1 a day (PPP), increased by 3 percent in 2005. As one of the MDGs,
this indicator is supposed to reach a level of 28.4 percent by 2015, i.e. a reduction of 49
percent.
Table 2: Proportion of the population with
less than US$2 per day (PPP), or incidence of poverty
Sources: FAFO/World Bank.
A 16.9 percent increase in five years. Haiti has the highest poverty rate in Latin America and
the Caribbean.
23
Depth of poverty
Table 3: Depth of poverty
Metropolitan area 0.10
Other urban areas 0.33
Rural areas 0.37
Total 0.31
Source: FAFO Poverty Profile, 2005.
The share of national consumption obtained by the poorest income quintile is measured
as that obtained by the poorest 20 percent of the population; whereas the share of the
wealthiest group corresponds to the highest 20 percent of incomes. Data on personal or
household income or consumption comes from nationally representative household surveys.
The distribution is based on percentiles of the population, rather than on households, which
are classified by income or expenditure per person.
Table 4: Share of national consumption by the top and bottom quintiles
Poorest 20% 1.4
Richest 20% 69.6
Sources: IHSI-ECVH, 2001.
Gini Coefficient
Table 5: Trend of the Gini index
Year 1986-87 1999 2000 2001
Rural areas 0.489 - 0.449 0.60
Other cities 0.376 - 0.474 0.61
Metropolitan area 0.416 0.586 0.50
Total 0.52 0.63 0.51 0.65
Sources: MEF /MPCE/IHSI/RNDH, 2002.
In 2001, the Gini concentration index was 26.8 percent higher than its 1986-87 level.
Following a sharp drop in 2000 (by 19.2 percent in relation to the 1999 level), the indicator
24
rose in 2001.
25
General comments
An analysis of poverty and living standards in Haiti shows that there are no easy answers
to the following questions: how many poor people are there in Haiti; or what are the living
conditions of the Haitian population? Answers to these questions depend on the poverty
concept and measurements used. Moreover, the frequent absence of statistics, and the
unreliability of those that do exist, result in approximations and heroic generalizations being
made in any attempt to answer them.
The World Bank defines anyone whose income is below US$1 a day as "extremely
poor", and anyone whose income is below US$2 per day as "poor". Accordingly, these are
the definitions used in this analysis to attempt to answer the questions posed above. This
choice of indicators is based on an objective view of poverty, the implicit assumption being
that each individual, regardless of age and individual characteristics, needs a minimum
income of about that amount to achieve decent living conditions. Compared the concept used
by the UNDP in its Human Development Indicator, the World Bank's approach is somewhat
more progressive. It prefers a discontinuous view of poverty (it is interested in the number of
poor rather than variations in the intensity of poverty among the poor); and it prefers a static
concept since it is concerned with the absolute number of poor people at a given point in time
rather than individual situations that cause a person to enter or escape from a poverty
situation.
26
Annex 6
Increase in poverty among the population and its vulnerability
The analysis is based on data from surveys made by Vanderbilt University in 2006 and
2007 using a sample of 1,536 people in the different departments of the country. The aim was
to ascertain how people perceive the increase in poverty and vulnerability over the last two
years.
We made a comparative and descriptive analysis of the variables, to broadly explain the
poverty and vulnerability situation among the people surveyed.
Most of those interviewed claimed not to be satisfied with their living standard in 2008
Are you satisfied with your standard of living? (LAPOP 2008)
Not very
Very satisfied Satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Sex Men 6.5% 11.7% 17.2% 14.8% 50.1%
Women 8.2% 12.4% 15.0% 14.3% 49.9%
Total 14.8% 24.1% 32.1% 29.1% 100.0%
Are you satisfied with your standard of living?
(Percentages)
Legend: Are you satisfied
Very satisfactory
Satisfactory
Not very satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
27
Monthly income (percentage) 2008 LAPOP
2006 2008
No income 37.6 30.2
2,000 gourdes or less 10.0 14.5
2,001- 3,000 gourdes 14.0 15.4
3,001-5,000 gourdes 18.3 18.3
5,001-8,000 gourdes 8.4 11.2
8,001-13,000 gourdes 4.7 6.5
13,001-20,000 gourdes 3.9 1.9
20,001- 30,000 gourdes 1.2 0.5
30,001-50,000 gourdes 0.7 0.7
50,000- 80,000 gourdes 0.2 0.3
Over 80,000 gourdes 0.9 0.3
Total 100.0 100.0
The proportion of people in the income bracket of 3,000 gourdes or less grew by about 30
percent between 2006 and 2008, whereas those with incomes between 3,000 and 13,001 gourdes
shrank by about 8 percent.
Family expenditure and income in percentages
2006 2008
Sufficient income, with saving 10.4 3.1
Sufficient income, without saving 17.3 13.7
Insufficient income 49.8 49.0
Insufficient income even for food consumption 22.5 34.1
Total 100.0 100.0
People saved much more in 2006 than in 2008, when over 34 percent of people considered their
income insufficient to satisfy their food needs. This shows that the situation has deteriorated in just
two years.
In 2008, almost 50 percent of the population survey were receiving transfers from abroad, while
nearly 29 percent did not receive any in 2006. People depend much more on their families or friends
in 2008 than they did in 2006.
28
Transfers from abroad in percentages (2006-2008)
2006 2008
Yes 28.8 49.2
No 71.2 50.8
Total 100.0 100
Moreover, people spent over 45 percent of their transfer income on consumption and
about 24 percent on education for their children in 2008, as shown in greater detail in the
following table.
How transfer income is spent (percentages)
2008
Consumption (food, clothing) 47.3
Housing (construction, repair) 8.2
Education 23.9
Community (school repair, church building) 0.8
Health 2.4
Saving/investment 1.8
Other 15.6
Total 100.0
Young people between 18 and 24 years of age were more likely to be living with their
parents in 2006. The fact that this proportion decreased by 7 percent in 2008 shows that
young people have become relatively more independent.
Percentage of young people of 18-24 years of age living with their parents
2008
Yes 58.9
No 41.1
Total 100.0
29
The following table broadly shows this situation:
Percentage of young people of 18-24 years of age employed and living with
their parents
2006 2008
1 31.5 56.4
2 34.0 26.4
3 16.3 7.5
4 12.2 4.0
5 3.3 1.8
6 1.7 2.6
7 and over 1.1 1.3
Total 100.0 100.0
In terms of employment, 62 percent claimed to have a job in 2008, while about 37
percent did not. In 2006, 48 percent were not working, while 51.2 percent had a job.
Nonetheless, women are much less likely to be employed than men.
Employment in 2008 by sex
Job?
No Yes Total
Sex Men 62.0 103.0 165.0
Women 56.0 93.0 149.0
Total 118.0 196.0 314.0
Legend: Sex: Men Women
Job: Yes No
30
Receiving a wage does not give entitlement to employment insurance, however,
although the situation had improved by 2008.
Employment insurance (percentages)
2006 2008
Yes 16.3 19.9
No 83.7 80.1
Total 100.0 100.0
Use of public health services. LAPOP surveys
No Yes Total
Sex Men 71.6 119.4 191.0
Women 85.4 142.6 228.0
Total 157.0 262.0 419.0
Citizens' appreciation of the economic situation in the country and their own, nationally
in 200_ and 2008 (%)
How do you see the country's economic situation? 2006 2008
Better 0.3 0.4
Good 3.3 0.3
Not bad 17.4 14.6
Bad 44.8 39.1
Worse 34.3 45.6
How do you see your personal economic situation? 2006 2008
Better 0.2 0.3
Good 4.6 1.9
Not bad 25.9 26.2
Bad 46.6 36.0
Worse 22.8 35.7
Do you think the country's economic situation is improving,
2006 2008
staying the same, or deteriorating compared to 12 months ago?
Improving 2.4 1.6
Staying the same 42.0 16.6
Deteriorating 55.6 81.8
31
Do you think your personal economic situation is improving,
2006 2008
staying the same, or deteriorating compared to 12 months ago?
Improving 1.9 3.9
Staying the same 49.1 24.8
Deteriorating 49.0 71.3
Do you think that, in the next 12 months, the country's economic
2008
situation will improve, stay the same, or deteriorate?
Improve 3.3
Stay the same 22.1
Deteriorate 74.6
In general, are you satisfied with your standard of living? Would
2008
you say…
Very satisfied 14.8
Quite satisfied 24.1
Generally dissatisfied 32.1
Totally dissatisfied 29.1
32
Annex 7
Trends and projections of 13 of the 48 MDG indicators
(Indicators in bold are shown graphically; * indicates trend)
33
Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
Target 1 Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of 1. Proportion of population with less than one dollar a
people whose income is less than one dollar a day day, in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms
1A. Proportion of the population below the national poverty
line
2. Poverty gap index (incidence of poverty multiplied by the
degree of poverty)
3. Share of the poorest population quintile in national
consumption
Target 2 Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of 4. Prevalence of underweight children under five years
people who suffer from hunger of age
5. Proportion of the population suffering from hunger
Pourcentage de la
population ayant un revenu 1990 : 56,8%
inférieur à 1 $US par jour 2003 : 56%
2015 : 28,4%
2015* = 55%
56.8 GAP2003 = 26.8%
GAP2000 = 10.6%
56.0
}
55.0
G
A
P
28.4
Année
1990 2003 2015
Legend: Percentage of population with less than US$1 a day Year
Pourcentage d’enfants de Pource nta ge de la
moins de 5 ans présentant 1990 : 26,8% populatio n soufra nt de la 1990 : 65%
une insuffisance pondérale 2005 : 22,2% faim 2001 : 51%
2015 : 13,4% 2015 : 32.5%
26.8 65.0 2015*
2015*==33.2%
33.2%
2015* = 19.4%
GAP2005 = 6.0% GAP = =
GAP2005 0.7%
0.7%
22.2
}
51.0
19.4 G
A
P
} G
33.2 A
P
13.4 32.5
Année Année
1990 2005 2015 1990 2001 2015
Legend: Percentage of under-fives suffering from low weight Percentage of population suffering from hunger
Year
34
Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education
Target 3 Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys 6. Net enrolment ratio in primary education
and girls alike, will be able to complete a full
course of primary schooling 7. Proportion of pupils starting grade 1 who reach the
fifth grade of primary
8. Literacy rate of 15-24 year olds
Net primary school
enrolment rate 1990: 36.4%
2005: 49.6%
2015: 100%
2015* = 58.4%
GAP2005 = 41.6%?
GAP2000 = 0.0%?
}
100
G
A
P
49.6 58.4
36.4
Year
1990 2005 2015
Literacy rate of 15-24 year
olds 1990: 54.8%
2005: 82.4%
2015: 100%
100
Good
82.4 progress
54.8
Year
1990 2005 2015
35
Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women
Target 4 Eliminate gender disparity in primary and 9. Ratios of girls to boys in primary, secondary, and
secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in tertiary education
all levels of education no later than 2015
10. Literacy rate among women of 15-24 years old in
relation to the rate for men
11. Proportion of women in wage employment in the
nonagricultural sector
12. Proportion of seats held by women in the national
Parliament
Girl/boy ratio in
primary and secondary education
Prim. Sec.
1990 : 0.87 0.96
2005: 1.02 0.94
2015: 1 1
1 Primary:
1.02 already achieved
0.96
Secondary:
0.94 nearly achieved
0.87
Year
1990 2005 2015
Taux d’alphabétisation des
femmes de 15 à 24 ans par
rapport à celui des hommes 1990 : 0,96
2005 : 0,95
2015 : 1
Presque atteint
1
0.96 0.95
Année
1990 2005 2015
Legend: Female/male literacy ratio of 15-24 year olds
Nearly achieved Year
36
Goal 4: Reduce the under-five mortality rate
Target 5 Reduce by two thirds, between 1990 and 2015, 13. Under-five mortality rate
the under-five mortality rate
14. Infant mortality rate
15. Proportion of one-year-old children immunized
against measles
Taux de mortalité des enfants
de moins de 5 ans (pour 1000 1992 : 131
naissances vivantes 2005 : 86
2015 : 44,5
131
2015* = 510.4%
51.4
GAP62005
== 6.96.9%
GAP2000 = 51.0%
86
51.4
} GA
44.5
P
Année
1992 2005 2015
Legend: Under-five mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) Year
Taux de mortalité infantile
(pour 1000 naissances 1990 : 102
vivantes 2005 : 57
2015 : 44.5
2015* = 27
102
57
Bonne
44.5 progression
27
Année
1990 2005 2015
Legend: Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) Good progress Year
37
Goal 5: Improve maternal health
Target 6 Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 16. Maternal mortality ratio
2015, the maternal mortality ratio
17. Proportion of births attended by skilled health
personnel
Taux de mortalité
maternelle (pour 1000 1990 : 4,57
naissances vivantes) 2005 : 6,30
2015 : 1,14 2015* = 7.50
GAP2005 = 6.44
GAP2000 = 5.84
Progression
7.50
6.30
4.57
Sens
inverse
1.14
Cible
Année
1990 2005 2015
Legend: Maternal mortality rate (per 1,000 live births)
Progress
Reversal of trend
Target
Year
38
Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases
Target 7 Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the 18. HIV prevalence among population aged 15-24 years
current trend of HIV/AIDS
19. Rate of condom use in relation to contraceptive prevalence
19A. Condom use at last high-risk sex
19B. Proportion of population aged 15-24 years with
comprehensive correct knowledge of HIV/AIDS
19C. Contraceptives prevalence rate
20. Ratio of school attendance of orphans to school attendance of
non-orphans aged 10-14 years
Target 8 Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the 21. Incidence and death rates associated with malaria
current trend of the incidence of malaria and other
major diseases 22. Proportion of the population living in risk zones who use
effective anti-malaria prevention methods and treatments
23. Prevalence and death rates associated with tuberculosis
24. Proportion of tuberculosis cases detected and cured under
directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS)
Tuberculose, nombre de
décès pour 100,000 habitants 1990 : 128
2005 : 66
2015 : tend vers 0
2015* = 24.7
GAP24 =
128
66
G
A
24.7
P
Année
1990 2004 2015
Legend: Tuberculosis, No. of deaths per 100,000 inhabitants 2015 approaching 0 Year
39
Pourcentage de femmes
enceintes infectées par 1993 : 6,2%
le VIH/Sida 2005 : 2,2%
2015 : 0%
6.2
En bonne
Progression
2.2 mais niveau
plus élevé des
Caraïbes
Année
1993 2005 2015
Legend: Percentage of pregnant women infected by HIV/AIDS
Good progress although highest level in the Caribbean
Year
40
Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability
Target 9 Integrate the principles of sustainable development 25. Proportion of land area covered by forest
into country policies and programs and reverse the
loss of environmental resources 26. Proportion of areas protected to preserve biodiversity
(in relation to total area)
27. Energy consumption (in kilograms of oil equivalent)
per dollar of GDP (PPP)
28. Carbon dioxide emissions (per inhabitant) and
consumption of ozone-layer-depleting
chlorofluorocarbons
29. Proportion of the population using solid fuels
Target 10 Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without 30. Proportion of the population with durable access
sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic to an improved drinking water source (urban and
sanitation rural zones)
31. Proportion of the population with access to an
improved sanitation system (urban and rural zones)
Target 11 By 2020, to have achieved a significant 32. Proportion of households with access to secure tenure
improvement in the lives of at least 100 million of housing
slum dwellers
Proportion de la population
ayant accès de façon durable à 1990 : 47%
une source d’eau meilleure 2005 : 55,2%
2015 : 69.5%
2015* = 60.7
GAP2005 = 8.8 Progression très lente
GAP2001 = 3.5
69.5
55.2 G
60.7
A
47 P
Année
1990 2005 2015
Legend: Proportion of the population with sustainable access to an improved water source
Very slow progress
Year
41
Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development
Target 12 Develop further an open, rule-based, 33. Net ODA, total and to the least developed countries,
predictable, and non-discriminatory as a percentage of OECD/DAC donors' gross national
multilateral trading and financial system, income.
including a commitment to good 34. Bilateral ODA allocated by OECD/CAD donor
governance, development and poverty countries to basic social services (basic education,
reduction both nationally and primary health care, nutrition, safe water and
internationally. sanitation).
Target 13 Address the special needs of the least 35. Proportion of bilateral official development
developed nations. Achieving this goal assistance of OECD/CAD donors that is untied.
involves tariff- and quota-free access for 36. ODA received in landlocked developing countries
the least developed countries' exports; as a proportion of their gross national incomes (GNI).
Implementation of an enhanced program of 37. ODA received in small island developing states as a
debt relief for heavily indebted poor proportion of their GNI.
countries and the cancellation of bilateral
public debts; more generous provision of
ODA to countries committed to poverty
reduction.
Target 14 Address the special needs of landlocked 38. Proportion of total developed country imports (by
developing countries and small island value and excluding arms) from developing countries
developing states (through the program of and least developed countries, admitted free of duty.
action for the sustainable development of
small island developing states and the
outcome of the 22nd Special Session of the
General Assembly).
Target 15 Deal comprehensively with the debt problems 39. Average tariffs imposed by developed countries on
of developing countries through national and agricultural products and textiles and clothing from
international measures in order to make debt developing countries.
sustainable in the long term. 40. Agricultural support estimate for OECD countries as a
percentage of their GDP.
41. Proportion of ODA provided to help build trade capacity.
42. Total number of countries that have reached their HIPC
Decision Points and number that have reached their HIPC
Completion Points (cumulative).
43. Debt relief committed under the HIPC initiative.
44. Debt service, as a percentage of exports of goods and
services.
Target 16 In cooperation with developing countries, 45. Rate of unemployment, total and by sex, of young people
formulate and apply strategies that enable of 15-24 years of age.
young people to find decent and productive
work.
Target 17 In cooperation with 46. Proportion of the population with access to affordable
the pharmaceutical companies, provide access essential drugs on a sustainable basis.
to affordable essential drugs in developing
countries.
Target 18 In cooperation with the private sector, make the 47. Number of telephone lines per 100 population.
benefits of new technologies available to all, 48A. Number of personal computers and Internet users per
especially information and communications. 100 population.
48B. Number of Internet users per 100 population.
42
Annex 8
Chart of Priority Actions
Pillar I: Growth vectors
Global objectives Specific objectives No. of Actions
Agriculture 1 8 23
Tourism 1 2 8
Trade and industry 1 5 19
Infrastructure 1 5 15
Subtotal 4 20 65
Pillar II: Human development - Priorities in basic social services
Global objectives Specific objectives No. of Actions
Education and 1 7 48
training
Health 1 8 28
Water and sanitation 1 3 9
Subtotal 3 18 85
Pillar III: Democratic governance
Global objectives Specific objectives No. of Actions
Justice 1 6 35
Security 1 2 16
Neighborhood 1 3 9
governance
Subtotal 3 11 60
Specific and crosscutting policies
Global objectives Specific objectives No. of Actions
Food security 1 4 9
Gender equality 1 7 41
Environment 1 9 35
Social protection 1 4 20
Culture and 1 3 22
communication
Urban development 1 4
Hazards and disasters 1 2 7
Land management 1 2 13
Capacity building 1 9 31
Private sector support 1 2 8
framework
Subtotal 10 46 186
Total 20 95 396
43
Annex 9
Macroeconomic Accounts
Gross Domestic Product Account
(In millions of gourdes at current prices)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
GDP 94,028 119,758 140,387 168,034 200,456 225,052 256,096 286,316 315,634 345,298
Imports 33,548 57,326 61,432 68,610 86,255 83,227 92,437 108,040 125,325 139,110
Income 127,576 177,084 201,819 236,644 286,711 308,279 348,533 394,356 440,959 484,408
Consumption 92,140 121,378 143,162 167,291 200,186 224,675 250,658 280,737 308,250 334,143
Investment 23,570 36,758 38,386 46,072 57,861 69,896 81,918 95,189 111,276 125,853
Exports 11,866 18,948 20,271 23,281 28,664 13,708 15,956 18,430 21,434 24,413
Employment 127,576 177,084 201,819 236,644 286,711 308,279 348,533 394,356 440,959 484,408
Gross Domestic Product Account (in millions of gourdes at 1986-1987 prices)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
GDP 12,968 13,015 12,557 12,783 13,079 13,469 13,967 14,526 15,107 15,711
Imports 14,757 15,225 15,063 15,449 16,160 17,219 17,673 18,727 19,637 20,051
Income 27,725 28,240 27,620 28,232 29,239 30,688 31,640 33,253 34,744 35,762
Consumption 20,514 20,691 19,921 20,359 21,162 21,882 22,253 23,185 23,792 24,103
Investment 4,390 4,526 4,381 4,443 4,541 4,922 5,126 5,262 5,470 5,538
Exports 2,821 3,023 3,318 3,430 3,536 3,885 4,261 4,806 5,482 6,121
Employment 27,725 28,240 27,620 28,232 29,239 30,688 31,640 33,253 34,744 35,762
Real GDP
growth rate
-0.3% 0.4% -3.5% 1.8% 2.3% 3.0% 3.7% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
44
Summary of Central Government Financial Transactions
(in millions of gourdes)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total income 7,941 10,919 16,326 26,860 35,909 46,336 56,275 60,920 70,798
Total domestic income 7,828 10,748 12,606 16,255 20,109 23,196 29,942 34,339 39,295
Current revenue 7,826 10,748 12,606 16,255 20,109 23,196 29,942 34,339 39,295
Domestic revenue 5,757 7,979 9,095 11,980 14,010 16,368 20,682 23,626 28,329
Customs revenue 2,069 2,769 3,511 4,275 6,099 6,828 9,260 10,713 10,966
Other current revenue 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grants 113 171 3,720 10,605 15,800 23,140 26,333 26,581 31,503
Total expenditure 11,091 15,041 19,364 27,573 37,083 45,026 59,121 66,228 76,379
Current expenditure 9,070 10,843 11,171 14,854 18,563 15,845 26,564 31,651 34,674
Wages and salaries 3,480 3,869 4,131 5,699 6,471 8,087 12,617 14,430 15,564
Operating expenses 4,270 4,475 4,582 4,151 4,862 1,165 7,515 9,563 11,372
Subsidies and transfers 768 1,446 1,166 3,992 5,552 5,329 5,607 6,099 6,002
Interest payments 552 1,053 1,292 1,012 1,678 1,264 825 1,559 1,737
Investment expenditure 2,021 4,198 8,193 12,719 18,520 29,181 32,557 34,577 41,704
Domestic 1,908 4,027 4,473 2,114 2,720 6,041 6,224 7,996 10,201
Foreign 113 171 3,720 10,605 15,800 23,140 26.333 26.581 31.503
Current balance -1,242 - 95 1,435 1,401 1,546 7,351 3,378 2,688 4,621
Overall balance -3,150 -4,122 -3,038 - 713 -1,174 1,310 -2,846 -5,308 -5,581
- - -
Overall balance excluding grants -3,263 -4,293 -6,758 -29,179 -31,889 -37,084
11,318 16,974 21,830
Financing 3,150 4,122 3,038 713 1,174 -1,310 2,846 5,308 5,581
Domestic financing 3,311 3,384 3,049 - 126 - 167 -1,758 - 410 - 910 - 910
Monetary authorities 2,897 3,645 2,903 6 -334 -1,129 0 0 0
Commercial banks -42 9 59 -47 119 -68 -410 -410 -410
Other 456 -270 87 -85 48 -561 0 -500 -500
External financing - 161 738 - 11 839 1,341 448 3,256 -1,759 -1,759
of which: Budgetary support -950 1,311 2,053 4,216
Grants 3,607 … …
Drawings 720 … …
Paris Club rescheduling 129 0 0
HIPC 531 864 0
Funding gap 7,977 8,250
Funding gap (US$) 222 229
45
Summary of Central Government Financial Transactions
(Annual variation)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total income 37.50% 49.52% 64.52% 33.69% 29.04% 21.45% 8.25% 16.21%
Total domestic income 37.30% 17.29% 28.95% 23.71% 15.35% 29.08% 14.69% 14.43%
Current revenue 37.34% 17.29% 28.95% 23.71% 15.35% 29.08% 14.69% 14.43%
Domestic revenue 38.60% 13.99% 31.72% 16.94% 16.83% 26.36% 14.23% 19.91%
Customs revenue 33.83% 26.80% 21.76% 42.67% 11.95% 35.62% 15.69% 2.36%
-
Other current income #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
100.00%
Grants 51.33% 2075.44% 185.08% 48.99% 46.46% 13.80% 0.94% 18.52%
Total expenditure 35.61% 28.74% 42.39% 34.49% 21.42% 31.30% 12.02% 15.33%
Current expenditure 19.55% 3.02% 32.97% 24.97% -14.64% 67.65% 19.15% 9.55%
Wages and salaries 11.18% 6.77% 37.96% 13.55% 24.97% 56.02% 14.37% 7.86%
Operating expenses 4.80% 2.39% -9.41% 17.13% -76.04% 545.06% 27.25% 18.92%
Subsidies and transfers 88.28% -19.36% 242.37% 39.08% -4.02% 5.22% 8.77% -1.59%
Interest payments 90.76% 22.70% -21.67% 65.81% -24.67% -34.73% 88.97% 11.41%
Investment expenditure 107.72% 95.16% 55.24% 45.61% 57.56% 11.57% 6.20% 20.61%
Domestic 111.06% 11.08% -52.74% 28.67% 122.10% 3.03% 28.47% 27.58%
Foreign 51.33% 2075.44% 185.08% 48.99% 46.46% 13.80% 0.94% 18.52%
-
Current balance -92.35% -2.37% 10.35% 375.49% -54.05% -20.43% 71.90%
1610.53%
-
Overall balance 30.86% -26.30% -76.53% 64.66% -211.58% 86.51% 5.14%
317.25%
Overall balance excluding
31.57% 57.42% 67.48% 49.97% 28.61% 33.66% 9.29% 16.29%
grants
-
Financing 30.86% -26.30% -76.53% 64.66% -211.58% 86.51% 5.14%
317.25%
Domestic financing 2.20% -9.90% -104.13% 32.54% 952.69% -76.68% 121.95% 0.00%
- -
Monetary authorities 25.82% -20.36% -99.79% 238.02% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5666.67% 100.00%
-
Commercial banks 555.56% -179.66% -353.19% -157.14% 502.94% 0.00% 0.00%
121.43%
- - -
Other -132.22% -197.70% -156.47% #DIV/0! 0.00%
159.21% 1268.75% 100.00%
- - -
External financing -101.49% 59.83% -66.59% 626.79% 0.00%
558.39% 7727.27% 154.02%
of which: Budgetary support 56.53% 105.35%
Grants
Drawings
Paris Club rescheduling
HIPC
Funding gap
46
47
Summary of Central Government Financial Transactions
(% of GDP)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total income 8.45% 9.12% 11.63% 15.98% 17.91% 20.59% 21.97% 21.28% 22.43%
Total domestic income 8.33% 8.97% 8.98% 9.67% 10.03% 10.31% 11.69% 11.99% 12.45%
Current revenue 8.32% 8.97% 8.98% 9.67% 10.03% 10.31% 11.69% 11.99% 12.45%
Domestic revenue 6.12% 6.66% 6.48% 7.13% 6.99% 7.27% 8.08% 8.25% 8.98%
Customs revenues 2.20% 2.31% 2.50% 2.54% 3.04% 3.03% 3.62% 3.74% 3.47%
Other current income 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Grants 0.12% 0.14% 2.65% 6.31% 7.88% 10.28% 10.28% 9.28% 9.98%
Total expenditure 11.80% 12.56% 13.79% 16.41% 18.50% 20.01% 23.09% 23.13% 24.20%
Current expenditure 9.65% 9.05% 7.96% 8.84% 9.26% 7.04% 10.37% 11.05% 10.99%
Wages and salaries 3.70% 3.23% 2.94% 3.39% 3.23% 3.59% 4.93% 5.04% 4.93%
Operating expenses 4.54% 3.74% 3.26% 2.47% 2.43% 0.52% 2.93% 3.34% 3.60%
Subsidies and transfers 0.82% 1.21% 0.83% 2.38% 2.77% 2.37% 2.19% 2.13% 1.90%
Interest payments 0.59% 0.88% 0.92% 0.60% 0.84% 0.56% 0.32% 0.54% 0.55%
Investment expenditure 2.15% 3.51% 5.84% 7.57% 9.24% 12.97% 12.71% 12.08% 13.21%
Domestic 2.03% 3.36% 3.19% 1.26% 1.36% 2.68% 2.43% 2.79% 3.23%
Foreign 0.12% 0.14% 2.65% 6.31% 7.88% 10.28% 10.28% 9.28% 9.98%
Current balance -1.32% -0.08% 1.02% 0.83% 0.77% 3.27% 1.32% 0.94% 1.46%
Overall balance -3.35% -3.44% -2.16% -0.42% -0.59% 0.58% -1.11% -1.85% -1.77%
Overall balance excluding - - -
-3.47% -3.58% -4.81% -6.74% -8.47% -9.70%
grants 11.39% 11.14% 11.75%
Financing 3.35% 3.44% 2.16% 0.42% 0.59% -0.58% 1.11% 1.85% 1.77%
Domestic financing 3.52% 2.83% 2.17% -0.07% -0.08% -0.78% -0.16% -0.32% -0.29%
Monetary authorities 3.08% 3.04% 2.07% 0.00% -0.17% -0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Commercial banks -0.04% 0.01% 0.04% -0.03% 0.06% -0.03% -0.16% -0.14% -0.13%
Other 0.48% -0.23% 0.06% -0.05% 0.02% -0.25% 0.00% -0.17% -0.16%
External financing -0.17% 0.62% -0.01% 0.50% 0.67% 0.20% 1.27% -0.61% -0.56%
of which: Budget support -0.42% 0.51% 0.72% 1.34%
Grants 1.41%
Drawings 0.28%
Paris Club rescheduling 0.05% 0.00% 0.00%
HIPC 0.21% 0.30% 0.00%
Funding gap 0.00% 2.79% 2.61%
Funding gap (US$)
48
Summary of Haiti Balance of Payments (millions of US dollars)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Current account - 30 - 46 - 57 114 -1 67 - 12 - 222 - 267
Current account (excluding -
- 183 - 157 - 214 - 381 - 361 - 460 - 572 - 755
grants) 165
- - - -
Trade balance -708 -783 -833 -850 -1,054
1,086 1,231 1,392 1,516
Merchandise exports 274 333 378 459 494 553 698 786 875
of which, maquila
221 278 320 397 435 491 631 713 795
- - - - - - -
Merchandise imports -983 -1,548
1,116 1,211 1,308 1,640 1,929 2,178 2,391
of which, petroleum products -157 -196 -218 -313 -397 -400 -450 -467 -473
Net services -93 -166 -204 -313 -336 -357 -400 -414 -561
Credit 164 135 133 138 197 230 290 366 295
Debit -256 -301 -337 -452 -533 -587 -690 -780 -856
Net income -13 -16 -12 -37 7 1 -4 2 12
Net current transfers 784 918 993 1,313 1,382 1,509 1,623 1,582 1,797
Net official transfers 135 137 100 328 380 428 448 350 488
Net private transfers 649 781 893 985 1,002 1,081 1,175 1,232 1,309
Capital and financial
account - 42 27 89 - 58 88 90 89 93 141
Foreign direct investment 5 14 6 26 160 80 80 80 80
Net capital flows to the public
sector -25 -3 -10 31 51 23 43 50 98
Net flows from/of the banking
3 -47 29 -76 -83 -13 -34 -37 -38
sector
Net errors and omissions -25 63 65 -40 -39 0 0 0 0
Overall balance - 72 - 19 33 56 88 157 77 - 129 - 127
Financing 72 19 - 33 - 56 - 88 - 156 - 77 - 93 - 102
Variation in reserve assets 49 21 -51 -22 -107 -199 -118 -124 -114
Variation in liabilities -8 -11 -2 9 10 21 23 23 12
Variation in arrears 31 9 20 -43 9 -45 0 0 0
Other (including HIPC debt
rescheduling) 0 0 0 0 0 67 18 8 0
Funding gap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 229
49
Monetary situation (in millions of Gourdes)
Projections
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Net external claims 8,421 13,475 12,683 18,630 24,000 30,493 35,866 41,660 47,775 54,147
Net domestic claims 28,808 38,553 44,078 49,660 51,091 51,895 54,737 59,016 63,503 67,771
Credit to the public
sector (excluding 15,229 18,700 21,097 21,159 20,118 20,118 20,118 20,118 20,118 20,118
special accounts)
Credit to central
15,219 18,611 21,401 21,322 20,570 20,124 20,124 20,124 20,124 20,124
government
Other credit to the
10 89 -303 -163 -452 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6
public sector
Credit to the private
14,512 19,365 21,142 25,609 27,019 28,399 31,241 35,520 39,778 43,845
sector
Other items - net
(including special -932 488 1,839 2,892 3,955 3,378 3,378 3,378 3,607 3,808
accounts)
M3 aggregate -
37,229 52,028 56,761 68,290 75,091 82,388 90,602 100,677 111,278 121,918
Broad money
Notes and coins in
6,652 8,443 8,685 10,547 11,159 12,018 12,982 14,285 15,630 16,905
circulation
Deposits 30,576 43,585 48,076 57,743 63,932 70,370 77,621 86,391 95,648 105,013
Gourde deposits 16,810 21,903 25,824 28,292 31,533 33,962 36,685 40,369 44,168 47,773
Dollar deposits 13,766 21,683 22,252 29,451 32,399 36,408 40,936 46,022 51,480 57,241
50
Ministry of Planning and External Cooperation (MPCE)
25, Rue Mgr Guilloux, Palais des Ministères Tel: 223-8921
Port-au-Prince, HAITI
Website: www.mpce.gouv.ht • e-mail: info@mpce.gouv.ht