(2023) Rapò final Alyans Renouvèlman Ayiti
Rezime — Alyans Renouvèlman Ayiti (HRA) te dirije pwojè Akseleratè Patenarya Diaspora (DPA), ki te finanse pa USAID/BHA, pou angaje dyaspora ayisyen an nan adrese defi imanitè nan Ayiti. Pwojè a te enplike yon konpetisyon Investor Tank kote òganizasyon dyaspora yo te prezante pwojè nan sante, agribiznis, ak abri, ak ganyan yo te resevwa finansman ak sipò.
Dekouve Enpotan
- Pwojè pilòt DPA a te montre patenarya inovatè atravè sektè lokal, dyaspora, ak prive yo.
- Pwojè a te idantifye epi sipòte pwojè ki pa gen ase finansman ki te dirije pa dyaspora nan Ayiti.
- Konpetisyon Investor Tank la te bay $150,000 a twa òganizasyon dyaspora.
- Pwojè a te fè fas ak defi ki gen rapò ak pandemi COVID-19 la ak kominikasyon ant patnè yo.
- DPA a te mete aksan sou nesesite pou ranfòse kapasite ak kominikasyon klè nan pwojè nan lavni.
Deskripsyon Konple
Akseleratè Patenarya Diaspora (DPA), ki te dirije pa Alyans Renouvèlman Ayiti (HRA) epi ki te finanse pa USAID/BHA, te vize debloke baryè pou angajman dirèk ak kominote dyaspora yo nan adrese pwoblèm imanitè nan Ayiti. Pwojè a te gen de faz: yon konpetisyon Investor Tank ak aplikasyon pwojè. Nan Faz 1, òganizasyon dyaspora yo te prezante pwojè nan sante, agribiznis, ak abri bay yon Komite Evalyasyon Teknik ak piblik la. Twa ganyan te resevwa $150,000 pou aplike pwojè yo nan Faz 2, ak HRA bay sipò konsiltatif. Seremoni Fèmti DPA a te montre rezilta pwojè yo ak leson yo te aprann yo, e li te mete aksan sou enpòtans patenarya inovatè ak ranfòse kapasite pou òganizasyon lokal yo.
Teks Konple Dokiman an
Teks ki soti nan dokiman orijinal la pou endeksasyon.
USAID.GOV
DIASPORA PARTNERSHIP ACCELERATOR,
Haiti Renewal Alliance
Final Report, August 9, 2023
DISCLAIMER This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared
independently by Haiti Renewal Alliance.
USAID.GOV 2
CONTENTS
PRO GRAM O VERVIEW 3
SUMMARY O F RESULTS 6
C HALLEN G ES 8
LESSO N S LEARN ED 9
REC O MMEN DATIO N S FO R FUTURE PRO JEC TS 10
USAID.GOV 3
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Given the ever-growing importance of advancing the localization agenda, institutional humanitarian
actors and donors find themselves at a crossroad where new approaches and partnerships must be
explored to deliver more impactful aid. Moreover, the localization agenda has served to underscore
a lack of diversity of perspectives and resources amongst institutional humanitarian actors, often to
the exclusion of non-traditional or marginalized actors.
The aim of the Diaspora Partnership Accelerator (DPA) is to unlock the barriers of direct
engagement with diaspora communities. Historically, donor’s stance towards diaspora engagement
has been top-down and “supply-driven”. USAID/BHA has actively engaged diaspora through
invitations to diaspora calls, roundtables, and outreach events, as well as, informing
diaspora’s donation practices. While important and necessary, these efforts have been largely one-
sided. This pilot adopts a “bottom-up” approach to diaspora engagement by putting diaspora in the
driver’s seat and having BHA respond to the priorities, needs, and capacities they identify. At its
core, the DPA is designed to engage the diaspora in a substantive and meaningful fashion throughout
the entirety of the programming cycle. This partnership model empowers the diaspora, in
conjunction with affected communities in their countries of origin, to identify and design solutions
for the humanitarian problems affecting their environments. The DPA was divided into two phases.
Phase 1: Investor Tank Competition
The Haiti Renewal Alliance (HRA) led the Investor Tank platform for the planning and
facilitation of three virtual pitch competitions in Health, Agribusiness and Shelter. HRA developed
objective criteria and launched an open community campaign, seeking out Haitian diaspora
organizations with existing projects in Haiti that would benefit from additional funding within the
sectors identified per USAID/BHA’ approval. A total of 56 applications were received from Diaspora
organizations and 13 finalists were selected to participate in the competition: 5 agriculture, 5 health
and 3 shelter (lower recruitment in this category) applications.
The 13 Haitian diaspora organization finalists pitched their projects virtually to a live YouTube
audience composed of global community members of the Haitian diaspora at large and a Technical
Evaluation Committee (TEC) that evaluated their project.
Finalist presentations
USAID.GOV 4
The Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC) served as judges for the competition. After each pitch,
four judges (3 from BHA, 1 from Vistant, formally PMCG, and 1 from HRA) asked questions to
learn more about each project and scored the presenters. Projects evaluations were based on 10
key indicators:
Assessment and Scope of Needs, Management, Beneficiary Engagement, Innovation,
Feasibility, Planning, Project Impact, Disaster Risk Reduction, Sustainability, and Presentation
. In
addition, community members of the Haitian diaspora were galvanized over a 3-day period and
voted for their favorite projects after the live event. The popular vote was considered for the final
selection made by the TEC. The TEC’s assessment accounted for 75% of the total score, while
the public vote counted for 25% of the total score. The maximum total score was 200 (150 points
for the TEC and 50 points for the public voting). Three applicants -CariBBrew for agribusiness, Haiti
Outreach Pwoje Espwa (H.O.P.E.) for health, and Friends of Matènwa for shelter- were selected to
receive $150,000 to work with USAID/BHA and its partners to implement their Haitian-driven
ideas in Phase II of the DPA.
The pitch competition was watched by over 15,000 viewers from around the world and had over 1.1
million impressions on social media. Hashtags such as #USAIDSavesLives and #InvestorTank2021
were used to promote the DPA event. Over 32,000 public votes were received on the voting
platform. This was the first event of its kind and offered an opportunity for communities and their
supporters to vote for their great work on the ground, also serving as a form of marketing
campaign.
Outreach
To attract a broad participation from the Haitian diaspora community for the Investor tank
Competition, HRA implemented a comprehensive diaspora outreach and communications strategy.
The campaign was designed with an innovative grass roots model to share information and to
attract new support and engage participation of the global Haitian diaspora community from Europe,
Africa, North America, and the Caribbean. The campaign also served to convene, connect and
broker additional financial leads via promotion for the projects beyond the competition. The success
of this community engagement approach was also due to the trusted reputation of HRA and its wide
USAID.GOV 5
reach, along with its diaspora partners, and selection of the competition’s host, the popular Haitian
community radio personality, Carel Pedre.
The outreach strategy involved the creation and dissemination of various outreach materials,
including several short promotional videos and pitches from candidate organizations disseminated via
social media platforms, such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and twitter. Additionally, traditional
media channels such as TV, radio, and print media were employed to further amplify the campaign
across socioeconomic groups.
Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC) in the Investor Tank with Host Carel Pedre
The use of both a TEC and the popular vote to tally the final scores was important in
order to address challenges around community trust and it allowed for a more transparent and
objective review and selection of projects. The program was also presented in both English and
Creole to further engage local communities being served (see images from the Investor Tank
Competition below).
DPA Winners’ Announcement
USAID.GOV 6
Phase II
Phase 2 was led and implemented by USAID/BHA, Vistant, and Miyamoto intl. During the second
phase, HRA transitioned into an advisory role for the project, as needed. Prior to this transition,
HRA provided formal recommendations to the incoming partners to ensure more nuanced aspects
of the project as it relates to diasporas were incorporated in Phase 2. Our goal was to support
the three winning organizations. HRA provided guidance and support to these organizations,
leveraging its expertise to maximize the experience, overall impact and success of the DPA projects.
We attended all of the meetings, ad hoc calls, troubleshooted diaspora issues and communications,
where required.
DPA Closing Ceremony
HRA led the planning and logistics for the DPA Project Closing Ceremony held in person at the
Embassy of Haiti in Washington, DC. This event provided an opportunity for project participants,
funders, and implementers to showcase their project results, and share valuable insights with
participants including diaspora organizations, the Haitian Ambassador, private sector, and other
esteemed guests. The event served as a platform for celebrating achievements and discussing lessons
learned from the DPA. The event drew an attendance of nearly 55 in-person participants and was
video recorded to be broadcasted at a later time in August 2023 via Investortank.org. See below
some pictures from the DPA Closing Ceremony.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Forging New Partnerships for Unmet Need
The DPA pilot was a great opportunity to showcase and operationalize innovative partnerships
across local, diaspora and private sectors. It provided new ways for BHA to do business with
different actors, such as private sector and diaspora organizations, in order to facilitate their
participation in the government solicitations and to secure funding through innovative mechanisms
and strategies that address localization priorities. The project also served as a vehicle to identify the
plethora of underfunded existing projects and provide financial support for ensuring sustainability
and scalability/expansion of impactful initiatives spearheaded by the diaspora working in Haiti.
Fostering Sustainability of Local Partners Beyond Aid
In the second phase, the DPA recognized the importance of training and capacity building for
effective project management and financial allocation. By offering training, the project enhanced the
skills and capabilities of diaspora organizations, leading to improved operational efficiency. The DPA
USAID.GOV 7
improved short-term outcomes by equipping organizations with administrative capacity, operational
skills and knowledge necessary for successful projects. It also allowed some mapping of existing
humanitarian assistance projects, their gaps and needs across sectors. Overall, the DPA
successfully empowered local organizations by actively engaging diaspora communities and affected
communities in their countries of origin. This approach enabled nonprofits to play a significant role
in identifying and designing solutions for humanitarian challenges due to climate change and other
disasters for their respective environments.
Creating Innovative Funding Mechanisms for Nontraditional Actors
Investor Tank Competition: The DPA’s investor tank competition awarded $150,000 to three
diaspora organizations with winning project ideas in agribusiness, health, and shelter. This financial support directly benefited diaspora organizations operating in these sectors, allowing them to
implement innovative ideas, expand their programs, and make a positive impact on the Haitian
community. The DPA provided new funding and support for scaling up existing projects, which had a
direct impact on three nonprofit organizations in Haiti. Through financial assistance and access to
resources, diaspora nonprofits were able to expand their programs and increase their impact within
the communities they serve. It successfully established teaming/partnership opportunities with a
traditional USAID prime, leveraging the extensive diaspora network of nonprofits across different
regions. This collaboration provided Haitian nonprofits with valuable partnerships, additional
resources, and expertise to implement projects and address pressing societal challenges. (i.e.
Miyamoto and Friends of Matènwa supported capacity building in the construction sector).
Despite the complex local context and implementing the project during multiple disasters, the DPA
achieved significant accomplishments, including the successful implementation of the investor tank
competition and the selection of three winning projects. The project's ability to captivate a global
audience and engage over 32,000 viewers showcases its impact and potential for future success. In
addition, HRA was able to complete all deliverables on time and on budget without any delays and
extensions.
CHALLENGES
The project faced several challenges throughout its implementation. Firstly, the implementation of
the investor tank was challenging during COVID-19 pandemic. The investor tank event
competition was supposed to take place before an in-person live audience. However, due to C
ovid-19, it was changed to a virtual event. Organizing an event of this magnitude online was
challenging because of the global nature of the competition and the world’s growing use of digital
programming. To face these challenges, we had to procure the services of Sypremelab, a company
with experience in the IT environment (virtual event) to assist in organizing the virtual event
platform flawlessly. Since none of the finalists had ever participated in such a competition, HRA held
various coaching sessions for the finalists to ensure competencies for both the technological
platform and the business competition. For the finalists as well as the judges, we provided ongoing
feedback during multiple rehearsal sessions, assisted in formatting presentations, as well as overall
coordination of the business competition, TEC criteria and support for the program delivery. The
USAID.GOV 8
success of the Phase I competition was a testimony of the positive multiple collaborations and
overall coordination and implementation by HRA.
Operational challenges stemmed from a misunderstanding amongst the winning diaspora groups
of HRA's role In the DPA second phase focused on project implementation. Recipients initially
assumed that HRA was there to provide ongoing operational support instead of the advisory role
. Due to proactive outreach to organizations, HRA clarified its role, however, it was much later
towards the end of the project. This represented a risk for HRA and its positive reputation in the
community. A better understanding of HRA's advisory role from the beginning and communication
of this would have been helpful in avoiding this confusion. Secondly, the phase 2 kickoff meeting
failed to explicitly state the roles of all partners. As a result, the benefits of the program were not
fully realized until later in the project and HRA’s intervention as Phase 2 advisors was very beneficial.
Conducting a capacity and need assessment of project implementer in the planning process
could have helped address this issue.
Compliance with USAID's communication guidelines and standards posed another challenge.
Ensuring consistency and adherence to branding, messaging, and formatting requirements required
careful attention. Additionally, not having all the necessary information at the onset of the project,
such as the logo and website name and design, caused delays and complications.
The approval process for the development of the DPA website was another obstacle. Multiple levels
of review and approval required by USAID communications led to delays and necessitated rethinking
of the website resulting in additional hours and increases in budget/work for HRA and the vendor.
To mitigate this in the future, it is important to allocate more time for the approval process when
considering the co-creation of a USAID project-associated branding/website requirements.
Aligning the priorities and objectives of diaspora organizations, local communities, and local municipality authorities proved to be another challenge. Security issues and limited access to
essential resources in the country further complicated project implementation and caused delays. Effective coordination and communication among stakeholders were crucial for successful project implementation.
Overall, the project overestimated the administrative capacity of the organizations. Building capacity within diaspora organizations and local communities was a hurdle. Training and technical skill
development required significant time and resources. Some organizations lacked the necessary
technical skills and equipment to create visually appealing communication content to showcase their
project accomplishments.
LESSONS LEARNED
The DPA highlighted how successful partnerships and collaborations with different partners can create greater impact in the humanitarian sector. While the project faced various challenges, the
responses to these challenges were addressed through clarification of roles, intervention by HRA,
and open dialogue and communication. Others highlighted the need for upfront surveys and involving
recipients in project planning. It also emphasized the importance of allocating sufficient time for the
approval process, effective coordination among stakeholders, and capacity-building initiatives.
USAID.GOV 9
Overall, the project's results were influenced by these challenges, leading to adjustments and
learnings throughout the implementation process. Good communication and transparency to help
manage expectations, particularly, as it relates to the USAID procurement process is required for
future initiatives. For example, the winners were operating under the impression that USAID would
hand them a check for $150,000 to implement their project. It was not well understood that they
would be required to go through the USAID procurement process (e.g. scope of work and
contract). This posed a risk for their project operations and unfortunately set the tone for some of
their challenges due to financial plans made on the assumption rather than facts about the funding
process.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE PROJECTS
The DPA intended to turn traditional partnership dynamics on its head and put new, innovative, and
local actors in the driver's seat. The DPA was designed to create a dynamic in which diaspora
partners were not simply executing the vision of donors or implementing partners; rather, the goal
was that USAID/BHA and Miyamoto adjust to effectively leverage the skills and assets of diaspora
partners. While this is a shift in paradigm, the vision is to foster greater localization, which is
currently not sufficiently realized with traditional partners. To truly achieve this, overcoming capacity
constraints and implementing effective training programs are essential, but not enough for achieving
sustainable project outcomes. Working with new partners also requires a new mindset to be able to
pivot into bolder models of engagement for greater impact. Should USAID/BHA decide to
implement such project again, we would recommend the following:
1. Encourage a new mindset for future strategic policies, operations and planning including partner
feasibility assessments beyond funding usual suspects. Change cannot occur if the expectation is
to approach new models by using the same actors and within old ways of operating in the
humanitarian sector.
2. Clarify the role and responsibility of each partner from the beginning taking traditional power
structures into consideration.
3. Diaspora-led and supported implementing partnership model is warranted to intervene in
troubleshooting and for overall understanding of needs. Too often many Haiti projects are in the
name of Haiti, but not intentional about being led by Haiti.
4. Using the novel mechanisms such as IDS to meet the growing gaps and needs of the field.
Establish more flexible platforms to fund and leverage numerous existing portfolios that are
otherwise underfunded due to inefficiencies of starting and funding new pilot projects. Or
instead of funding traditional actors that often do not benefit, link, bridge or engage local
community initiatives. This is perhaps one of the greatest losses for the field.
5. Project launch: Given the small amount of funds, a larger lump payment upfront should be
allocated for project startup. Streamline administrative process for a more efficient process to
allow the project implementation to start soon after awards/ announcement.
6. Establish clear mechanisms for information sharing regarding the procurement process, including
differences in vehicles, grants vs contracts/sub awards criteria and limitations. Most seasoned
USAID.GOV 10
contractors struggle with these processes let alone new actors and small businesses not familiar
with all the regulations.
7. Design realistic projects with sector focused pre-interviews to shape the needs of the SOW. Of
note, diaspora projects are provided far less funding with at times increased expectations and
outputs compared to resources and deliverables often seen in traditional Prime awards.
8. Assist the winners in developing a sustainable planning strategy. This will ensure that projects are
not often left without sustainable features to apply these learnings in subsequent funding to test
success.
9. Eliminate viscosity in doing work with small businesses. Recognize that diaspora organizations
are small businesses often marginalized despite their technical expertise and experience as
consultants across every sector of the HA and development landscape. The inability to identify
project and funding mechanisms to capture this expertise continues to be a shortcoming for the
field evidenced by the growing local disparities, increased challenges and ineffective use of aid
resulting in harm for the affected people.
Overall, the DPA confirmed what we already know that it is possible to establish innovative
collaborative mechanisms given the right partners. Despite numerous obstacles, the success of this
initiative further highlighted the unique value-add and capacities of local actors and diaspora to fill
gaps across the humanitarian field. More importantly, it demonstrated the ability of small
organizations/businesses to rise to the occasion when given the opportunity. With the growing
global need for funding, is it critical for USAID/BHA to pivot past old ways of funding humanitarian
initiatives in a siloed manner as opposed to leveraging innovative aid actors, such as diaspora
organizations, to fuel ongoing recovery efforts and local operations. A lack of innovative approaches
and actors has fostered a lack of global trust in the field and is a major barrier to addressing
localization priorities, partnerships and measurable impact .