Medam ak Tifi nan Ayiti & Rekonstriksyon: Adrese ak Anpeche Vyolans Sèksis - Rapò Evalyasyon

-1- Report No: AUS2645 Republic of Haiti Women and Girls in Haiti & Reconstruction: Addressing and Preventing Gender based Violence Evaluation Report April 2013 LCSPP LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized -2- Standard D isclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findi ngs, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Di rectors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgm ent on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of thi s work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its wor k and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. F or permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978 - 750 - 8400, fax 978 - 750 - 4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, Th e World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202 - 522 - 2422, e - mail pubrights@worldbank.org. -3- W OMEN AND G IRLS IN H AITI ’ S R ECONSTRUCTION : A DDRESSING AND P REVENTING G ENDER -B ASED V IOLENCE E VALUATION R EPORT I. E XECUTIVE S UMMARY AND M AIN F INDINGS This qualitative evaluation examines the LCSPP-sponsored project, Women and Girls in Haiti’s Reconstruction: Assessing and Preventing Gender-Based Violence. Implemented from September 2011 to September 2012 by two non-governmental organizations, U.S.-based MADRE and Haiti-based KOFAVIV, the project used a human rights-based approach to prevent and respond to gender-based violence. The evaluation used mixed methods, combining a desk review of project reports; interviews with program beneficiaries, community outreach workers, and key program personnel; focus group discussions with community outreach workers; and a survey conducted in and around four camps for internally-displaced persons. On the basis of this evidence, the evaluation makes the following key findings, in relation to the three major program components: 1. Public education to promote awareness and prevention of SGBV : MADRE and KOFAVIV met and surpassed their goals under this component. MADRE and KOFAVIV successfully distributed safety-enhancing goods to residents in the five camps included in the project, with beneficiaries and community outreach workers reporting enhanced safety, knowledge, and capacity for responding to SGBV. Evidence collected from beneficiaries, outreach workers, staff, and an on-site survey also suggests that the two organizations successfully raised awareness of SGBV and its prevention through public awareness events, radio broadcasts, and training sessions. These data also suggest that KOFAVIV and its support program are well known in camps and community, especially among women. 2. Institutional strengthening to enhance resources and outreach in relation to SGBV: MADRE and KOFAVIV met their goals under this component. Evidence collected from beneficiaries, outreach workers, and staff suggests that MADRE and KOFAVIV successfully trained KOFAVIV outreach workers and that they demonstrated enhanced capacity to do their work. Evidence also suggests that MADRE successfully provided technical assistance to KOFAVIV. 3. Enhancing Women’s Civic Participation for addressing GBV : MADRE and KOFAVIV achieved and exceeded their goals under this component. KOFAVIV demonstrated improved leadership, networking, and advocacy and made significant contributions to SGBV-related law reform efforts. -4- The evaluation highlights the following lessons learned and makes the following recommendations:  Organizations that are based in the communities they serve, and which draw their personnel and outreach workers from those communities, have knowledge, legitimacy, and experience that can make them especially successful in post- disaster settings, provided they are given sufficient resources, capacity-building, and assistance from one or more partner organizations.  Recommendation: Capacity-building should be transformed into accompaniment wherever possible.  Recommendation: Accountability structures, such as a “general assembly of members” or a community involvement board could enhance accountability, but should not be imposed by funders.  Recommendation: Funding should be made available to support existing coordination and collaboration structures set up by grassroots organizations, or to create them where they do not yet exist.  While the distribution of targeted, gender-sensitive goods can have a positive impact, sustainable change will come when women achieve financial autonomy and the ability to leave the IDP camps.  Recommendation: Programs focusing on prevention and response to SGBV could be fruitfully integrated into, or closely coordinated with, programming that catalyzes economic opportunities for women and emphasizes real housing solutions.  Recommendation: The Bank’s housing programming should be fully gender-sensitive and should include specific and concrete guidelines for the government of Haiti to use when monitoring implementation of housing projects by NGO partners.  While there is a growing body of evidence supporting the design of post-disaster SGBV programming, attention to the design and implementation of monitoring and evaluation frameworks should be brought to bear where possible in order to document and create new knowledge.  Recommendation: Include rigorous monitoring and evaluation components wherever possible, but instead of simply imposing them on grantees, use the opportunity to pair the relevant organizational staff with WB personnel who are experts in M&E methods.  Recommendation: Draw lessons from what worked and what did not work in the program and encapsulate those learnings in concrete organizational tools such as an inventory of skills or capacity assessments of outreach workers. This will help managers ensure that the community outreach -5- workers have the skills required to be an effective community agent and are benefitting from capacity building and training efforts.  The backing of the World Bank is an incredibly powerful tool for a grassroots organization. It should be carefully, consciously, and strategically deployed to further the ends of the grant.  To ensure that these new dialogues are sustainable, coordination structures or consultation processes between grassroots NGOs, NGOs associated with the Haitian feminist movement, and government actors could be explored and strengthened where feasible. -6- II. T ABLE OF A BBREVIATIONS The Bank World Bank FR Final Report from MADRE to LCSPP, World Bank FGD Focus Group Discussion IACHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IR1-3 First/Second/Third Interim Report from MADRE to LCSPP, World Bank IDP Internally Displaced Person KOFAVIV Komisyon Fanm Viktim pou Viktim (Commission of Women Victims for Victims) LCSPP Poverty, Gender, and Equity Unit of the Latin America and the Caribbean Region of the World Bank MCFDF Ministère à la Condition Féminine et aux Droits des Femmes (Ministry on the Status and Rights of Women) NGO Nongovernmental Organization SGBV Sexual and Gender-Based Violence UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees VAW Violence Against Women -7- III. T ABLE OF C ONTENTS I. Executive Summary and Main Findings ................................................................................................................3 II. Table of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................................6 III. Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................7 IV. Project Background ..........................................................................................................................................8 V. Project Purpose and Overview ...........................................................................................................................10 VI. Evaluation ......................................................................................................................................................11 A. Public Education to Promote Awareness and Prevention of SGBV ..............................................................11 1. MADRE and KOFAVIV Successfully Distributed Safety-Enhancing Goods ...............................................11 2. MADRE and KOFAVIV Successfully Raised Awareness of SGBV and its Prevention Through Public Awareness Events, Radio Broadcasts, and Training ..........................................................................................13 B. Institutional Strengthening to Enhance GBV Resources and Outreach .......................................................21 1. MADRE and KOFAVIV Successfully Trained KOFAVIV Outreach Workers ...............................................21 2. Outreach Workers Demonstrated Enhanced Capacity .............................................................................23 3. MADRE Successfully Provided Technical Assistance to KOFAVIV ............................................................24 C. Enhancing Women’s Civic Par ticipation for addressing GBV .............................................................................26 1. KOFAVIV Demonstrated Improved Leadership, Networking, and Advocacy and has Made Significant contributions to SGBV-Related Law Reform Efforts ..........................................................................................26 VII. Recommendations .........................................................................................................................................29 VIII. Annexes A. Annex 1: Evaluation Methodology B. Annex 2: Interview Guides a. Guide to Interviews with Beneficiaries b. Guide to Interviews with KOFAVIV Workers c. Guide to Interviews with Key Personnel C. Annex 3: Focus Group Guide: KOFAVIV Workers D. Annex 4: Survey Materials a. Survey Instrument b. Survey: Key Findings -8- IV. P ROJECT B ACKGROUND The 7.0 magnitude earthquake that hit Haiti on January 12, 2010 was enormous by any scale, but its impacts were gravely intensified by the country’s poor infrastructure, unregulated building sector, intense overcrowding, environmental degradation and feeble emergency response capacity. An estimated 200,000 to 300,000 people were killed, more than one million were injured, and over a million were left homeless. The impacts were concentrated in the capital city and its outskirts , hobbling government agencies, the civil service corps, and Haiti’s partners in the international community. These losses were magnified for poor Haitian women, who already shouldered the great burdens of caring for children, the elderly, and those with medical needs; securing the family’s basic needs such as food and water; and providing emotional sustenance to family members in need. In a country marked by severe inequalities along lines of wealth, class, education, and gender, women’s status varies gre atly depending on class, wealth, and education. Haitian women as a group were underrepresented in formal governmental structures even before the earthquake. Although Haiti has ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence Against Women (“Convention of Belem do Para”), Haiti has failed to bring its law and practice i nto line with many of their central guarantees . Despite this, t he Haitian women’s movement, which had been very active since the mid - 1990s, had scored some significant victories in the years leading up to the earthquake. Most relevant for this report were the establishment of the Ministère à la Condition Féminine et aux Droits des Femmes (MCFDF, Ministry on the Status and Rights of Women) and the amendment of the Haitian penal code provisions concerning rape. Regarding the latter, in 2005, the Haitian Penal Code provision concerning rape was amended, transforming what was a n “ offense against morals” into a serious criminal matter — a reclassification equivalent to transforming a misdemeanor into a felony . 1 Research carried out before the earthquake established that Haitian women experienced sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) at alarming rates. The 2005 Demographic and Health Survey found that 27 percent of women had experienced physical violence and 22 percent had experienced sexual violence at some point in their lifetime. 2 Similarly, Athena Kolbe and Royce Hutson reported in 2006 that, based on a randomized survey, approximately 35,000 individuals in the Port - au - Prince area alone had experienced sexual assault during a two - year period. 3 Sexual violence h as often been used as a tool of political repression, as reports demonstrated during the periods of de facto rule following the ouster of President Aristide in the 1990s and mid - 2000s. 4 Soon after the earthquake, community-based organizations began to report that incidents of rape and other forms of sexual violence were rapidly increasing , especially in the camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs). These reports were at first case - based, drawing on the documentation of front - line women’s rights advocat es and service providers like grantee KOFAVIV itself, which reported 250 cases in only 15 camps within the first five months following the earthquake. 5 NYU’s Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) summarizes additional case - based evidence as fo llows: -9- The PNH recorded 253 cases of rape from January to October 2010. GHESKIO likewise identified 239 sexual abuses cases from January to September 2010. This represented an increase of 2.7 and 7.0 cases per month from 2009 monthly levels, respectively. Human Rights Watch has nevertheless criticized official PNH statistics as inconsistent during the post-earthquake period. . . Case records from SOFA, Kay Fanm, and those collected through the Concertation Nationale suggest a decline from 2009 to 2010, although this is likely the result of weak reporting structures in the months immediately following the earthquake. Records kept by the PNH’s Unité de Lutte Contre la Violence Faite aux Femmes nevertheless indicate that reported incidents of rape and resulting legal cases spiked in May 2010 to rates higher than the pre-earthquake levels. . . 6 These reports were later supported by population-based data and in-depth mixed-methods studies. Kolbe and Muggah reported in March 2012 that those living in informal settlements were at higher risk of sexual assault than those living in the community at large , and that the incidence of such assaults were rising even as late as February 2012. 7 NYU’s CNRGJ reported in January 2012 that it had documented increased vulnerab ility among young women living in IDP camps in small households with difficulties accessing food, water, and sanitation. 8 The lack of privacy in the IDP camps also left women more vulnerable to sexual assault because the frequently have to sleep, shower, o r relieve themselves in public and/or unlit areas. Human Rights Watch identified grave consequences for pregnant girls and women who experienced pregnancy and birth in IDP camps, often as a result of rape. 9 UNHCR found that survival sex — a form of sexual ex ploitation experienced by young women in particular — was occurring in many camps as women and girls found themselves economically bereft and physically vulnerable. 10 This nexus of vulnerability is added to already - existing barriers to accessing justice for H aitian women victims of SGBV (see figure 1 below). 11 The LSPP - sponsored project Women and Girls in Haiti’s Reconstruction: Assessing and Preventing Gender - Based Violence was designed to respond to this nexus of vulnerability and dire consequences for women living in five IDP camps of Port - au - Prince . FIGURE 1 -10- V. P ROJECT P URPOSE AND O VERVIEW Women and Girls in Haiti’s Reconstruction: Assessing and Preventing Gender -Based Violence is based on evidence that women and girls experience situated and contextually specific vulnerabilities to violence, which are exacerbated and magnified during crises. 12 Recognizing that the most effective interventions in such settings are those that draw on existing organizations, networks, and knowledge, the project supported a community-based Haitian women’s rights organization, KOFAVIV, and its sister organization MADRE, based in the United States, as they worked to prevent and respond to SGBV in five IDP camps in and near Port-au-Prince. MADRE is a New York- based organization that works for women’s human rights through partnerships with community- based women’s organizations in many parts of the world (Final Report: 1 (hereinafter “FR”)). Established by survivors of rape, KOFAVIV had served grassroots women in the Port-au-Prince region through peer counseling, individual psycho-social support, and emergency medical care since 2005 (FR: 1). When the earthquake destroyed KOFAVIV’s Women’s Center, the founders joined forces with MADRE to re -establish the Center and attend to the emergency needs, as well as the long-term goals and aspirations of grassroots women (FR: 1). Since many of KOFAVIV’s members were living in the IDP camps, KOFAVIV’s community-based model — in which rape survivors are empowered to work as community outreach workers, peer educators and counselors, and human rights monitors — was perfectly fit for the purpose of responding to and preventing SGBV in the IDP camps. In turn, MADRE’s partnership model — through which MADRE and partner organization staff join forces to support and accompany institutional growth and increased effectiveness — was also well designed for the post-earthquake context. In a setting where many INGOs have been seen as inadequately consultative, unaccountable to Haitian communities, and at times out of touch with grassroots Haitian efforts, this kind of mutual commitment and partnership is striking. 13 It is also especially important in the context of vulnerability along gender lines, the response to which many analyses conclude have not been adequately mainstreamed into the disaster response and rebuilding process in Haiti. 14 The LCSPP sets out the project’s purpose as follows: The Poverty, Gender, and Equity Unit of the Latin America and the Caribbean Region of the World Bank (LCSPP) received a RSR grant to implement activities with an overarching development objective to contribute and immediately respond to ensuring the safety of women and girls in Haiti and addressing the extreme increases in GBV in post-earthquake Haiti through support for proven community-based interventions. 15 The project “focused on violence against women and girls by male perpetrators, including physical and sexual violence both inside and outside the home.” 16 The project combined public education to promote awareness and prevention of SGBV; institutional strengthening to enhance resources and outreach in relation to SGBV; enhancing women’s civic participation for addressing SGBV; and project coordination, monitoring, and evaluation. The total budget of the intervention was $581,000. This evaluation examines the first three components of the project. -11- VI. E VALUATION This section presents an overview of each project component followed by findings based on relevant evidence from the desk and field research conducted for this evaluation. See Annex 1 for a discussion of the methods used in this qualitative evaluation. This section will not comprehensively summarize project activities since those are documented in progress and final reports submitted to the World Bank by MADRE and KOFAVIV. Instead, the emphasis will be on the specific findings and evidence for those findings. Because the focus is on presenting evidence of results and outcomes, not all project activities will be described. A. P UBLIC E DUCATION TO P ROMOTE A WARENESS AND P REVENTION OF SGBV This component will support two sets of activities designed to contribute to GBV prevention: (i) Distribution of safety-enhancing goods and (ii) violence prevention public education and outreach through public awareness events, radio broadcasts, and wide distribution of materials. The component was designed based on the understanding that “distribution of supplies including whistles, health and hygiene supplies, solar flashlights and lanterns, cell phones and tarps increase the health and security of women and youth in an IDP camp setting and can have the single greatest impact on reducing sexual violence.” MADRE and KOFAVIV have provided in - depth reports on the specific supplies they distributed in the camps in their progress and final reports. Briefly, KOFAVIV and MADRE decided to focus their project activities on five of the 22 camps where KOFAVIV maintained an active presence: Champ de Mars, Ti Plaz Kazo/Tabarre, Croix des Pres, Terrain de Golf, and CDSM/Martissant (FR: 3). The criteria used to choose these five camps were: location, active presence of KOFAVIV community outreach workers, and relatively lower-level security risks for KOFAVIV outreach workers and staff (FR: 3-4). Within these camps, beneficiaries of direct program services were those who were identified as being “in greatest need” by KOFAVIV outreach workers by nature of belonging to one or more of the following groups: women who have experience of or who are vulnerable to sexual violence, women caretakers, and sexually exploited youth (FR: 4-5). When the Champ de Mars camp was evacuated during the course of the project, KOFAVIV outreach workers found ways to meet regularly with the relocated residents and continued to conduct trainings (FR: 31). 1. MADRE AND KOFAVIV S UCCESSFULLY D ISTRIBUTED S AFETY -E NHANCING G OODS During the course of the project, MADRE shipped $144,287.28 worth of goods to the KOFAVIV Women’s Center for distribution to targeted women in the chosen camps (FR: 10). These goods included whistles, medical sup plements such as prenatal vitamins, health and hygiene supplies, solar flashlights, lanterns, cell phones, tarps, and rape kits. These items were chosen as most likely to respond to the urgent needs of women vulnerable to SGBV (IR2: 4). A total of 7,087 wo men and children received goods from these distributions. Most of these distributions took place at the KOFAVIV Women’s Center, but some smaller, more targeted distributions occurred inside the camps (IR2: 5; FR: 10-11). In many instances, trainings or focus groups were held relating to the items being distributed (IR2: 5). When sexual health items were distributed, for example, KOFAVIV outreach workers conducted trainings on -12- sexual and reproductive health (FR: 11). These trainings were conducted using a rights-based approach so that women receiving goods had an empowering framework in which to understand the distributions and KOFAVIV’s work (IR2: 6 -7). Human rights education and awareness raising encouraged women to view the distributions as part of an anti-violence organizing effort rather than simply as humanitarian relief. KOFAVIV and MADRE report that these distributions were a success, in part because KOFAVIV adjusted plans for distributions when security concerns arose about handing out goods in the camps (IR1: 9; FR: 10-11, 30). Instead of implementing large-scale distributions within the camps, KOFAVIV outreach workers drew up lists of women who fit the selection criteria and then invited them to come to the Women’s Center at a specific time and date ( id. ). Data from interviews with program beneficiaries 17 overwhelmingly support the finding that KOFAVIV and MADRE successfully distributed safety-enhancing goods to vulnerable women in the camps. Interview data also underscore the wisdom of the distribution approach adopted by KOFAVIV. Eighteen of the 23 recipients said explicitly that they were satisfied with the distribution process (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A8, B1, B2, B3, B5, C1, D1, D2, D3, D4, E3, E4, E5) , and not one said they were dissatisfied with the process. These positive results were spread across the four camps. Eight recipients explained why they were satisfied with the process (B1, B2, C1, D1, D4, E3, E4, E5) ; of these, seven said that they were pleased that distributions were achieved “with disc ipline” or “without disorder,” the opposite of reports from distributions soon after the earthquake that were marred by confusion, chaos and even violence ( id., except E5) . 18 One recipient volunteered that she was happy to receive training in direct connect ion with the distributions (E5) . Only one recipient said that she was not satisfied — for a reason external to the distribution process — she would have preferred to receive a job in lieu of goods (D5) . In addition to responding to emergency needs, KOFAVIV and MADRE designed the distributions to enhance safety within the camps. To that end, they provided whistles, flashlights, and lamps for safety (IR2: 4). In connection with the dissemination of these items, outreach workers provided training on how to use them as alert mechanisms, teaching women to sound their whistles if they were in danger as well as how to respond should they hear someone else calling for help. Two of the women specifically volunteered that they appreciated being taught how to use the whistles and lights as an alert system (D2, D4) . Outreach workers who participated in the Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) explained how they ensured the smooth conduct of distributions (1, 3, 5, B, C, D 19 ). As one worker explained, before distributions, the outreach workers drew up lists of those targeted for distributions (people who come to KOFAVIV for assistance, pregnant women, etc.), then informed security agents or camp committee members of the planned distribution, and then invited those identified to stand in an orderly line (D). Many of the workers expressed satisfaction with the distributions, calling them disciplined and successful because people who needed things received them (1, 3, 5, B, C, D). On the other hand, a few outreach workers expressed chagrin that there was never enough to satisfy people’s immense needs , and regretted that they had to field criticism from the community in this regard (A, C, F). In light of the intensely deprived nature of the IDP camps, this comment says much more about the overall humanitarian response than the -13- MADRE/KOFAVIV project. It does, however, suggest a recommendation addressed below concerning the wisdom of coordinating emergency distributions with livelihood interventions. Key personnel echoed many of these findings and added insights concerning the distributions and their impact from their perspective as project managers. Eramithe Delva explained that KOFAVIV was satisfied that they were able to get security items like whistles and flashlights into the camps, but that the amounts were always going to be insufficient given the nature of the camps and the size of the program. As Malya Villard-Appolon explained, the distributions could soothe misery, but not solve problems. However, she also underscored that by targeting young women at risk of sexual exploitation, KOFAVIV was effectively obviating the need for multiple acts of sexual exchange: “If we are able to distribute sandals to 300 -400 girls who would have sex for a pair of sandals, we prevent them from exchanging sex for those things. It used to be that they would have to sleep with a man in order to get shoes for themselves or their children.” Ms. Delva also noted that the shift to office distributions allowed KOFAVIV to avoid some trouble that had arisen in some camps with committee structures, which insisted on conducting distributions themselves. Ms. Villard-Appolon observed that the in-house distributions also allowed KOFAVIV to make productive use of time spent waiting. Instead of wasting time standing in a line, beneficiaries participated in trainings and awareness-raising activities while in the office to pick up goods. This was not only a time-saving device, Ms. Villard-Appolon observed, it was also a way of raising consciousness and of “showing people we respect them.” Such respect is crucial, she explained, since it’s important that “one protects and looks after the other; we have to live together. So we motivate people, teach them to live together.” While most of the goods were distributed to residents of the five targeted camps, Ms. Delva explained that where there were urgent needs, some goods had been reallocated to other camps. Ms. Villard-Appolon explained that this was especially true for specialty items like crutches, prenatal medicines, and surgical gloves, the latter of which were donated to the General Hospital to use with post-rape treatment, since victims themselves were often asked for money to buy gloves. Ms. Delva explained that KOFAVIV consulted with a doctor concerning how best to distribute the specialty items such as prenatal vitamins and nurses conducted trainings in conjunction with the distribution of those items. 2. MADRE AND KOFAVIV S UCCESSFULLY R AISED A WARENESS OF SGBV AND ITS P REVENTION T HROUGH P UBLIC A WARENESS E VENTS , R ADIO B ROADCASTS , AND T RAINING In addition to the training activities that outreach workers conducted with vulnerable populations in the camps, MADRE and KOFAVIV collaborated on a broader public awareness campaign concerning the prevention and treatment of SGBV. MADRE provided capacity-building and technical assistance in the preparation and roll- out of KOFAVIV’s campaign against SGBV in November 2011 (FR: 11). This consisted of human rights education and training on awareness- raising in IDP camps ( id. ). KOFAVIV then conducted four sets of training events: in November 2011, December 2011, April/May 2012, and June/July/August 2012 (FR: 11). In addition, KOFAVIV organized major events in November 2011 (marking the kick-off of the campaign and commemoration of International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women), December 10 (to commemorate Human Rights Day), January 12 (anniversary of the earthquake) -14- April 3 (National Day of the Haitian Woman), and May 27 (Haitian Mother’s Day) (FR: 11 -12). These events included three days of activities from November 23-25, culminating in a march and public rally in Champ de Mars on November 25 th , as well as coordinated public service announcements on December 10 (FR: 12). In conjunction with these events, KOFAVIV outreach workers conducted information sessions in all five of the camps aimed at sensitizing communities to the existence, meaning, and rights protections related to SGBV, as well as the support services available to victims, and the existence of KOFAVIV’s tel ephone hotline number (FR: 12). Key messages conveyed via these activities included:  SGBV is a human rights violation and the government of Haiti has specific obligations to prevent, punish, and ensure redress for victims  Victims should act quickly (within 72 hours of an attack) to obtain medical assistance and a certificate  Victims have a right to redress, can make a complaint to the police, and have a right to see action taken in their cases  Victims should be treated with respect and must not be stigmatized by society or medical, judicial, or other government personnel  Accompaniment, psycho-social services, and legal assistance are available with KOFAVIV’s help  SGBV can take many forms — sexual, physical, psychological and economic  Women and girls can act to protect themselves; men and boys can act to prevent SGBV  Active community mobilization is needed to end SGBV in Haiti  KOFAVIV has a 24-hour SGBV hotline that can be accessed for free by dialing 572 Specific details about the various media events, media training for outreach workers, and festival activities can be found in the interim and final reports. Perhaps most important here is the fact that this work was done in the same empowering way that KOFAVIV’s other work is done: grassroots outreach workers formed a KOFAVIV media committee, which coordinated public service announcements, media coverage of campaign events, and press conferences (FR: 12). In addition to scheduled events and commemorations, the KOFAVIV leadership and media committee seized the opportunity to maximize messaging when several rape cases in which it had assisted moved toward trial during the summer of 2012, hosting a press conference at the Criminal Court of Port-au-Prince ( id. ). Evidence collected for this evaluation supports — but cannot prove — a finding that these awareness-raising activities were effective. No baseline data were collected for this project, making before/after intervention assessment impossible. To get a non-scientific sense of whether the key messages had been received in and near the camps, the evaluation team worked with Haitian research assistants to conduct a survey of 122 people in and around the four remaining camps in August 2012. The survey instrument was based on the Haitian Sasa! Community Assessment Tool, and included additional questions specific to the MADRE/KOFAVIV project. 20 The Survey Instrument is included as Annex 4(a). Key findings are summarized here, a complete description of the methodology is included in Annex 1, and more detailed findings are included as Annex 4(b). As noted there, this survey was not administered to a scientifically randomized sample; therefore the results cannot be generalized to the broader community, and they can be taken as only suggestive of the real results within the relevant population as a whole. -15- Despite these limits, the evaluation team worked to minimize bias in conducting the survey using a systematic design, counting every n th tent or household. The survey contained three modules, briefly summarized as follows: Knowledge about SGBV  Verbal abuse as a form of violence  Economic control as a form of violence  SGBV as harm to whole family  Emotional control and psychological abuse  Emotional control and physical abuse  Partner rape  SGBV as an abuse of human rights Attitudes toward SGBV  Right of married women to refuse sex  Women’s responsibility to hold family together despite abuse  Blame of women for sexual violence  Right of husband to abuse wife in case of disagreement Skills  Ability to confront an abusive friend  Ability to help an abused acquaintance  Knowledge of available services and support for SGBV survivors The main headline is that those responding to the survey showed very high levels of awareness about SGBV across the board. Although these results may have been impacted — at least in part — by the cursory and rapid nature of the survey, it is striking that results were high across the categories of knowledge, attitudes, and skills, with a few specific exceptions. With one exception, between 82 percent and 99 percent of respondents provided the answer most aligned with KOFAVIV’s key messages to the questions testing knowledge of SGBV. On attitude questions, apart from one outlier, between 89 percent and 96 percent of respondents provided the rights-respecting answer. In relation to skills, respondents demonstrated appropriate skills 92 percent and 96 percent of the time. The most striking exception to this generally positive data was the result in relation to this question: do you agree or disagree with the following stat ement: “A man imposing complete control over the family finances is a kind of violence”? Only sixty -five percent of all respondents agreed with this, and a full 34 percent disagreed. Perhaps surprisingly, there was no appreciable difference in the results between men and women, as demonstrated below (Figures 2 & 3). 21 -16- FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 When results are disaggregated by residency (inside v. outside a camp), a significant difference appears 22 : 24 percent of respondents living inside the camps felt that financial control was not a form of violence, while a full 76 percent felt that it was. Among respondents outside of camps, the results were more evenly split, with 43 percent of respondents reporting that financial control was not a form of violence, while 57 percent felt that it was (Figure 4). While it is impossible to know whether this result is due to greater exposure to GBV messages, outreach activities, and training inside camps, this is a possible explanation. -17- FIGURE 4 The power of this explanation is diminished by the fact that a similar pattern does not arise in relation to any other questions. Instead, there is one other question for which the responses were less uniformly positive. As represented in Figure 5 below, 72 percent of all respondents agreed that a woman can refuse to have sex with her husband, while a relatively large proportion — 28 percent — disagreed. FIGURE 5 There was no significant difference between camp residents and non-camp residents (Figure 6). While there was some difference in responses to this question between men and women (Figures 7 and 8), the difference was opposite to what would have been expected: more women felt that married women cannot refuse sex than men. It must be underscored that this result could stem from a sense among women that they fear abuse if they refuse sex, or that it is not acceptable for them to refuse sex within marriage. -18- FIGURE 6 FIGURE 7 FIGURE 8 -19- Without baseline data or a robust quantitative model, there is no way to know whether the diff erences observed here are related to KOFAVIV’s outreach, awareness -raising, and public campaigning against SGBV in all of its forms. The survey did suggest clearly that camp residents and community members — especially women —are aware of KOFAVIV’s programmin g and service provision. KOFAVIV performed very well as one of the top answers to the question “Can you tell me where a woman or girl who has been raped can find assistance/accompaniment?” The frequency of various answers to this question varied across male and female respondents, with more women than men specifically indicating that KOFAVIV is a place to find assistance (Figure 10), and more residents of camps aware of KOFAVIV’s services than those living outside the camps (Figure 9). FIGURE 9 FIGURE 10 -20- Further, the qualitative data collected suggest that KOFAVIV’s efforts did have an appreciable impact on communities’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills concerning SGBV. Sixteen of the twenty-five beneficiaries interviewed reported increased awareness of and knowledge about different types of SGBV, including rape, domestic violence, sexual exploitation and sexual exchange, child abuse, and abuse against child domestic workers ( restavek ) (A1, A2, A4, A6, B1, B2, B4, B5, C1, D1, D2, D3, D4, D6, E3, E4). Many beneficiaries explained that they had learned about the 72-hour rule, the wisdom of seeking a medical certificate, and the availability of psychosocial counseling and accompaniment from KOFAVIV (A1, A6, B1, E3, E4). In addition, numerous beneficiaries stressed the importance of lodging formal complaints with the police and prosecutorial personnel, finding a lawyer, and obtaining support for seeking redress (A3, A6, B1, E4). One woman said she left a man who was beating her as a result of KOFAVIV training (B3). Others commented on the crucial role the KOFAVIV program had played for young women and girls involved in sexual exchange (A2, A6, E5); several commented positively on KOFAVIV trainings that empowered such young women to create artisanal goods (A2, A6); another explained that KOFAVIV encouraged her not to have sex in exchange for goods (D5). KOFAVIV outreach workers made observations similar to those of program beneficiaries. For example, several workers emphasized that they conducted trainings on how to prevent and respond to SGBV, including training on how to use whistles in the camps and awareness of the 72-hour rule (1, 2, 5). Several outreach workers spoke about their work to reduce the stigmatization that survivors often experience (1, 2). Finally, one of the most striking findings of this evaluation was that many beneficiaries and community outreach workers identified numerous unexpected positive functions of the training and outreach work led by KOFAVIV and MADRE. First, eleven beneficiaries stressed that they learned how to be better parents, spouses, and community members, with new skills in communication, boundary-drawing, and comportment (A1, A4, A8, B2, B3, B5, C1, D1, D4, D6, E5). One beneficiary reported that she stopped hitting her children after training sessions (on-the- ground interview, CDSM/Martissant). Others said they we re better able to “dialogue” or communicate within their families and in their communities as a result of KOFAVIV training (A8, B2, B5, D4, D6, E5). One woman ex plained that “families are stronger now because of KOFAVIV” (D4), while another said that KOF A VIV “helped me control my emotions” (B2). Others spoke of the pride and sense of belonging they have gained by being part of the KOFAVIV “family” (A1, B1, D5, E5). Still others pointed to KOFAVIV activities as an antidote to the everyday stresses of living in an IDP camp (A2, A3, A5, B5, C1, E4). These elements of the project were embedded in the MADRE-KOFAVIV approach: by empowering grassroots women — often survivors of SGBV themselves — through training and mobilization, the women begin to feel more valued and respected, and they report treating others with greater respect as well. Good Practice: With deep roots in the communities displaced after the earthquake, KOFAVIV outreach workers are both community members and outreach workers. Empowering women living in the IDP camps instead of training outsiders — for example, middle - class or elite Haitians, or foreign humanitarian workers — to work as victim advocates and community educators ensures that the solutions developed are rooted in reality, Haitian - led, and respectful of the dignity of those most directly impacted by the disaster. -21- These positive spillover effects should not be underestimated. They would not be present in many traditional large-scale post-disaster projects, since that type of programming is often led by foreigners, focused on providing goods and services as opposed to knowledge and skills, and only rarely grows out of a community-based response. The fact that many outreach workers live in the camps where they provide training and awareness-raising is in itself transformative, as it creates leaders in the community and ensures that such campaigns are contextual and deeply informed. B. I NSTITUTIONAL S TRENGTHENING TO E NHANCE GBV R ESOURCES AND O UTREACH This component centers on the provision of technical assistance to strengthen institutional capacity to provide services. Utilizing participatory learning methodology, this component financed the provision of training to outreach workers to strengthen and expand their capabilities for outreach to women, men and youth of both genders in preventing GBV, developing community members’ life skills related to violence prevention, as well as reaching out to and providing support for survivors of GBV. Second, the component provided capacity building to facilitate strategic planning, strengthen the organizational infrastructure and capacity development and management to strengthen the long -term sustainability of the organization. 1. MADRE AND KOFAVIV S UCCESSFULLY T RAINED KOFAVIV O UTREACH W ORKERS A major component of the MADRE/KOFAVIV project was the delivery of four two-day trainings by MADRE to KOFAVIV’s community outreach workers. These training sessions were aim ed at concretely improving outreach workers’ skills and capacity for outreach and community awareness raising, their ability to effectively accompany support SGBV survivors, and their capacity to participate in civic conversations and debates concerning SGBV. The trainings focused on the following topics, and included the specified number of participants:  Utilizing Humanitarian Mechanisms to Address Gender-Based Violence in Haiti: International Mechanisms, November 17-18, 2011: 86 outreach workers (55 women, 31 men)  Utilizing Humanitarian Mechanisms to Address Gender-Based Violence in Haiti: Domestic Mechanisms and Civic Participation, February 9-10, 2012: 98 outreach workers (64 women, 34 men)  Addressing Stigma Associated with Sexual Violence, June 21-22, 2012: 101 outreach workers (71 women, 30 men)  Engaging in Civic Participation: Foundations for Civic Impact, August 23, 2012: 58 outreach workers (FR: 13-17). A fifth training, to focus on civic participation and media messaging (FR: 17), was scheduled for the last week of October 2012, but it was cancelled due to Hurricane Sandy. For -22- this reason, the evaluation mission associated with that training session was also canceled. This section therefore does not present any findings from direct meetings with training participants. Further, the evaluations from training participants do not provide any quantitative or summary indicators, but instead collect open-ended commentary on the specific training under review. For that reason, a systemic review of these feedback forms is beyond the scope of this evaluation. Instead, several observations can be drawn from the handwritten feedback and MADRE’s one - page summaries. A few additional comments are included here as emblematic of the types of feedback contained in the participants’ evaluation forms:  Conduct and approach of trainings: Many participants commented on how well organized the sessions were, and several appreciated especially the participatory approach to learning, especially the role-playing exercises. Commentators also noted that they appreciated the atmosphere of respect. Participants also praised the manuals distributed at the training sessions. A number of participants said that the workshops would have been better had the sessions begun on time.  Further dissemination of learning: Participants confirmed that they would share what they learned with others. Some participants explicitly called on KOFAVIV and MADRE to extend their training program to the provinces, to additional participants from other organizations, and to educational institutions such as law schools.  Human rights education: Participants emphasized the significance of understanding their rights and the rights of others. A few participants suggested that more time should have been spent concretely explaining what people could actually do with their rights, though the majority of comments related to human rights commented on the empowering effect of teaching people about their rights and the tools and opportunities made available to those working on SGBV issues in the human rights arena.  Direct contribution to improving work in camps: Many participants explained that the workshop would help them with their work in the IDP camps. Some participants identified very specific things they took away from the training: for example, one said that she had a new understanding of how to obtain a post-rape medical certificate. Others affirmed more generally that they felt more equipped to help women who experience SGBV, and others said they felt more prepared to include men in their outreach and awareness raising work. Numerous participants applauded the session on stigma, affirming that they would implement lessons from that session immediately.  Legal and Civic education: Some participants identified discussion of the draft violence against women bill as especially meaningful, including work to strategize about how to advance the law. Several participants identified specific legal elements that will help them in their work, such as knowing the role of the judge and how victims relate to rape case